识别下肢淋巴水肿患者的功能性淋巴结:高频超声的作用。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2238-7985
Feras Alshomer, Hyung Hwa Jeong, Changsik John Pak, Hyunsuk Peter Suh, Joon Pio Hong
{"title":"识别下肢淋巴水肿患者的功能性淋巴结:高频超声的作用。","authors":"Feras Alshomer, Hyung Hwa Jeong, Changsik John Pak, Hyunsuk Peter Suh, Joon Pio Hong","doi":"10.1055/a-2238-7985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Lymph nodes may play a potential role in lymphedema surgery. Radiologic evaluation of nodes may reveal the status of pathologic conditions but with limited accuracy. This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound in detecting functioning nodes in lymphedema patients and presents a criterion for determining the functionality of the lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective study reviews 30 lower extremity lymphedema cases which were candidates for lymph node to vein anastomosis. Lymphoscintigraphy and magnetic resonant lymphangiography (MRL) imaging were compared with ultrasound features which were correlated to intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) nodal uptake as an indication of functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Majority were International Society of Lymphology stage 2 late (50.0%) and stage 3 (26.7%). ICG positive uptake (functioning nodes) was noted in 22 (73.3%), while 8 patients (26.6%) had negative uptake (nonfunctioning). Ultrasound had significantly the highest specificity (100%) for identifying functional nodes followed by lymphoscintigraphy (55%) and MRL (36%; <i>p</i> = <i>0.002</i>, <i>p < 0.001</i>, respectively). This was associated with 100% positive predictive value compared against lymphoscintigraphy (44%) and MRL (36%; <i>p < 0.001 for both</i>). The identified ultrasound imaging criteria for functioning lymph node were oval lymph node shape (Solbiati Index), morphology, vascularity pattern, and vascularity quantification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The use of ultrasound in nodal evaluation was proven effective in different pathologic conditions and demonstrated the best prediction for functionality of the lymph node based on the new evaluation criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"527-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Functional Lymph Nodes in Lower Extremity Lymphedema Patients: The Role of High-frequency Ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Feras Alshomer, Hyung Hwa Jeong, Changsik John Pak, Hyunsuk Peter Suh, Joon Pio Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2238-7985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Lymph nodes may play a potential role in lymphedema surgery. Radiologic evaluation of nodes may reveal the status of pathologic conditions but with limited accuracy. This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound in detecting functioning nodes in lymphedema patients and presents a criterion for determining the functionality of the lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective study reviews 30 lower extremity lymphedema cases which were candidates for lymph node to vein anastomosis. Lymphoscintigraphy and magnetic resonant lymphangiography (MRL) imaging were compared with ultrasound features which were correlated to intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) nodal uptake as an indication of functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Majority were International Society of Lymphology stage 2 late (50.0%) and stage 3 (26.7%). ICG positive uptake (functioning nodes) was noted in 22 (73.3%), while 8 patients (26.6%) had negative uptake (nonfunctioning). Ultrasound had significantly the highest specificity (100%) for identifying functional nodes followed by lymphoscintigraphy (55%) and MRL (36%; <i>p</i> = <i>0.002</i>, <i>p < 0.001</i>, respectively). This was associated with 100% positive predictive value compared against lymphoscintigraphy (44%) and MRL (36%; <i>p < 0.001 for both</i>). The identified ultrasound imaging criteria for functioning lymph node were oval lymph node shape (Solbiati Index), morphology, vascularity pattern, and vascularity quantification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The use of ultrasound in nodal evaluation was proven effective in different pathologic conditions and demonstrated the best prediction for functionality of the lymph node based on the new evaluation criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"527-534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2238-7985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2238-7985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:淋巴结可在淋巴水肿手术中发挥潜在作用。对淋巴结的放射学评估可揭示病理状况,但准确性有限。本研究首次评估了超声波检测淋巴水肿患者功能性淋巴结的效果,并提出了淋巴结功能性的判断标准。材料与方法 本回顾性研究回顾了 30 例下肢淋巴水肿病例,这些病例都是淋巴结与静脉吻合术(LNVA)的候选者。将淋巴管造影和磁共振淋巴管造影成像与超声波特征进行比较,并将超声波特征与术中吲哚青绿(ICG)结节摄取量相关联,作为功能性的指标。结果 大多数患者为 ISL 2 期晚期(50.0%)和 3 期(26.7%)。22 名患者(73.3%)的 ICG 摄取呈阳性(功能正常的结节),8 名患者(26.6%)的 ICG 摄取呈阴性(功能不正常)。超声在识别功能性结节方面的特异性最高(100%),其次是淋巴管造影(55%)和 MR 淋巴管造影(36%)(P=0.002,P 结论:根据新的评估标准,在不同病理条件下使用超声评估结节被证明是有效的,并显示出对淋巴结功能的最佳预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Functional Lymph Nodes in Lower Extremity Lymphedema Patients: The Role of High-frequency Ultrasound.

Background:  Lymph nodes may play a potential role in lymphedema surgery. Radiologic evaluation of nodes may reveal the status of pathologic conditions but with limited accuracy. This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound in detecting functioning nodes in lymphedema patients and presents a criterion for determining the functionality of the lymph nodes.

Methods:  This retrospective study reviews 30 lower extremity lymphedema cases which were candidates for lymph node to vein anastomosis. Lymphoscintigraphy and magnetic resonant lymphangiography (MRL) imaging were compared with ultrasound features which were correlated to intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) nodal uptake as an indication of functionality.

Results:  Majority were International Society of Lymphology stage 2 late (50.0%) and stage 3 (26.7%). ICG positive uptake (functioning nodes) was noted in 22 (73.3%), while 8 patients (26.6%) had negative uptake (nonfunctioning). Ultrasound had significantly the highest specificity (100%) for identifying functional nodes followed by lymphoscintigraphy (55%) and MRL (36%; p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). This was associated with 100% positive predictive value compared against lymphoscintigraphy (44%) and MRL (36%; p < 0.001 for both). The identified ultrasound imaging criteria for functioning lymph node were oval lymph node shape (Solbiati Index), morphology, vascularity pattern, and vascularity quantification.

Conclusion:  The use of ultrasound in nodal evaluation was proven effective in different pathologic conditions and demonstrated the best prediction for functionality of the lymph node based on the new evaluation criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Free Fasciocutaneous versus Muscle Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Implications for Functionality and Quality of Life. Utilizing Perforator Propeller Flaps for Donor Site Closure: Harvesting Large Workhorse Flaps without Lingering Concerns. Oncoplastic Surgery with Volume Replacement versus Mastectomy with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Early Postoperative Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer. Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. The Vascular Anatomy and Harvesting of the Lateral Femoral Condyle Flap in Pigs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1