不同土壤耕作方法下豌豆(pisum sativum l.)的植物检疫状况

O. Savelyeva, Andrey Savelyev, O. Bukin, Aleksandr Nikolskiy, Dmitriy Bochkarev
{"title":"不同土壤耕作方法下豌豆(pisum sativum l.)的植物检疫状况","authors":"O. Savelyeva, Andrey Savelyev, O. Bukin, Aleksandr Nikolskiy, Dmitriy Bochkarev","doi":"10.12737/2073-0462-2023-46-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research was carried out to determine the influence of various systems of basic soil cultivation on the prevalence and development of pests in the agrophytocenosis of peas. The work was carried out in 2017-2019 in the Republic of Mordovia in the second rotation of the crop rotation: peas - winter wheat - soybeans - spring barley. The experimental scheme included the following options: autumn disking at 10…12 cm + moldboard plowing at 22…24 cm (disking + plowing); autumn disking with a disc harrow at 10…12 cm (disking); zero tillage (direct sowing). The use of disking and direct sowing increased the infestation of crops with young weeds, compared with plowing, by 12 and 24 weeds/m2. Plowing led to a decrease in the amount of thistle and horsetail. The prevalence of rust and gray rot in peas was largely influenced by weather conditions favorable to pathogens. In 2017 the prevalence of rust in the flowering phase was higher than in the drier years of 2018-2019 by 44...53%, gray mold - by 17...23%. The intensity of pathogen development increased as the crop matured; in the experiment, the lowest value of this indicator was against the background of disking. Plowing significantly reduced the density of the pea aphid population compared to disking (by 79%) and direct sowing (by 11%). A similar pattern was noted for gamma moth caterpillars. The results obtained can be used in the development of an integrated system for protecting peas from a complex of pests for the southern forest-steppe of the Non-Chernozem zone of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":23526,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University","volume":"337 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PHYTOSANITARY CONDITION OF PEA AGROPHYTOCOENOSES (PISUM SATIVUM L.) UNDER DIFFERENT SOIL TILLAGE METHODS\",\"authors\":\"O. Savelyeva, Andrey Savelyev, O. Bukin, Aleksandr Nikolskiy, Dmitriy Bochkarev\",\"doi\":\"10.12737/2073-0462-2023-46-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research was carried out to determine the influence of various systems of basic soil cultivation on the prevalence and development of pests in the agrophytocenosis of peas. The work was carried out in 2017-2019 in the Republic of Mordovia in the second rotation of the crop rotation: peas - winter wheat - soybeans - spring barley. The experimental scheme included the following options: autumn disking at 10…12 cm + moldboard plowing at 22…24 cm (disking + plowing); autumn disking with a disc harrow at 10…12 cm (disking); zero tillage (direct sowing). The use of disking and direct sowing increased the infestation of crops with young weeds, compared with plowing, by 12 and 24 weeds/m2. Plowing led to a decrease in the amount of thistle and horsetail. The prevalence of rust and gray rot in peas was largely influenced by weather conditions favorable to pathogens. In 2017 the prevalence of rust in the flowering phase was higher than in the drier years of 2018-2019 by 44...53%, gray mold - by 17...23%. The intensity of pathogen development increased as the crop matured; in the experiment, the lowest value of this indicator was against the background of disking. Plowing significantly reduced the density of the pea aphid population compared to disking (by 79%) and direct sowing (by 11%). A similar pattern was noted for gamma moth caterpillars. The results obtained can be used in the development of an integrated system for protecting peas from a complex of pests for the southern forest-steppe of the Non-Chernozem zone of the Russian Federation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University\",\"volume\":\"337 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12737/2073-0462-2023-46-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2073-0462-2023-46-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究旨在确定各种基本土壤耕作制度对豌豆农田害虫的发生和发展的影响。这项工作于2017-2019年在莫尔多维亚共和国进行,轮作二轮:豌豆-冬小麦-大豆-春大麦。实验方案包括以下几种:秋季10...12厘米的圆盘耙+22...24厘米的模板犁(圆盘耙+犁);秋季10...12厘米的圆盘耙(圆盘耙);零耕作(直接播种)。与犁耕相比,盘耕和直接播种增加了作物幼苗杂草的侵染,每平方米分别增加了 12 和 24 株杂草。耕地导致蓟草和马尾草的数量减少。豌豆锈病和灰霉病的流行主要受到有利于病原体的天气条件的影响。2017 年,锈病在花期的发病率比 2018-2019 年较干旱年份高出 44...53%,灰霉病--高出 17...23%。病原体发展的强度随着作物成熟而增加;在试验中,该指标的最低值是在盘耕背景下出现的。耕地比盘耕(减少 79%)和直接播种(减少 11%)大大降低了豌豆蚜虫种群密度。γ蛾毛虫的情况也类似。获得的结果可用于为俄罗斯联邦非切尔诺泽姆地区的南部森林草原开发保护豌豆免受多种害虫侵害的综合系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PHYTOSANITARY CONDITION OF PEA AGROPHYTOCOENOSES (PISUM SATIVUM L.) UNDER DIFFERENT SOIL TILLAGE METHODS
Research was carried out to determine the influence of various systems of basic soil cultivation on the prevalence and development of pests in the agrophytocenosis of peas. The work was carried out in 2017-2019 in the Republic of Mordovia in the second rotation of the crop rotation: peas - winter wheat - soybeans - spring barley. The experimental scheme included the following options: autumn disking at 10…12 cm + moldboard plowing at 22…24 cm (disking + plowing); autumn disking with a disc harrow at 10…12 cm (disking); zero tillage (direct sowing). The use of disking and direct sowing increased the infestation of crops with young weeds, compared with plowing, by 12 and 24 weeds/m2. Plowing led to a decrease in the amount of thistle and horsetail. The prevalence of rust and gray rot in peas was largely influenced by weather conditions favorable to pathogens. In 2017 the prevalence of rust in the flowering phase was higher than in the drier years of 2018-2019 by 44...53%, gray mold - by 17...23%. The intensity of pathogen development increased as the crop matured; in the experiment, the lowest value of this indicator was against the background of disking. Plowing significantly reduced the density of the pea aphid population compared to disking (by 79%) and direct sowing (by 11%). A similar pattern was noted for gamma moth caterpillars. The results obtained can be used in the development of an integrated system for protecting peas from a complex of pests for the southern forest-steppe of the Non-Chernozem zone of the Russian Federation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DIGITAL SOLUTIONS IN AGRIBUSINESS: DEVELOPING A METHODOLOGY FOR MONITORING GRAIN PRODUCTION IN THE CONTEXT OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE CONVEYOR FOR UNLOADING VEGETABLE ROOT CROPS AND POTATO TUBERS FROM STORAGE METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SOCIAL STATE OF RUSSIA IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGY OF INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS RADIANTS FOR MICROWAVE - CONVECTIVE INSTALLATIONS. SIMULATION RESULTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1