{"title":"将危重病人疼痛观察工具（CPOT）改编为印度尼西亚语版本并进行跨文化验证","authors":"Luthfi Fauzy Asriyanto , Nur Chayati","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT’s criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and interrater reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument’s average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (<em>r</em>) between the CPOT and the patient’s FPT scores (0.877–0.983, <em>P</em> < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (<em>κ</em>) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739–0.834, <em>P</em> < 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001552/pdfft?md5=718e975e779fa64155a40a257fd8fcb2&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001552-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool\",\"authors\":\"Luthfi Fauzy Asriyanto , Nur Chayati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT’s criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and interrater reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument’s average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (<em>r</em>) between the CPOT and the patient’s FPT scores (0.877–0.983, <em>P</em> < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (<em>κ</em>) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739–0.834, <em>P</em> < 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001552/pdfft?md5=718e975e779fa64155a40a257fd8fcb2&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001552-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool
Objective
The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT.
Methods
The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT’s criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and interrater reliability.
Results
Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument’s average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation (r) between the CPOT and the patient’s FPT scores (0.877–0.983, P < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters (κ) revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739–0.834, P < 0.01).
Conclusion
The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC.
期刊介绍：
This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
