{"title":"过度劳累和低动力症在腰背痛发病中的作用","authors":"V. A. Shirokov, N. Terekhov, A. V. Potaturko","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-12-1309-1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The pain in the lower back (BCC) has a wide distribution among the working people’s age and is a frequent cause of temporary disability. The identification of risk factors for the back pain is necessary to address expert issues and developing measures for prevention of incidence. Materials and methods. There were studied prevalence odds ratio (OR) for the development of the low back pain (LBP) in two thousand nine hundred fifteen working patients with different indicators of hardness of the labour process and levels of physical activity (PA). Results. According to the special assessment of the working conditions, the harmful (3rd) class of hardness of the labour process in comparison with the 1st and 2nd classes (optimal and permissible) increased the LBP prevalence from 31.6 to 37.1% with OR = 1.27 at 95% Ci (1.03–1.43), p <0.05. No reliable differences were obtained under comparing classes separately with the 1st class. According to the International questionnaire of physical activity, the LBP prevalence under an intensive PA is 29.3% with OR = 1.5 at 95% CI (1.6–2.11), at a low PA – 37.2% with OR = 2.15 at 95% Ci (1.07–4.3). The smallest LBP prevalence was revealed in a moderate PA mode throughout the day (21.6%). Limitations. The present study has a limitation associated with the inconsistency of cards for special assessment of working conditions and the International questionnaire cards. Conclusion. Data were obtained about the absence of reliable differences in the distribution and odds ratio for the development of LBP between workers by classes of hardness of the labour process. Workers with moderate and low PA have reliably low LBP prevalence.","PeriodicalId":13009,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and sanitation","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of physical overstrain and hypodynamia in the development of the low back pain\",\"authors\":\"V. A. Shirokov, N. Terekhov, A. V. Potaturko\",\"doi\":\"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-12-1309-1314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The pain in the lower back (BCC) has a wide distribution among the working people’s age and is a frequent cause of temporary disability. The identification of risk factors for the back pain is necessary to address expert issues and developing measures for prevention of incidence. Materials and methods. There were studied prevalence odds ratio (OR) for the development of the low back pain (LBP) in two thousand nine hundred fifteen working patients with different indicators of hardness of the labour process and levels of physical activity (PA). Results. According to the special assessment of the working conditions, the harmful (3rd) class of hardness of the labour process in comparison with the 1st and 2nd classes (optimal and permissible) increased the LBP prevalence from 31.6 to 37.1% with OR = 1.27 at 95% Ci (1.03–1.43), p <0.05. No reliable differences were obtained under comparing classes separately with the 1st class. According to the International questionnaire of physical activity, the LBP prevalence under an intensive PA is 29.3% with OR = 1.5 at 95% CI (1.6–2.11), at a low PA – 37.2% with OR = 2.15 at 95% Ci (1.07–4.3). The smallest LBP prevalence was revealed in a moderate PA mode throughout the day (21.6%). Limitations. The present study has a limitation associated with the inconsistency of cards for special assessment of working conditions and the International questionnaire cards. Conclusion. Data were obtained about the absence of reliable differences in the distribution and odds ratio for the development of LBP between workers by classes of hardness of the labour process. Workers with moderate and low PA have reliably low LBP prevalence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiene and sanitation\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiene and sanitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-12-1309-1314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and sanitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-12-1309-1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介下背部疼痛(BCC)在工作年龄段的人群中分布广泛,是导致暂时性残疾的常见原因。 要解决专家提出的问题并制定预防发病的措施,就必须确定腰痛的危险因素。 材料和方法。研究了 2 915 名劳动患者腰背痛(LBP)发病率的几率比(OR),这些患者的劳动强度和体力活动(PA)水平有不同的指标。 结果。根据对工作条件的特殊评估,与第一级和第二级(最佳和允许)相比,有害(第三级)的劳动过程硬度使腰背痛的发病率从 31.6% 上升到 37.1%,OR = 1.27,95% Ci (1.03-1.43),P <0.05。将各班级与第一班级分别进行比较,未发现可靠的差异。根据国际体力活动调查问卷,高强度体力活动的枸杞痛患病率为 29.3%,OR = 1.5,95% Ci (1.6-2.11);低强度体力活动的患病率为 37.2%,OR = 2.15,95% Ci (1.07-4.3)。全天中度活动量模式的枸杞痛发生率最小(21.6%)。 局限性。本研究的局限性在于工作条件特别评估卡与国际问卷卡不一致。 结论。本研究获得的数据表明,不同劳动强度的工人患腰椎间盘突出症的分布和几率没有可靠的差异。中度和低度劳动强度工人的枸杞多糖症发病率较低。
The role of physical overstrain and hypodynamia in the development of the low back pain
Introduction. The pain in the lower back (BCC) has a wide distribution among the working people’s age and is a frequent cause of temporary disability. The identification of risk factors for the back pain is necessary to address expert issues and developing measures for prevention of incidence. Materials and methods. There were studied prevalence odds ratio (OR) for the development of the low back pain (LBP) in two thousand nine hundred fifteen working patients with different indicators of hardness of the labour process and levels of physical activity (PA). Results. According to the special assessment of the working conditions, the harmful (3rd) class of hardness of the labour process in comparison with the 1st and 2nd classes (optimal and permissible) increased the LBP prevalence from 31.6 to 37.1% with OR = 1.27 at 95% Ci (1.03–1.43), p <0.05. No reliable differences were obtained under comparing classes separately with the 1st class. According to the International questionnaire of physical activity, the LBP prevalence under an intensive PA is 29.3% with OR = 1.5 at 95% CI (1.6–2.11), at a low PA – 37.2% with OR = 2.15 at 95% Ci (1.07–4.3). The smallest LBP prevalence was revealed in a moderate PA mode throughout the day (21.6%). Limitations. The present study has a limitation associated with the inconsistency of cards for special assessment of working conditions and the International questionnaire cards. Conclusion. Data were obtained about the absence of reliable differences in the distribution and odds ratio for the development of LBP between workers by classes of hardness of the labour process. Workers with moderate and low PA have reliably low LBP prevalence.