3096 人的腰骶部过渡椎骨:南非人口的发病率和形态及其与人口亲缘关系的关系

G.J. Paton , S.A. Williams , S. Nalla , G.J. Louw
{"title":"3096 人的腰骶部过渡椎骨:南非人口的发病率和形态及其与人口亲缘关系的关系","authors":"G.J. Paton ,&nbsp;S.A. Williams ,&nbsp;S. Nalla ,&nbsp;G.J. Louw","doi":"10.1016/j.tria.2024.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study sought to establish the prevalence and morphological characteristics of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in the South African population and its correlation with South African's population affinities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed of 3096 consecutive thoracic-abdominal-pelvic radiographs at two large public hospitals in South Africa. Categorisation of LSTV was classified according to Castellvi et al. (1984): Types II, III, and IV with unilateral (A) or bilateral (B) subtypes present. The three largest South African population groups (participant self-identified), namely Black African, Coloured and White population affinities were equally sampled, comprising 1032 radiographs for each population affinity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall prevalence of LSTV was 10 % (N = 308 of 3096). Prevalence by classification/type was 67.9 %, 27.6 % and 4.5 % for II, III, and IV, respectively. The most prevalent subtype was Type IIA (41.9 %), Type IIB (26 %), Type IIIB (21.8 %), and Type IV (5.8 %), respectively. Prevalence by frequency of side was bilateral (47.7 %), left (26.6 %), right (21.1 %), while 4.5 % could not be sided (Type IV morphology). The sex distribution was 53.9 % (166/308) female and 46.1 % (142/308) male. Prevalence by population affinity was 10.5 %, 9.3 % and 9.9 % for the Black African, Coloured and White population affinities, respectively. Analyses of all groups found that the Black African and Coloured populations demonstrated two statistically significant results: greater affinity for the prevalence of sacralisation (95 % CI: 0.396–4.33, <em>p</em> = 0.008), and sacralisation amongst males (95 %, CI: 0.42–3.36, <em>p</em> = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study was the first dedicated study of LSTV prevalence in a South African population. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LSTV between the three largest population groups. Statistically, sacralisation was observed in greater proportions in the Black African and Coloured populations, particularly among males.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37913,"journal":{"name":"Translational Research in Anatomy","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013/pdfft?md5=ce01e2fdb7911a9079fdd1657346f5a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2214854X24000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae of 3096 individuals: Prevalence and morphology in a South African population and its association with population affinity\",\"authors\":\"G.J. Paton ,&nbsp;S.A. Williams ,&nbsp;S. Nalla ,&nbsp;G.J. Louw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tria.2024.100281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study sought to establish the prevalence and morphological characteristics of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in the South African population and its correlation with South African's population affinities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed of 3096 consecutive thoracic-abdominal-pelvic radiographs at two large public hospitals in South Africa. Categorisation of LSTV was classified according to Castellvi et al. (1984): Types II, III, and IV with unilateral (A) or bilateral (B) subtypes present. The three largest South African population groups (participant self-identified), namely Black African, Coloured and White population affinities were equally sampled, comprising 1032 radiographs for each population affinity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall prevalence of LSTV was 10 % (N = 308 of 3096). Prevalence by classification/type was 67.9 %, 27.6 % and 4.5 % for II, III, and IV, respectively. The most prevalent subtype was Type IIA (41.9 %), Type IIB (26 %), Type IIIB (21.8 %), and Type IV (5.8 %), respectively. Prevalence by frequency of side was bilateral (47.7 %), left (26.6 %), right (21.1 %), while 4.5 % could not be sided (Type IV morphology). The sex distribution was 53.9 % (166/308) female and 46.1 % (142/308) male. Prevalence by population affinity was 10.5 %, 9.3 % and 9.9 % for the Black African, Coloured and White population affinities, respectively. Analyses of all groups found that the Black African and Coloured populations demonstrated two statistically significant results: greater affinity for the prevalence of sacralisation (95 % CI: 0.396–4.33, <em>p</em> = 0.008), and sacralisation amongst males (95 %, CI: 0.42–3.36, <em>p</em> = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study was the first dedicated study of LSTV prevalence in a South African population. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LSTV between the three largest population groups. Statistically, sacralisation was observed in greater proportions in the Black African and Coloured populations, particularly among males.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Research in Anatomy\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013/pdfft?md5=ce01e2fdb7911a9079fdd1657346f5a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2214854X24000013-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Research in Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Research in Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X24000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定腰骶部过渡椎体(LSTV)在南非人口中的患病率和形态特征,以及其与南非人口亲缘关系的相关性。方法对南非两家大型公立医院的 3096 张连续胸腹盆X光片进行了回顾性审查。根据 Castellvi 等人(1984 年)对 LSTV 进行了分类:II、III 和 IV 型,存在单侧(A)或双侧(B)亚型。对南非三个最大的人口群体(参与者自我认定),即非洲黑人、有色人种和白人人口亲缘关系进行了同等取样,每个人口亲缘关系包括 1032 张射线照片。结果LSTV 的总患病率为 10%(3096 人中的 308 人)。按分类/类型划分,II、III 和 IV 型的患病率分别为 67.9%、27.6% 和 4.5%。最常见的亚型分别是 IIA 型(41.9%)、IIB 型(26%)、IIIB 型(21.8%)和 IV 型(5.8%)。两侧发病率分别为双侧(47.7%)、左侧(26.6%)、右侧(21.1%),4.5%无法分侧(IV 型形态)。性别分布为女性占 53.9%(166/308),男性占 46.1%(142/308)。黑非洲人、有色人种和白人的发病率分别为 10.5%、9.3% 和 9.9%。对所有群体进行分析后发现,黑非洲人和有色人种显示出两个具有统计学意义的结果:骶骨化流行率的亲和力更高(95 % CI:0.396-4.33,p = 0.008),以及男性中的骶骨化(95 %,CI:0.42-3.36,p = 0.010)。三个最大的人口群体之间的 LSTV 患病率没有明显差异。据统计,骶骨化在非洲黑人和有色人种中的比例更高,尤其是在男性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae of 3096 individuals: Prevalence and morphology in a South African population and its association with population affinity

