2023 年美国 50 州国家地震灾害模型:概述和影响

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Spectra Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1177/87552930231215428
Mark D. Petersen, A. Shumway, P. Powers, E. Field, M. Moschetti, K. Jaiswal, K. Milner, S. Rezaeian, Arthur D. Frankel, A. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, J. Altekruse, Sean K. Ahdi, Kyle B Withers, C. Mueller, Yuehua Zeng, Robert E Chase, Leah M Salditch, N. Luco, K. Rukstales, Julie A. Herrick, Demi L Girot, B. Aagaard, A. Bender, M. Blanpied, Richard W. Briggs, O. Boyd, B. Clayton, C. DuRoss, Eileen L. Evans, P. Haeussler, A. Hatem, K. L. Haynie, Elizabeth H. Hearn, Kaj Johnson, Zachary A Kortum, N. S. Kwong, A. Makdisi, H. B. Mason, Daniel E. McNamara, Devin F McPhillips, Paul G Okubo, M. Page, Fred F. Pollitz, J. Rubinstein, Bruce E. Shaw, Zheng-Kang Shen, Brian R Shiro, James A Smith, William J Stephenson, Eric M. Thompson, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Erin Wirth, R. Witter
{"title":"2023 年美国 50 州国家地震灾害模型:概述和影响","authors":"Mark D. Petersen, A. Shumway, P. Powers, E. Field, M. Moschetti, K. Jaiswal, K. Milner, S. Rezaeian, Arthur D. Frankel, A. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, J. Altekruse, Sean K. Ahdi, Kyle B Withers, C. Mueller, Yuehua Zeng, Robert E Chase, Leah M Salditch, N. Luco, K. Rukstales, Julie A. Herrick, Demi L Girot, B. Aagaard, A. Bender, M. Blanpied, Richard W. Briggs, O. Boyd, B. Clayton, C. DuRoss, Eileen L. Evans, P. Haeussler, A. Hatem, K. L. Haynie, Elizabeth H. Hearn, Kaj Johnson, Zachary A Kortum, N. S. Kwong, A. Makdisi, H. B. Mason, Daniel E. McNamara, Devin F McPhillips, Paul G Okubo, M. Page, Fred F. Pollitz, J. Rubinstein, Bruce E. Shaw, Zheng-Kang Shen, Brian R Shiro, James A Smith, William J Stephenson, Eric M. Thompson, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Erin Wirth, R. Witter","doi":"10.1177/87552930231215428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.","PeriodicalId":11392,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications\",\"authors\":\"Mark D. Petersen, A. Shumway, P. Powers, E. Field, M. Moschetti, K. Jaiswal, K. Milner, S. Rezaeian, Arthur D. Frankel, A. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael, J. Altekruse, Sean K. Ahdi, Kyle B Withers, C. Mueller, Yuehua Zeng, Robert E Chase, Leah M Salditch, N. Luco, K. Rukstales, Julie A. Herrick, Demi L Girot, B. Aagaard, A. Bender, M. Blanpied, Richard W. Briggs, O. Boyd, B. Clayton, C. DuRoss, Eileen L. Evans, P. Haeussler, A. Hatem, K. L. Haynie, Elizabeth H. Hearn, Kaj Johnson, Zachary A Kortum, N. S. Kwong, A. Makdisi, H. B. Mason, Daniel E. McNamara, Devin F McPhillips, Paul G Okubo, M. Page, Fred F. Pollitz, J. Rubinstein, Bruce E. Shaw, Zheng-Kang Shen, Brian R Shiro, James A Smith, William J Stephenson, Eric M. Thompson, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Erin Wirth, R. Witter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87552930231215428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Spectra\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Spectra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231215428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231215428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国国家地震危险性模型(NSHM)于 2023 年针对 50 个州进行了更新,采用了有关地震活动性、断层破裂、地动和概率技术的新科学依据,为公共政策和其他工程应用制定了实践标准(定义为重现期大于 475 年或小于 10000 年)。由于新模型考虑了更多的数据以及更新的地震破裂预测和地动成分,因此 2023 年与时间相关的地震灾害的变化(与之前的国家地震危险性模型相比既有增加也有减少)是巨大的。在开发 2023 年模型时,我们根据合著者、50 多位审稿人以及数百位灾害科学家和最终用户的建议,努力应用现有的最佳科学或适用科学,他们参加了公共研讨会并提供了技术投入。危险性评估采用了新的目录、解集算法、网格地震模型、震级缩放方程、基于断层的结构和变形模型、多断层地震破裂预测模型、半经验和模拟地动模型,以及以土壤上部 30 米和更深沉积盆地结构的剪切波速度为条件的场地放大模型。地震危害计算得出了数十万个地点的危害曲线、地动图、均一危害响应谱,以及针对 21 个振荡周期和两个峰值参数、修正麦卡利烈度以及建筑规范和其他公共政策应用所需的 8 个地点类别而开发的伪频谱加速度分解。测试表明,新模型与过去的 ShakeMap 强度观测结果一致。灵敏度和不确定性评估确保产生的地面运动与已知的灾害信息相一致,并突出了地面运动的变化范围和原因。我们制作了多种影响产品,包括建筑抗震设计标准、烈度图、规划方案以及显示潜在物理和社会影响的工程风险评估。这些应用为评估、规划和减轻未来地震的影响提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications
The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Spectra
Earthquake Spectra 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Earthquake Spectra, the professional peer-reviewed journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), serves as the publication of record for the development of earthquake engineering practice, earthquake codes and regulations, earthquake public policy, and earthquake investigation reports. The journal is published quarterly in both printed and online editions in February, May, August, and November, with additional special edition issues. EERI established Earthquake Spectra with the purpose of improving the practice of earthquake hazards mitigation, preparedness, and recovery — serving the informational needs of the diverse professionals engaged in earthquake risk reduction: civil, geotechnical, mechanical, and structural engineers; geologists, seismologists, and other earth scientists; architects and city planners; public officials; social scientists; and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Deep-neural-network model for predicting ground motion parameters using earthquake horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios Ground-motions site and event specificity: Insights from assessing a suite of simulated ground motions in the San Francisco Bay Area Analysis of site-response residuals from empirical ground-motion models to account for observed sedimentary basin effects in Wellington, New Zealand Modeling hospital resources based on global epidemiology after earthquake-related disasters Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1