教育与人口不平等:相互关系与矛盾

Антон Путицький
{"title":"教育与人口不平等:相互关系与矛盾","authors":"Антон Путицький","doi":"10.55643/ser.4.50.2023.504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the theory of human capital, education (as well as health) is the main object of investment, which ensures an increase in labour productivity, and therefore, an increase in the volume of goods and services, on the one hand, and an increase in the income of a working person, on the other. This article continues the research of leading Ukrainian and foreign scientists to identify the main trends that determine the impact of education on population inequality.The main purpose of the article is to outline and substantiate the interrelationships and contradictions between education and inequality. For this, educational inequality was considered as inequality of access to education, inequality of access to quality education, inequality of educational chances or opportunities, inequality of educational standard, and inequality of educational results. In this context, it is determined that a significant factor influencing inequality is the dominance of instructions for obtaining higher education and the competitiveness of educated persons in the labour market. As a result of the conducted analysis, it was established that the presence of higher education not only significantly reduces the risk of poverty and increases the probability of obtaining average incomes but also significantly affects the way of life, in particular, consumer behaviour. Quality education is one of the main factors of financial security. Significantly higher monetary incomes of educated people force the latter to resort to such types of economic activity as work in a personal subsidiary economy less. The conducted analysis makes it possible to state that a higher level of education of at least one member of the household, and especially its head, is a guarantee of a lower risk of poverty. Thus, education today can be defined as the most effective and promising factor in reducing the risk of family poverty. The article proves that public investment in the education of their children is recognized as the most promising and profitable investment in their future. The study of the phenomenon of educational migration showed that it brings much more advantages to the recipient countries than to the donor countries, and therefore the inequality of the population in the donor countries will always be higher than in the recipient countries.","PeriodicalId":108264,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic relations in the digital society","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ОСВІТА І НЕРІВНІСТЬ НАСЕЛЕННЯ: ВЗАЄМОЗВ’ЯЗКИ Й СУПЕРЕЧНОСТІ\",\"authors\":\"Антон Путицький\",\"doi\":\"10.55643/ser.4.50.2023.504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the theory of human capital, education (as well as health) is the main object of investment, which ensures an increase in labour productivity, and therefore, an increase in the volume of goods and services, on the one hand, and an increase in the income of a working person, on the other. This article continues the research of leading Ukrainian and foreign scientists to identify the main trends that determine the impact of education on population inequality.The main purpose of the article is to outline and substantiate the interrelationships and contradictions between education and inequality. For this, educational inequality was considered as inequality of access to education, inequality of access to quality education, inequality of educational chances or opportunities, inequality of educational standard, and inequality of educational results. In this context, it is determined that a significant factor influencing inequality is the dominance of instructions for obtaining higher education and the competitiveness of educated persons in the labour market. As a result of the conducted analysis, it was established that the presence of higher education not only significantly reduces the risk of poverty and increases the probability of obtaining average incomes but also significantly affects the way of life, in particular, consumer behaviour. Quality education is one of the main factors of financial security. Significantly higher monetary incomes of educated people force the latter to resort to such types of economic activity as work in a personal subsidiary economy less. The conducted analysis makes it possible to state that a higher level of education of at least one member of the household, and especially its head, is a guarantee of a lower risk of poverty. Thus, education today can be defined as the most effective and promising factor in reducing the risk of family poverty. The article proves that public investment in the education of their children is recognized as the most promising and profitable investment in their future. The study of the phenomenon of educational migration showed that it brings much more advantages to the recipient countries than to the donor countries, and therefore the inequality of the population in the donor countries will always be higher than in the recipient countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-economic relations in the digital society\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-economic relations in the digital society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.4.50.2023.504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic relations in the digital society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.4.50.2023.504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人力资本理论中,教育(以及健康)是投资的主要对象,它确保了劳动生产率的提高,从而一方面增加了商品和服务的数量,另一方面增加了劳动者的收入。这篇文章的主要目的是概述和证实教育与不平等之间的相互关系和矛盾。为此,教育不平等被视为受教育机会的不平等、获得优质教育机会的不平等、教育机会或机遇的不平等、教育标准的不平等以及教育结果的不平等。在这种情况下,可以确定,影响不平等的一个重要因素是获得高等教育的指示占主导地位,以及受过教育的人在劳动力市场上的竞争力。分析结果表明,接受高等教育不仅能大大降低贫困风险,提高获得平均收入的概率,还能显著影响生活方式,特别是消费行为。优质教育是经济安全的主要因素之一。受过教育的人的货币收入明显较高,这迫使他们较少从事个人辅助经济工作等类型的经济活动。分析结果表明,家庭中至少有一名成员,尤其是户主的教育水平越高,贫困风险就越低。因此,今天的教育可以被定义为降低家庭贫困风险的最有效、最有前途的因素。文章证明,对子女教育的公共投资被认为是对其未来最有前途和最有利的投资。对教育移民现象的研究表明,教育移民给受援国带来的好处远远多于给捐助国带来的好处,因此,捐助国人口的不平等程度总是高于受援国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ОСВІТА І НЕРІВНІСТЬ НАСЕЛЕННЯ: ВЗАЄМОЗВ’ЯЗКИ Й СУПЕРЕЧНОСТІ
In the theory of human capital, education (as well as health) is the main object of investment, which ensures an increase in labour productivity, and therefore, an increase in the volume of goods and services, on the one hand, and an increase in the income of a working person, on the other. This article continues the research of leading Ukrainian and foreign scientists to identify the main trends that determine the impact of education on population inequality.The main purpose of the article is to outline and substantiate the interrelationships and contradictions between education and inequality. For this, educational inequality was considered as inequality of access to education, inequality of access to quality education, inequality of educational chances or opportunities, inequality of educational standard, and inequality of educational results. In this context, it is determined that a significant factor influencing inequality is the dominance of instructions for obtaining higher education and the competitiveness of educated persons in the labour market. As a result of the conducted analysis, it was established that the presence of higher education not only significantly reduces the risk of poverty and increases the probability of obtaining average incomes but also significantly affects the way of life, in particular, consumer behaviour. Quality education is one of the main factors of financial security. Significantly higher monetary incomes of educated people force the latter to resort to such types of economic activity as work in a personal subsidiary economy less. The conducted analysis makes it possible to state that a higher level of education of at least one member of the household, and especially its head, is a guarantee of a lower risk of poverty. Thus, education today can be defined as the most effective and promising factor in reducing the risk of family poverty. The article proves that public investment in the education of their children is recognized as the most promising and profitable investment in their future. The study of the phenomenon of educational migration showed that it brings much more advantages to the recipient countries than to the donor countries, and therefore the inequality of the population in the donor countries will always be higher than in the recipient countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF OPERATIONAL RISK ON BANKS' CAPITAL ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОННОЇ ІДЕНТИФІКАЦІЇ ТА ЕЛЕКТРОННИХ ДОВІРЧИХ ПОСЛУГ В УКРАЇНІ: ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ ВДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ Й РОЗВИТКУ В УМОВАХ ГАРМОНІЗАЦІЇ З ПРАВОМ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR ATTRACTING AND REALIZING INVESTMENTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR OF UKRAINE MODERN CHALLENGES AND THREATS TO INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF UKRAINIAN ENTERPRISES ПРАВОВІ МЕЖІ СУСПІЛЬНИХ ВІДНОСИН МІЖ ГРОМАДЯНСЬКИМ СУСПІЛЬСТВОМ ТА ОРГАНАМИ СУДОВОЇ ВЛАДИ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1