长期门诊 SUD 治疗期间功能和精神压力的逐步改善--一项前瞻性事后研究

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100525
Karin Berle Gabrielsen , Thomas Clausen , Siri Håvås Haugland , John-Kåre Vederhus
{"title":"长期门诊 SUD 治疗期间功能和精神压力的逐步改善--一项前瞻性事后研究","authors":"Karin Berle Gabrielsen ,&nbsp;Thomas Clausen ,&nbsp;Siri Håvås Haugland ,&nbsp;John-Kåre Vederhus","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Globally, outpatient programs for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have gained prominence. To assess the broader clinical implications of this trend we investigated shifts in functioning experienced by outpatients undergoing treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We describe the clinical characteristics of a cohort of 93 SUD patients in a Norwegian outpatient treatment clinic. Using paired-samples t-tests, we examined changes in perceived functioning, mental distress, and other clinically relevant outcome variables in a 5-month time interval during the treatment course.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained follow-up data for 67 (72%) of the included patients, with no significant difference in patient-related factors between those who completed the treatment course and those who were not assessed at follow-up. Perceived functioning increased significantly from study inclusion (Time 0) (mean 19.8, standard deviation ± 8.8) to its conclusion (Time 1) (24.3, ±9.3; <em>t</em> (66) = 4.5, (95% CI: 2.5–6.5, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). We also identified significant improvement in most other measured variables, including mental distress, self-reported sleep quality, restlessness, and obsessive thinking. Substance use–related variables showed a modest, non-significant improvement at T1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During a 5-month course of outpatient treatment, patients’ subjective experience of functioning improved significantly. Those with the lowest functioning levels at T0 improved the most. Structured monitoring may be a valuable clinical tool for personalizing intervention, enhancing treatment outcomes, and supporting the clinical decision-making process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000026/pdfft?md5=4a2fdec1cfbca190d00b8a86946d361b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853224000026-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gradual improvement in functioning and mental distress during long-term outpatient SUD treatment – A prospective pre-post study\",\"authors\":\"Karin Berle Gabrielsen ,&nbsp;Thomas Clausen ,&nbsp;Siri Håvås Haugland ,&nbsp;John-Kåre Vederhus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Globally, outpatient programs for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have gained prominence. To assess the broader clinical implications of this trend we investigated shifts in functioning experienced by outpatients undergoing treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We describe the clinical characteristics of a cohort of 93 SUD patients in a Norwegian outpatient treatment clinic. Using paired-samples t-tests, we examined changes in perceived functioning, mental distress, and other clinically relevant outcome variables in a 5-month time interval during the treatment course.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained follow-up data for 67 (72%) of the included patients, with no significant difference in patient-related factors between those who completed the treatment course and those who were not assessed at follow-up. Perceived functioning increased significantly from study inclusion (Time 0) (mean 19.8, standard deviation ± 8.8) to its conclusion (Time 1) (24.3, ±9.3; <em>t</em> (66) = 4.5, (95% CI: 2.5–6.5, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). We also identified significant improvement in most other measured variables, including mental distress, self-reported sleep quality, restlessness, and obsessive thinking. Substance use–related variables showed a modest, non-significant improvement at T1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During a 5-month course of outpatient treatment, patients’ subjective experience of functioning improved significantly. Those with the lowest functioning levels at T0 improved the most. Structured monitoring may be a valuable clinical tool for personalizing intervention, enhancing treatment outcomes, and supporting the clinical decision-making process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000026/pdfft?md5=4a2fdec1cfbca190d00b8a86946d361b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853224000026-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853224000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在全球范围内,药物使用障碍(SUD)的门诊治疗项目越来越受到重视。为了评估这一趋势对临床的广泛影响,我们对正在接受治疗的门诊患者的功能变化情况进行了调查。结果我们获得了67名(72%)患者的随访数据,完成疗程的患者与未接受随访评估的患者在患者相关因素方面没有显著差异。从纳入研究(时间 0)(平均值 19.8,标准差 ± 8.8)到研究结束(时间 1)(24.3,±9.3;t (66) = 4.5,(95% CI:2.5-6.5,p < 0.001),患者的感知功能明显提高。我们还发现,大多数其他测量变量也有明显改善,包括精神压力、自我报告的睡眠质量、烦躁不安和强迫性思维。在为期 5 个月的门诊治疗中,患者的主观功能体验有了明显改善。在为期 5 个月的门诊治疗过程中,患者的主观功能体验得到了明显改善。结构化监测可能是个性化干预、提高治疗效果和支持临床决策过程的重要临床工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gradual improvement in functioning and mental distress during long-term outpatient SUD treatment – A prospective pre-post study

Background

Globally, outpatient programs for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have gained prominence. To assess the broader clinical implications of this trend we investigated shifts in functioning experienced by outpatients undergoing treatment.

Methods

We describe the clinical characteristics of a cohort of 93 SUD patients in a Norwegian outpatient treatment clinic. Using paired-samples t-tests, we examined changes in perceived functioning, mental distress, and other clinically relevant outcome variables in a 5-month time interval during the treatment course.

Results

We obtained follow-up data for 67 (72%) of the included patients, with no significant difference in patient-related factors between those who completed the treatment course and those who were not assessed at follow-up. Perceived functioning increased significantly from study inclusion (Time 0) (mean 19.8, standard deviation ± 8.8) to its conclusion (Time 1) (24.3, ±9.3; t (66) = 4.5, (95% CI: 2.5–6.5, p < 0.001). We also identified significant improvement in most other measured variables, including mental distress, self-reported sleep quality, restlessness, and obsessive thinking. Substance use–related variables showed a modest, non-significant improvement at T1.

Conclusion

During a 5-month course of outpatient treatment, patients’ subjective experience of functioning improved significantly. Those with the lowest functioning levels at T0 improved the most. Structured monitoring may be a valuable clinical tool for personalizing intervention, enhancing treatment outcomes, and supporting the clinical decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
期刊最新文献
Reliability generalization Meta-Analysis and psychometric review of the Gaming Disorder test (GDT): Evaluating internal consistency Proteus effect avatar profiles: Associations with disordered gaming and activity levels Acceptability of heart rate-based remote monitoring of smoking status Video slot machine use in adolescence: the role of self-efficacy beliefs, current and expected personal fulfillment at the social and educational level Cognitive inflexibility moderates the relationship between relief-driven drinking motives and alcohol use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1