{"title":"3096 人的腰骶部过渡椎骨:南非人口的发病率和形态及其与人口亲缘关系的关系","authors":"G.J. Paton , S.A. Williams , S. Nalla , G.J. Louw","doi":"10.1016/j.tria.2024.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study sought to establish the prevalence and morphological characteristics of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in the South African population and its correlation with South African's population affinities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed of 3096 consecutive thoracic-abdominal-pelvic radiographs at two large public hospitals in South Africa. Categorisation of LSTV was classified according to Castellvi et al. (1984): Types II, III, and IV with unilateral (A) or bilateral (B) subtypes present. The three largest South African population groups (participant self-identified), namely Black African, Coloured and White population affinities were equally sampled, comprising 1032 radiographs for each population affinity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall prevalence of LSTV was 10 % (N = 308 of 3096). Prevalence by classification/type was 67.9 %, 27.6 % and 4.5 % for II, III, and IV, respectively. The most prevalent subtype was Type IIA (41.9 %), Type IIB (26 %), Type IIIB (21.8 %), and Type IV (5.8 %), respectively. Prevalence by frequency of side was bilateral (47.7 %), left (26.6 %), right (21.1 %), while 4.5 % could not be sided (Type IV morphology). The sex distribution was 53.9 % (166/308) female and 46.1 % (142/308) male. Prevalence by population affinity was 10.5 %, 9.3 % and 9.9 % for the Black African, Coloured and White population affinities, respectively. Analyses of all groups found that the Black African and Coloured populations demonstrated two statistically significant results: greater affinity for the prevalence of sacralisation (95 % CI: 0.396–4.33, <em>p</em> = 0.008), and sacralisation amongst males (95 %, CI: 0.42–3.36, <em>p</em> = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study was the first dedicated study of LSTV prevalence in a South African population. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LSTV between the three largest population groups. Statistically, sacralisation was observed in greater proportions in the Black African and Coloured populations, particularly among males.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37913,"journal":{"name":"Translational Research in Anatomy","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013/pdfft?md5=ce01e2fdb7911a9079fdd1657346f5a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2214854X24000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae of 3096 individuals: Prevalence and morphology in a South African population and its association with population affinity\",\"authors\":\"G.J. Paton , S.A. Williams , S. Nalla , G.J. Louw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tria.2024.100281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study sought to establish the prevalence and morphological characteristics of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in the South African population and its correlation with South African's population affinities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed of 3096 consecutive thoracic-abdominal-pelvic radiographs at two large public hospitals in South Africa. Categorisation of LSTV was classified according to Castellvi et al. (1984): Types II, III, and IV with unilateral (A) or bilateral (B) subtypes present. The three largest South African population groups (participant self-identified), namely Black African, Coloured and White population affinities were equally sampled, comprising 1032 radiographs for each population affinity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall prevalence of LSTV was 10 % (N = 308 of 3096). Prevalence by classification/type was 67.9 %, 27.6 % and 4.5 % for II, III, and IV, respectively. The most prevalent subtype was Type IIA (41.9 %), Type IIB (26 %), Type IIIB (21.8 %), and Type IV (5.8 %), respectively. Prevalence by frequency of side was bilateral (47.7 %), left (26.6 %), right (21.1 %), while 4.5 % could not be sided (Type IV morphology). The sex distribution was 53.9 % (166/308) female and 46.1 % (142/308) male. Prevalence by population affinity was 10.5 %, 9.3 % and 9.9 % for the Black African, Coloured and White population affinities, respectively. Analyses of all groups found that the Black African and Coloured populations demonstrated two statistically significant results: greater affinity for the prevalence of sacralisation (95 % CI: 0.396–4.33, <em>p</em> = 0.008), and sacralisation amongst males (95 %, CI: 0.42–3.36, <em>p</em> = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study was the first dedicated study of LSTV prevalence in a South African population. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LSTV between the three largest population groups. Statistically, sacralisation was observed in greater proportions in the Black African and Coloured populations, particularly among males.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Research in Anatomy\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013/pdfft?md5=ce01e2fdb7911a9079fdd1657346f5a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2214854X24000013-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Research in Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Research in Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae of 3096 individuals: Prevalence and morphology in a South African population and its association with population affinity
Purpose
This study sought to establish the prevalence and morphological characteristics of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in the South African population and its correlation with South African's population affinities.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of 3096 consecutive thoracic-abdominal-pelvic radiographs at two large public hospitals in South Africa. Categorisation of LSTV was classified according to Castellvi et al. (1984): Types II, III, and IV with unilateral (A) or bilateral (B) subtypes present. The three largest South African population groups (participant self-identified), namely Black African, Coloured and White population affinities were equally sampled, comprising 1032 radiographs for each population affinity.
Results
The overall prevalence of LSTV was 10 % (N = 308 of 3096). Prevalence by classification/type was 67.9 %, 27.6 % and 4.5 % for II, III, and IV, respectively. The most prevalent subtype was Type IIA (41.9 %), Type IIB (26 %), Type IIIB (21.8 %), and Type IV (5.8 %), respectively. Prevalence by frequency of side was bilateral (47.7 %), left (26.6 %), right (21.1 %), while 4.5 % could not be sided (Type IV morphology). The sex distribution was 53.9 % (166/308) female and 46.1 % (142/308) male. Prevalence by population affinity was 10.5 %, 9.3 % and 9.9 % for the Black African, Coloured and White population affinities, respectively. Analyses of all groups found that the Black African and Coloured populations demonstrated two statistically significant results: greater affinity for the prevalence of sacralisation (95 % CI: 0.396–4.33, p = 0.008), and sacralisation amongst males (95 %, CI: 0.42–3.36, p = 0.010).
Conclusion
This study was the first dedicated study of LSTV prevalence in a South African population. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LSTV between the three largest population groups. Statistically, sacralisation was observed in greater proportions in the Black African and Coloured populations, particularly among males.
期刊介绍:
Translational Research in Anatomy is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes high-quality original papers. Focusing on translational research, the journal aims to disseminate the knowledge that is gained in the basic science of anatomy and to apply it to the diagnosis and treatment of human pathology in order to improve individual patient well-being. Topics published in Translational Research in Anatomy include anatomy in all of its aspects, especially those that have application to other scientific disciplines including the health sciences: • gross anatomy • neuroanatomy • histology • immunohistochemistry • comparative anatomy • embryology • molecular biology • microscopic anatomy • forensics • imaging/radiology • medical education Priority will be given to studies that clearly articulate their relevance to the broader aspects of anatomy and how they can impact patient care.Strengthening the ties between morphological research and medicine will foster collaboration between anatomists and physicians. Therefore, Translational Research in Anatomy will serve as a platform for communication and understanding between the disciplines of anatomy and medicine and will aid in the dissemination of anatomical research. The journal accepts the following article types: 1. Review articles 2. Original research papers 3. New state-of-the-art methods of research in the field of anatomy including imaging, dissection methods, medical devices and quantitation 4. Education papers (teaching technologies/methods in medical education in anatomy) 5. Commentaries 6. Letters to the Editor 7. Selected conference papers 8. Case Reports