Purpose

This study sought to establish the prevalence and morphological characteristics of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in the South African population and its correlation with South African's population affinities.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 3096 consecutive thoracic-abdominal-pelvic radiographs at two large public hospitals in South Africa. Categorisation of LSTV was classified according to Castellvi et al. (1984): Types II, III, and IV with unilateral (A) or bilateral (B) subtypes present. The three largest South African population groups (participant self-identified), namely Black African, Coloured and White population affinities were equally sampled, comprising 1032 radiographs for each population affinity.

Results

The overall prevalence of LSTV was 10 % (N = 308 of 3096). Prevalence by classification/type was 67.9 %, 27.6 % and 4.5 % for II, III, and IV, respectively. The most prevalent subtype was Type IIA (41.9 %), Type IIB (26 %), Type IIIB (21.8 %), and Type IV (5.8 %), respectively. Prevalence by frequency of side was bilateral (47.7 %), left (26.6 %), right (21.1 %), while 4.5 % could not be sided (Type IV morphology). The sex distribution was 53.9 % (166/308) female and 46.1 % (142/308) male. Prevalence by population affinity was 10.5 %, 9.3 % and 9.9 % for the Black African, Coloured and White population affinities, respectively. Analyses of all groups found that the Black African and Coloured populations demonstrated two statistically significant results: greater affinity for the prevalence of sacralisation (95 % CI: 0.396–4.33, p = 0.008), and sacralisation amongst males (95 %, CI: 0.42–3.36, p = 0.010).

Conclusion

This study was the first dedicated study of LSTV prevalence in a South African population. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LSTV between the three largest population groups. Statistically, sacralisation was observed in greater proportions in the Black African and Coloured populations, particularly among males.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Translational Research in Anatomy is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes high-quality original papers. Focusing on translational research, the journal aims to disseminate the knowledge that is gained in the basic science of anatomy and to apply it to the diagnosis and treatment of human pathology in order to improve individual patient well-being. Topics published in Translational Research in Anatomy include anatomy in all of its aspects, especially those that have application to other scientific disciplines including the health sciences: • gross anatomy • neuroanatomy • histology • immunohistochemistry • comparative anatomy • embryology • molecular biology • microscopic anatomy • forensics • imaging/radiology • medical education Priority will be given to studies that clearly articulate their relevance to the broader aspects of anatomy and how they can impact patient care.Strengthening the ties between morphological research and medicine will foster collaboration between anatomists and physicians. Therefore, Translational Research in Anatomy will serve as a platform for communication and understanding between the disciplines of anatomy and medicine and will aid in the dissemination of anatomical research. The journal accepts the following article types: 1. Review articles 2. Original research papers 3. New state-of-the-art methods of research in the field of anatomy including imaging, dissection methods, medical devices and quantitation 4. Education papers (teaching technologies/methods in medical education in anatomy) 5. Commentaries 6. Letters to the Editor 7. Selected conference papers 8. Case Reports
期刊最新文献
Median nerve piercing the humeral head of pronator teres muscle: An anatomical case report of atypical median nerve formation and course Sex and stature estimations from dry femurs of Northeastern Thais: Using a logistic and linear regression approach Variations of the ulnar nerve within the ulnar tunnel and palm in a select South African population Exploring the bone tissue: Instrumental methods for characterization and biomedical research application Effect of metformin on the neuronal morphology of frontal cortex and hippocampal regions in lipopolysaccharide induced neuroinflammation in male Wistar rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1