{"title":"西德尼的穿透力隐喻与思想","authors":"Matthew P. Harrison","doi":"10.1086/727996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyzes how Sidney uses the metaphor of “penetration” to explore the moral and psychic effects of the encounter between poem and reader. I contextualize Sidney’s use of this metaphor, starting from a moment in the Lady of May, where the pedant Rombus reflects on the “penetrancy” of pastoral singing. Invoking both classical and Christian contexts, the term represents rhetorical force as violent and invasive, yielding different affordances than other Elizabethan metaphors for poetic influence (such as digestion, movement, or temptation). Sidney himself adopts this metaphor to yoke together two incommensurate and perhaps mutually unintelligible subject positions: penetrated and penetrator, piercing and being pierced. I juxtapose a reading of Barnabe Barnes’s use of the same metaphor, closing with a reading of the bower in the old Arcadia. In so doing, I hope to offer an alternative account of how Sidney thinks with metaphor, emphasizing not how he resolves his central tensions but rather how he sustains incompatible readings. Our disagreements over Sidney’s views of reading, of morality, and of the relation between beauty and virtue result from his poetics of metaphor and wit. [M.H.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas\",\"authors\":\"Matthew P. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/727996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay analyzes how Sidney uses the metaphor of “penetration” to explore the moral and psychic effects of the encounter between poem and reader. I contextualize Sidney’s use of this metaphor, starting from a moment in the Lady of May, where the pedant Rombus reflects on the “penetrancy” of pastoral singing. Invoking both classical and Christian contexts, the term represents rhetorical force as violent and invasive, yielding different affordances than other Elizabethan metaphors for poetic influence (such as digestion, movement, or temptation). Sidney himself adopts this metaphor to yoke together two incommensurate and perhaps mutually unintelligible subject positions: penetrated and penetrator, piercing and being pierced. I juxtapose a reading of Barnabe Barnes’s use of the same metaphor, closing with a reading of the bower in the old Arcadia. In so doing, I hope to offer an alternative account of how Sidney thinks with metaphor, emphasizing not how he resolves his central tensions but rather how he sustains incompatible readings. Our disagreements over Sidney’s views of reading, of morality, and of the relation between beauty and virtue result from his poetics of metaphor and wit. [M.H.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/727996\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay analyzes how Sidney uses the metaphor of “penetration” to explore the moral and psychic effects of the encounter between poem and reader. I contextualize Sidney’s use of this metaphor, starting from a moment in the Lady of May, where the pedant Rombus reflects on the “penetrancy” of pastoral singing. Invoking both classical and Christian contexts, the term represents rhetorical force as violent and invasive, yielding different affordances than other Elizabethan metaphors for poetic influence (such as digestion, movement, or temptation). Sidney himself adopts this metaphor to yoke together two incommensurate and perhaps mutually unintelligible subject positions: penetrated and penetrator, piercing and being pierced. I juxtapose a reading of Barnabe Barnes’s use of the same metaphor, closing with a reading of the bower in the old Arcadia. In so doing, I hope to offer an alternative account of how Sidney thinks with metaphor, emphasizing not how he resolves his central tensions but rather how he sustains incompatible readings. Our disagreements over Sidney’s views of reading, of morality, and of the relation between beauty and virtue result from his poetics of metaphor and wit. [M.H.]
期刊介绍:
English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.