Hendra Kurniawan, Nana Supriatna, Agus Mulyana, Leli Yulifar
{"title":"印尼历史教科书中对华人起义的批判性论述","authors":"Hendra Kurniawan, Nana Supriatna, Agus Mulyana, Leli Yulifar","doi":"10.24036/diakronika/vol23-iss2/341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal the discourse practices in the narrative of the Chinese Rebellion in the Indonesian History textbook. Having long disappeared from Indonesian historiography, the Chinese-Javanese alliance against the VOC, often called Geger Pacinan (1740-1743), has reappeared in history textbooks. Its presence needs to be studied to understand the discourse practices that are to be conveyed by the narratives that are constructed. This study's subject was the Chinese Rebellion text in the Indonesian History textbook for class XI SMA based on the 2013 Curriculum published by the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia in 2017. The Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method, according to Teun A. van Dijk, was used to analyze the dimensions of the text, social cognition, and the social context of the narratives that are the research subject. The result is that the report in the text dimension does not present the Chinese role through the history of the event as a whole. In the size of social cognition, it is found that there is a potential to strengthen the practice of discourse, which leads to the marginalization of the Chinese role. The social context dimension has not entirely shifted from the New Order paradigm, which harbored stereotypes against the Chinese. In conclusion, the text of the Chinese Rebellion requires the teacher’s role to make the deconstruction process in learning history meaningful for students, especially in internalizing the value of diversity for national integration.","PeriodicalId":52790,"journal":{"name":"Diakronika","volume":"14 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Discourse of the Chinese Rebellion in Indonesian History Textbook\",\"authors\":\"Hendra Kurniawan, Nana Supriatna, Agus Mulyana, Leli Yulifar\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/diakronika/vol23-iss2/341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to reveal the discourse practices in the narrative of the Chinese Rebellion in the Indonesian History textbook. Having long disappeared from Indonesian historiography, the Chinese-Javanese alliance against the VOC, often called Geger Pacinan (1740-1743), has reappeared in history textbooks. Its presence needs to be studied to understand the discourse practices that are to be conveyed by the narratives that are constructed. This study's subject was the Chinese Rebellion text in the Indonesian History textbook for class XI SMA based on the 2013 Curriculum published by the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia in 2017. The Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method, according to Teun A. van Dijk, was used to analyze the dimensions of the text, social cognition, and the social context of the narratives that are the research subject. The result is that the report in the text dimension does not present the Chinese role through the history of the event as a whole. In the size of social cognition, it is found that there is a potential to strengthen the practice of discourse, which leads to the marginalization of the Chinese role. The social context dimension has not entirely shifted from the New Order paradigm, which harbored stereotypes against the Chinese. In conclusion, the text of the Chinese Rebellion requires the teacher’s role to make the deconstruction process in learning history meaningful for students, especially in internalizing the value of diversity for national integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diakronika\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diakronika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/diakronika/vol23-iss2/341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diakronika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/diakronika/vol23-iss2/341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在揭示印尼历史教科书中关于华人起义的叙述中的话语实践。华人与爪哇人结盟反对印尼皇家海军(通常被称为 "Geger Pacinan",1740-1743 年)的历史在印尼史学界消失已久,如今却再次出现在历史教科书中。需要对它的存在进行研究,以了解所构建的叙述所要传达的话语实践。本研究的主题是印度尼西亚共和国教育与文化部于2017年出版的基于2013年课程的印度尼西亚历史教科书中十一年级SMA班的华人叛乱课文。根据Teun A. van Dijk的观点,采用批判性话语分析(CDA)方法,对作为研究对象的文本、社会认知以及叙述的社会背景等维度进行分析。结果发现,文本维度的报告并没有通过事件的历史整体呈现中国的角色。在社会认知的尺寸上,发现有可能强化话语实践,导致中国角色的边缘化。社会语境维度并未完全摆脱新秩序范式,对中国人怀有成见。总之,《华人之乱》文本需要教师发挥作用,使历史学习的解构过程对学生有意义,特别是在内化民族融合的多样性价值方面。
Critical Discourse of the Chinese Rebellion in Indonesian History Textbook
This study aims to reveal the discourse practices in the narrative of the Chinese Rebellion in the Indonesian History textbook. Having long disappeared from Indonesian historiography, the Chinese-Javanese alliance against the VOC, often called Geger Pacinan (1740-1743), has reappeared in history textbooks. Its presence needs to be studied to understand the discourse practices that are to be conveyed by the narratives that are constructed. This study's subject was the Chinese Rebellion text in the Indonesian History textbook for class XI SMA based on the 2013 Curriculum published by the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia in 2017. The Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method, according to Teun A. van Dijk, was used to analyze the dimensions of the text, social cognition, and the social context of the narratives that are the research subject. The result is that the report in the text dimension does not present the Chinese role through the history of the event as a whole. In the size of social cognition, it is found that there is a potential to strengthen the practice of discourse, which leads to the marginalization of the Chinese role. The social context dimension has not entirely shifted from the New Order paradigm, which harbored stereotypes against the Chinese. In conclusion, the text of the Chinese Rebellion requires the teacher’s role to make the deconstruction process in learning history meaningful for students, especially in internalizing the value of diversity for national integration.