基于现金的干预措施与暴力之间的关系:系统审查和证据图

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Aggression and Violent Behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2023.101909
Daiane Borges Machado , Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha , Fanny Cortes , Luís F.S. Castro-de-Araujo , Flavia Jôse Oliveira Alves , Dandara Ramos , Erika Fialho Xavier , Fernando Zanghelini , William Rudgard , David K. Humphreys , Maurício L. Barreto
{"title":"基于现金的干预措施与暴力之间的关系:系统审查和证据图","authors":"Daiane Borges Machado ,&nbsp;Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha ,&nbsp;Fanny Cortes ,&nbsp;Luís F.S. Castro-de-Araujo ,&nbsp;Flavia Jôse Oliveira Alves ,&nbsp;Dandara Ramos ,&nbsp;Erika Fialho Xavier ,&nbsp;Fernando Zanghelini ,&nbsp;William Rudgard ,&nbsp;David K. Humphreys ,&nbsp;Maurício L. Barreto","doi":"10.1016/j.avb.2023.101909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Violence of all types is a global public health problem<span>. Cash-based incentives can potentially reduce violence outcomes by reducing economic hardership. We aim to deliver a comprehensive systematic review of the relationship between cash-based incentives with a variety of violence outcomes.</span></p><p>We searched studies assessing the relationship between cash-based incentives with violence outcomes at PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health and LILACS from the database's creation until July 12th, 2023. We evaluated the relationship of cash-based incentives on five types of violence outcome: intimate partner violence (IPV), child maltreatment, suicide, youth violence, and general violence. Cash-based incentives were grouped into Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT), Unconditional Cash Transfer (CCT), cash in combination with interventions other than cash(cash+), tax credits, cash for work and start-up grants. We classified the strength of evidence according to the study design and quality. An evidence map was developed to indicate gaps in the literature and impact (reduction, null and mixed). This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42020167049. The strength of evidence was mainly classified as moderate, or limited. The evidence map indicated research gaps on the effect of cash+ and cash for work on suicide and general violence, tax credit on general violence and start-up grants on child maltreatment, suicide, and general violence.</p><p>Despite the important number of mixed evidence, we found strong and very strong evidence that cash-based interventions reduced transactional and age-disparate sex among girls, suicide, IPV victimisation, physical, emotional and sexual IPV, and physical child maltreatment. Future studies should focus on the gaps found in this review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51360,"journal":{"name":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between cash-based interventions and violence: A systematic review and evidence map\",\"authors\":\"Daiane Borges Machado ,&nbsp;Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha ,&nbsp;Fanny Cortes ,&nbsp;Luís F.S. Castro-de-Araujo ,&nbsp;Flavia Jôse Oliveira Alves ,&nbsp;Dandara Ramos ,&nbsp;Erika Fialho Xavier ,&nbsp;Fernando Zanghelini ,&nbsp;William Rudgard ,&nbsp;David K. Humphreys ,&nbsp;Maurício L. Barreto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avb.2023.101909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Violence of all types is a global public health problem<span>. Cash-based incentives can potentially reduce violence outcomes by reducing economic hardership. We aim to deliver a comprehensive systematic review of the relationship between cash-based incentives with a variety of violence outcomes.</span></p><p>We searched studies assessing the relationship between cash-based incentives with violence outcomes at PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health and LILACS from the database's creation until July 12th, 2023. We evaluated the relationship of cash-based incentives on five types of violence outcome: intimate partner violence (IPV), child maltreatment, suicide, youth violence, and general violence. Cash-based incentives were grouped into Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT), Unconditional Cash Transfer (CCT), cash in combination with interventions other than cash(cash+), tax credits, cash for work and start-up grants. We classified the strength of evidence according to the study design and quality. An evidence map was developed to indicate gaps in the literature and impact (reduction, null and mixed). This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42020167049. The strength of evidence was mainly classified as moderate, or limited. The evidence map indicated research gaps on the effect of cash+ and cash for work on suicide and general violence, tax credit on general violence and start-up grants on child maltreatment, suicide, and general violence.</p><p>Despite the important number of mixed evidence, we found strong and very strong evidence that cash-based interventions reduced transactional and age-disparate sex among girls, suicide, IPV victimisation, physical, emotional and sexual IPV, and physical child maltreatment. Future studies should focus on the gaps found in this review.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aggression and Violent Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aggression and Violent Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178923000964\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178923000964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种类型的暴力是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。以现金为基础的激励措施有可能通过减少经济困难来减少暴力事件的发生。我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、Global Health 和 LILACS 等数据库中搜索了从数据库创建到 2023 年 7 月 12 日期间评估现金激励与暴力结果之间关系的研究。我们评估了现金激励措施与五类暴力结果的关系:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)、虐待儿童、自杀、青少年暴力和一般暴力。基于现金的激励措施分为有条件现金转移(CCT)、无条件现金转移(CCT)、现金与现金以外的干预措施相结合(现金+)、税收减免、以工代赈和创业补助。我们根据研究设计和质量对证据的强度进行了分类。我们还绘制了一张证据图,以标明文献中的空白和影响(减少、无效和混合)。本系统综述已在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42020167049。证据强度主要分为中等或有限。证据图显示,在现金+和以工代赈对自杀和一般暴力的影响、税收抵免对一般暴力的影响以及启动补助金对虐待儿童、自杀和一般暴力的影响方面存在研究空白。尽管存在大量混合证据,但我们发现了有力和非常有力的证据,表明基于现金的干预措施减少了女孩之间的性交易和年龄差异、自杀、IPV 伤害、身体、情感和性 IPV 以及对儿童的身体虐待。未来的研究应重点关注本综述中发现的不足之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between cash-based interventions and violence: A systematic review and evidence map

