Mark D. Petersen, A. Shumway, P. Powers, E. Field, M. Moschetti, K. Jaiswal, K. Milner, S. Rezaeian, Arthur D. Frankel, A. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, J. Altekruse, Sean K. Ahdi, Kyle B Withers, C. Mueller, Yuehua Zeng, Robert E Chase, Leah M Salditch, N. Luco, K. Rukstales, Julie A. Herrick, Demi L Girot, B. Aagaard, A. Bender, M. Blanpied, Richard W. Briggs, O. Boyd, B. Clayton, C. DuRoss, Eileen L. Evans, P. Haeussler, A. Hatem, K. L. Haynie, Elizabeth H. Hearn, Kaj Johnson, Zachary A Kortum, N. S. Kwong, A. Makdisi, H. B. Mason, Daniel E. McNamara, Devin F McPhillips, Paul G Okubo, M. Page, Fred F. Pollitz, J. Rubinstein, Bruce E. Shaw, Zheng-Kang Shen, Brian R Shiro, James A Smith, William J Stephenson, Eric M. Thompson, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Erin Wirth, R. Witter
{"title":"2023 年美国 50 州国家地震灾害模型:概述和影响","authors":"Mark D. Petersen, A. Shumway, P. Powers, E. Field, M. Moschetti, K. Jaiswal, K. Milner, S. Rezaeian, Arthur D. Frankel, A. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, J. Altekruse, Sean K. Ahdi, Kyle B Withers, C. Mueller, Yuehua Zeng, Robert E Chase, Leah M Salditch, N. Luco, K. Rukstales, Julie A. Herrick, Demi L Girot, B. Aagaard, A. Bender, M. Blanpied, Richard W. Briggs, O. Boyd, B. Clayton, C. DuRoss, Eileen L. Evans, P. Haeussler, A. Hatem, K. L. Haynie, Elizabeth H. Hearn, Kaj Johnson, Zachary A Kortum, N. S. Kwong, A. Makdisi, H. B. Mason, Daniel E. McNamara, Devin F McPhillips, Paul G Okubo, M. Page, Fred F. Pollitz, J. Rubinstein, Bruce E. Shaw, Zheng-Kang Shen, Brian R Shiro, James A Smith, William J Stephenson, Eric M. Thompson, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Erin Wirth, R. Witter","doi":"10.1177/87552930231215428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.","PeriodicalId":11392,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications\",\"authors\":\"Mark D. Petersen, A. Shumway, P. Powers, E. Field, M. Moschetti, K. Jaiswal, K. Milner, S. Rezaeian, Arthur D. Frankel, A. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, J. Altekruse, Sean K. Ahdi, Kyle B Withers, C. Mueller, Yuehua Zeng, Robert E Chase, Leah M Salditch, N. Luco, K. Rukstales, Julie A. Herrick, Demi L Girot, B. Aagaard, A. Bender, M. Blanpied, Richard W. Briggs, O. Boyd, B. Clayton, C. DuRoss, Eileen L. Evans, P. Haeussler, A. Hatem, K. L. Haynie, Elizabeth H. Hearn, Kaj Johnson, Zachary A Kortum, N. S. Kwong, A. Makdisi, H. B. Mason, Daniel E. McNamara, Devin F McPhillips, Paul G Okubo, M. Page, Fred F. Pollitz, J. Rubinstein, Bruce E. Shaw, Zheng-Kang Shen, Brian R Shiro, James A Smith, William J Stephenson, Eric M. Thompson, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Erin Wirth, R. Witter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87552930231215428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Spectra\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Spectra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231215428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231215428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications
The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Spectra, the professional peer-reviewed journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), serves as the publication of record for the development of earthquake engineering practice, earthquake codes and regulations, earthquake public policy, and earthquake investigation reports. The journal is published quarterly in both printed and online editions in February, May, August, and November, with additional special edition issues.
EERI established Earthquake Spectra with the purpose of improving the practice of earthquake hazards mitigation, preparedness, and recovery — serving the informational needs of the diverse professionals engaged in earthquake risk reduction: civil, geotechnical, mechanical, and structural engineers; geologists, seismologists, and other earth scientists; architects and city planners; public officials; social scientists; and researchers.