研发资金对创新发展水平影响的结构和比较分析:全球创新指数领导者和乌克兰的经验证据

IF 1.2 Q4 BUSINESS Innovative Marketing Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.21511/im.19(4).2023.25
Olena Dobrovolska, Ralf Sonntag, Wolfgang Ortmanns, Iryna Kadyrus, Tetyana Rudyanova
{"title":"研发资金对创新发展水平影响的结构和比较分析:全球创新指数领导者和乌克兰的经验证据","authors":"Olena Dobrovolska, Ralf Sonntag, Wolfgang Ortmanns, Iryna Kadyrus, Tetyana Rudyanova","doi":"10.21511/im.19(4).2023.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to determine the influence of the R&D expenditure structure funded by different sectors of stakeholders on the level of innovation development. The data sample involves values of GII and R&D expenditure funded by business, government, higher education, private non-profit sectors, and foreign sources for 10 countries – Ukraine and 9 top countries in GII-2022 for 2011–2020. Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis considers time lags to determine the nature and strength of relationships. For GII’s top countries, the relationship with innovation development level is confirmed as direct for funding R&D by business (in 8 from 9 countries), higher education (5 from 7), and foreign sources (5 from 9) with power from moderate to very high and 0-3-year lag. In Ukraine, the direct relationship is for financing by business (very high power and 3-year lag) and foreign sources (high power and 1-year lag). The regression modeling of dependences (Arellano-Bover/Blundell-Bond dynamic model for panel data and linear model for Ukraine) was also applied using STATA 18. In GII’s top countries, increasing the share of R&D expenditures financed by business by 1% contributes to increasing GII’s score by 0.25%, higher education – 2.47%; government, non-profit sector, and foreign sources – decreasing by 0.89%, 1.68% and 0.81% accordingly. In Ukraine, increasing financing R&D by the government by 1% leads to a similar decrease of GII estimate by 0.19% with a 2-year lag, and the business sector – an increase of 0.16% with a 3-year time lag. Vice versa, in Ukraine, R&D expenditures financed by higher education lead to GII’s score decreasing.","PeriodicalId":37060,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural and comparative analysis of R&D funding impact on the level of innovation development: The empirical evidence of GII’s leaders and Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Olena Dobrovolska, Ralf Sonntag, Wolfgang Ortmanns, Iryna Kadyrus, Tetyana Rudyanova\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/im.19(4).2023.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to determine the influence of the R&D expenditure structure funded by different sectors of stakeholders on the level of innovation development. The data sample involves values of GII and R&D expenditure funded by business, government, higher education, private non-profit sectors, and foreign sources for 10 countries – Ukraine and 9 top countries in GII-2022 for 2011–2020. Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis considers time lags to determine the nature and strength of relationships. For GII’s top countries, the relationship with innovation development level is confirmed as direct for funding R&D by business (in 8 from 9 countries), higher education (5 from 7), and foreign sources (5 from 9) with power from moderate to very high and 0-3-year lag. In Ukraine, the direct relationship is for financing by business (very high power and 3-year lag) and foreign sources (high power and 1-year lag). The regression modeling of dependences (Arellano-Bover/Blundell-Bond dynamic model for panel data and linear model for Ukraine) was also applied using STATA 18. In GII’s top countries, increasing the share of R&D expenditures financed by business by 1% contributes to increasing GII’s score by 0.25%, higher education – 2.47%; government, non-profit sector, and foreign sources – decreasing by 0.89%, 1.68% and 0.81% accordingly. In Ukraine, increasing financing R&D by the government by 1% leads to a similar decrease of GII estimate by 0.19% with a 2-year lag, and the business sector – an increase of 0.16% with a 3-year time lag. Vice versa, in Ukraine, R&D expenditures financed by higher education lead to GII’s score decreasing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/im.19(4).2023.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/im.19(4).2023.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定不同利益相关者资助的研发支出结构对创新发展水平的影响。数据样本包括 2011-2020 年 10 个国家(乌克兰和 9 个 GII-2022 年排名前列的国家)的 GII 值以及由企业、政府、高等教育、私人非营利部门和外国来源资助的 R&D 支出。Pearson/Spearman 相关性分析考虑了时间滞后因素,以确定关系的性质和强度。就全球创新指数排名靠前的国家而言,企业(9 个国家中的 8 个)、高等教育(7 个国家中的 5 个)和外国来源(9 个国家中的 5 个)的研发资金与创新发展水平的关系被确认为直接关系,强度从中等到非常高不等,滞后期为 0-3 年。在乌克兰,直接关系是企业融资(非常高,滞后 3 年)和外国来源融资(高,滞后 1 年)。此外,还使用 STATA 18 对依赖关系进行了回归建模(针对面板数据的 Arellano-Bover/Blundell-Bond 动态模型和针对乌克兰的线性模型)。在 GII 排名靠前的国家中,由企业资助的研发支出比例增加 1%,GII 的得分就会增加 0.25%;高等教育增加 2.47%;政府、非营利部门和外国来源的得分会相应减少 0.89%、1.68% 和 0.81%。在乌克兰,政府增加 1%的研发资金会导致 GII 估计值减少 0.19%(滞后 2 年),而企业部门则会增加 0.16%(滞后 3 年)。反之亦然,在乌克兰,由高等教育资助的研发支出会导致 GII 分数下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structural and comparative analysis of R&D funding impact on the level of innovation development: The empirical evidence of GII’s leaders and Ukraine
The study aims to determine the influence of the R&D expenditure structure funded by different sectors of stakeholders on the level of innovation development. The data sample involves values of GII and R&D expenditure funded by business, government, higher education, private non-profit sectors, and foreign sources for 10 countries – Ukraine and 9 top countries in GII-2022 for 2011–2020. Pearson/Spearman correlation analysis considers time lags to determine the nature and strength of relationships. For GII’s top countries, the relationship with innovation development level is confirmed as direct for funding R&D by business (in 8 from 9 countries), higher education (5 from 7), and foreign sources (5 from 9) with power from moderate to very high and 0-3-year lag. In Ukraine, the direct relationship is for financing by business (very high power and 3-year lag) and foreign sources (high power and 1-year lag). The regression modeling of dependences (Arellano-Bover/Blundell-Bond dynamic model for panel data and linear model for Ukraine) was also applied using STATA 18. In GII’s top countries, increasing the share of R&D expenditures financed by business by 1% contributes to increasing GII’s score by 0.25%, higher education – 2.47%; government, non-profit sector, and foreign sources – decreasing by 0.89%, 1.68% and 0.81% accordingly. In Ukraine, increasing financing R&D by the government by 1% leads to a similar decrease of GII estimate by 0.19% with a 2-year lag, and the business sector – an increase of 0.16% with a 3-year time lag. Vice versa, in Ukraine, R&D expenditures financed by higher education lead to GII’s score decreasing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovative Marketing
Innovative Marketing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Delighting customers: Evaluating service quality and customer satisfaction of self-checkout users in sports retail Factors influencing consumer behavior towards intention and the selection of luxury hotels in Malaysia using Theory of Planned Behavior Impact of brand name and pricing on Kazakhstan Gen Z consumer behavior The effect of social media marketing activities dimensions on value co-creation behavior: An application of the commitment-trust theory Factors influencing young consumers’ purchasing behavior toward Saudi coffee product: An application of the extended Theory of Planned Behavior model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1