向日葵、隐性残疾和高等教育中的权力不平等:残疾人全纳教育政策改革的一些重要考虑和影响

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Power and Education Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1177/17577438231225140
Anastasia Liasidou, Sotiroula Liasidou
{"title":"向日葵、隐性残疾和高等教育中的权力不平等:残疾人全纳教育政策改革的一些重要考虑和影响","authors":"Anastasia Liasidou, Sotiroula Liasidou","doi":"10.1177/17577438231225140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses recent Higher Education (HE) initiatives to introduce the Sunflower Scheme, which enables students with hidden disabilities to ‘discreetly’ indicate the existence of a disability to access support. A significant problem related to persons with hidden disabilities lies in their frequent reluctance to disclose their disabilities because of discriminatory attitudes that arise not only due to the dominance of arbitrary fabrications of ‘normalcy’ – aligned with elitist and human capital HE discourses – but also due to the lack of recognition of the existence of hidden disabilities. Even though the Scheme has been touted as a method that recognises hidden disabilities in HE, it, nevertheless, reinforces discourses of ‘misrecognition’ that create power inequities and project subordinated identities. The article argues that introducing the Scheme in HE constitutes another manifestation of disability-related initiatives that reinforce individual pathology and paternalistic discourses of dependency. The article contributes to a policy dialogue on the need to introduce alternative forms of provision to foster disability-inclusive practices in HE and makes a case to empirically capture the ‘lived experience’ of the Scheme in the context of Disability Equality policies in HE.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"27 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sunflowers, hidden disabilities and power inequities in higher education: Some critical considerations and implications for disability-inclusive education policy reforms\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Liasidou, Sotiroula Liasidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17577438231225140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses recent Higher Education (HE) initiatives to introduce the Sunflower Scheme, which enables students with hidden disabilities to ‘discreetly’ indicate the existence of a disability to access support. A significant problem related to persons with hidden disabilities lies in their frequent reluctance to disclose their disabilities because of discriminatory attitudes that arise not only due to the dominance of arbitrary fabrications of ‘normalcy’ – aligned with elitist and human capital HE discourses – but also due to the lack of recognition of the existence of hidden disabilities. Even though the Scheme has been touted as a method that recognises hidden disabilities in HE, it, nevertheless, reinforces discourses of ‘misrecognition’ that create power inequities and project subordinated identities. The article argues that introducing the Scheme in HE constitutes another manifestation of disability-related initiatives that reinforce individual pathology and paternalistic discourses of dependency. The article contributes to a policy dialogue on the need to introduce alternative forms of provision to foster disability-inclusive practices in HE and makes a case to empirically capture the ‘lived experience’ of the Scheme in the context of Disability Equality policies in HE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Power and Education\",\"volume\":\"27 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Power and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231225140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231225140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了最近高等教育(HE)引入 "向日葵计划 "的举措,该计划使隐性残疾学生能够 "谨慎 "地表明自己存在残疾,从而获得支持。与隐性残疾者有关的一个重要问题是,他们经常不愿意透露自己的残疾情况,因为歧视态度不仅是由于任意编造的 "正常"(与精英主义和人力资本高等教育论述相一致)占主导地位,还由于对隐性残疾的存在缺乏认识。尽管该计划被吹捧为承认高等教育中隐性残疾的一种方法,但它强化了 "错误承认 "的论述,造成了权力不平等和从属身份的投射。文章认为,在高等教育中引入该计划是与残疾有关的举措的另一种表现形式,这些举措强化了个人病理学和家长式的依赖论述。文章有助于开展政策对话,探讨是否有必要引入其他形式的规定,以促进高等教育中的残疾包容性实践,并提出在高等教育中的残疾平等政策背景下,以实证方式捕捉该计划的 "生活体验"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sunflowers, hidden disabilities and power inequities in higher education: Some critical considerations and implications for disability-inclusive education policy reforms
The article discusses recent Higher Education (HE) initiatives to introduce the Sunflower Scheme, which enables students with hidden disabilities to ‘discreetly’ indicate the existence of a disability to access support. A significant problem related to persons with hidden disabilities lies in their frequent reluctance to disclose their disabilities because of discriminatory attitudes that arise not only due to the dominance of arbitrary fabrications of ‘normalcy’ – aligned with elitist and human capital HE discourses – but also due to the lack of recognition of the existence of hidden disabilities. Even though the Scheme has been touted as a method that recognises hidden disabilities in HE, it, nevertheless, reinforces discourses of ‘misrecognition’ that create power inequities and project subordinated identities. The article argues that introducing the Scheme in HE constitutes another manifestation of disability-related initiatives that reinforce individual pathology and paternalistic discourses of dependency. The article contributes to a policy dialogue on the need to introduce alternative forms of provision to foster disability-inclusive practices in HE and makes a case to empirically capture the ‘lived experience’ of the Scheme in the context of Disability Equality policies in HE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Navigating classroom challenges and curriculum changes: A qualitative study of an English Teacher’s journey in the Indonesian education system Exploring the mediating role of teacher expectation on whole class participation The role of music in supporting young children’s holistic learning and wellbeing in the context of Froebel’s mother songs Debates in digital pedagogy within prisons Epistemic injustice and unwellness in the classroom: Creating knowledge like we matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1