Santosh V. Varigonda , Luisa P. Serafim , Maxim Freydin , Earl. H. Dowell , Venkateswaran Narayanaswamy
{"title":"执行扑翼后振荡的弹性面板的二维压力场成像","authors":"Santosh V. Varigonda , Luisa P. Serafim , Maxim Freydin , Earl. H. Dowell , Venkateswaran Narayanaswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.104056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Two dimensional pressure field was acquired at 10 kHz to study the post flutter oscillations of a thin elastic panel placed beneath a Mach 2.5 turbulent boundary layer<span><span>. The panel was made of aluminum and is secured to the mounting fixture using a collection of </span>rivets, which resulted in a boundary condition that was between both ideally clamped and pinned boundaries. Direct comparison of the mean and unsteady pressure fields were made for the panel executing post flutter oscillations and oscillations away from the flutter boundary. Whereas the mean pressure fields were largely similar during and away from post-flutter oscillations, the unsteady pressure fields showed a significant increase in the </span></span><span><math><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi><mo>.</mo><mi>m</mi><mo>.</mo><mi>s</mi><mo>.</mo></mrow></msub></math></span><span> during post flutter oscillations. The spectral content of the pressure oscillations and panel oscillations revealed that the tonal aeroelastic frequency dominate the post flutter oscillations. This tonal frequency was determined to lie at the close vicinity of the (2,1) panel elastic mode. The r.m.s. panel deflection field during post flutter oscillations were also reconstructed from the unsteady pressure fields and the reconstructed panel deflection also corresponded to the (2,1) elastic mode.Further coherence and cross-correlation analyses provided insights into possible mechanisms that control the transition of the panel oscillations away from the flutter boundary. The analyses suggest that the transition away from the flutter boundary is possibly initiated by the decoherence of the organized pressure field during the post flutter region by the turbulent boundary layer.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-dimensional pressure field imaging of an elastic panel executing post-flutter oscillations\",\"authors\":\"Santosh V. Varigonda , Luisa P. Serafim , Maxim Freydin , Earl. H. Dowell , Venkateswaran Narayanaswamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.104056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Two dimensional pressure field was acquired at 10 kHz to study the post flutter oscillations of a thin elastic panel placed beneath a Mach 2.5 turbulent boundary layer<span><span>. The panel was made of aluminum and is secured to the mounting fixture using a collection of </span>rivets, which resulted in a boundary condition that was between both ideally clamped and pinned boundaries. Direct comparison of the mean and unsteady pressure fields were made for the panel executing post flutter oscillations and oscillations away from the flutter boundary. Whereas the mean pressure fields were largely similar during and away from post-flutter oscillations, the unsteady pressure fields showed a significant increase in the </span></span><span><math><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>r</mi><mo>.</mo><mi>m</mi><mo>.</mo><mi>s</mi><mo>.</mo></mrow></msub></math></span><span> during post flutter oscillations. The spectral content of the pressure oscillations and panel oscillations revealed that the tonal aeroelastic frequency dominate the post flutter oscillations. This tonal frequency was determined to lie at the close vicinity of the (2,1) panel elastic mode. The r.m.s. panel deflection field during post flutter oscillations were also reconstructed from the unsteady pressure fields and the reconstructed panel deflection also corresponded to the (2,1) elastic mode.Further coherence and cross-correlation analyses provided insights into possible mechanisms that control the transition of the panel oscillations away from the flutter boundary. The analyses suggest that the transition away from the flutter boundary is possibly initiated by the decoherence of the organized pressure field during the post flutter region by the turbulent boundary layer.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluids and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluids and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889974623002244\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889974623002244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two-dimensional pressure field imaging of an elastic panel executing post-flutter oscillations
Two dimensional pressure field was acquired at 10 kHz to study the post flutter oscillations of a thin elastic panel placed beneath a Mach 2.5 turbulent boundary layer. The panel was made of aluminum and is secured to the mounting fixture using a collection of rivets, which resulted in a boundary condition that was between both ideally clamped and pinned boundaries. Direct comparison of the mean and unsteady pressure fields were made for the panel executing post flutter oscillations and oscillations away from the flutter boundary. Whereas the mean pressure fields were largely similar during and away from post-flutter oscillations, the unsteady pressure fields showed a significant increase in the during post flutter oscillations. The spectral content of the pressure oscillations and panel oscillations revealed that the tonal aeroelastic frequency dominate the post flutter oscillations. This tonal frequency was determined to lie at the close vicinity of the (2,1) panel elastic mode. The r.m.s. panel deflection field during post flutter oscillations were also reconstructed from the unsteady pressure fields and the reconstructed panel deflection also corresponded to the (2,1) elastic mode.Further coherence and cross-correlation analyses provided insights into possible mechanisms that control the transition of the panel oscillations away from the flutter boundary. The analyses suggest that the transition away from the flutter boundary is possibly initiated by the decoherence of the organized pressure field during the post flutter region by the turbulent boundary layer.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Fluids and Structures serves as a focal point and a forum for the exchange of ideas, for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with fluid–structure interactions and the dynamics of systems related thereto, in any field. One of its aims is to foster the cross–fertilization of ideas, methods and techniques in the various disciplines involved.
The journal publishes papers that present original and significant contributions on all aspects of the mechanical interactions between fluids and solids, regardless of scale.