Violence of all types is a global public health problem. Cash-based incentives can potentially reduce violence outcomes by reducing economic hardership. We aim to deliver a comprehensive systematic review of the relationship between cash-based incentives with a variety of violence outcomes.

We searched studies assessing the relationship between cash-based incentives with violence outcomes at PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health and LILACS from the database's creation until July 12th, 2023. We evaluated the relationship of cash-based incentives on five types of violence outcome: intimate partner violence (IPV), child maltreatment, suicide, youth violence, and general violence. Cash-based incentives were grouped into Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT), Unconditional Cash Transfer (CCT), cash in combination with interventions other than cash(cash+), tax credits, cash for work and start-up grants. We classified the strength of evidence according to the study design and quality. An evidence map was developed to indicate gaps in the literature and impact (reduction, null and mixed). This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42020167049. The strength of evidence was mainly classified as moderate, or limited. The evidence map indicated research gaps on the effect of cash+ and cash for work on suicide and general violence, tax credit on general violence and start-up grants on child maltreatment, suicide, and general violence.

Despite the important number of mixed evidence, we found strong and very strong evidence that cash-based interventions reduced transactional and age-disparate sex among girls, suicide, IPV victimisation, physical, emotional and sexual IPV, and physical child maltreatment. Future studies should focus on the gaps found in this review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Aggression and Violent Behavior, A Review Journal is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes substantive and integrative reviews, as well as summary reports of innovative ongoing clinical research programs on a wide range of topics germane to the field of aggression and violent behavior. Papers encompass a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including homicide (serial, spree, and mass murder: sexual homicide), sexual deviance and assault (rape, serial rape, child molestation, paraphilias), child and youth violence (firesetting, gang violence, juvenile sexual offending), family violence (child physical and sexual abuse, child neglect, incest, spouse and elder abuse), genetic predispositions, and the physiological basis of aggression.
期刊最新文献
The effects of hot spots policing on violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis The management of aggression in third wave behavioral therapies: A systematic review Experiences of forensic mental health patients and professionals with shared violence risk assessment and management: A scoping review of qualitative studies School bullying perpetration and victimization as predictors of youth delinquency: A meta-analysis of prospective studies and data Neuro-cognitive systems that, when dysfunctional, increase aggression risk and the potential for translation into clinical tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1