减震器特性及其对半挂车悬架系统动力学模型影响的实验和数值研究

Avicenna An-Nizhami, Nanang Budi Sriyanto, Bambang Sumiyarso, Showi Nailul Ulum, Elfrida Rizky Riadini, Ignatius Gunawan Widodo
{"title":"减震器特性及其对半挂车悬架系统动力学模型影响的实验和数值研究","authors":"Avicenna An-Nizhami, Nanang Budi Sriyanto, Bambang Sumiyarso, Showi Nailul Ulum, Elfrida Rizky Riadini, Ignatius Gunawan Widodo","doi":"10.32497/jrm.v18i3.5023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to characterized shock absorber damping for passenger comfort. The riding comfort of the vehicle has direct correlation to the damping characteristic of the shock absorber of the suspension system. Two different shock absorbers were experimentally evaluated, and their damping characteristics were integrated into a half-car model to study the vehicle's dynamic response to harmonic road disturbances. The investigation involved numerical simulations of the half-car model subjected to harmonic road disturbances, represented by a set of ordinary differential equations solved using the Dormand-Prince method. Experimental data yielded average damping forces of 502.77 N for shock-absorber #1 and 192.03 N for shock-absorber #2. Calculations resulted in damping coefficients of 3888.57 N·s/m for shock-absorber #1 and 1397.85 N·s/m for shock-absorber #2, with corresponding damping ratios of 0.29 and 0.105. These damping ratios generally aligned with typical values for passenger car shock absorbers, except for shock-absorber #2, which deviated from the expected range. The study found that at 60 km/h and 90 km/h, shock-absorber #1 with ζ=0.29 exhibited superior performance in reducing displacement amplitude compared to shock-absorber #2 at ζ=0.105. However, at 120 km/h, both shock-absorbers displayed similar responses, with shock-absorber #1 slightly surpassing shock-absorber #2 in displacement amplitude.","PeriodicalId":167086,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and Numerical Study of Shock Absorber Characterization and The Implication on The Dynamics of Half Vehicle Suspension System Model\",\"authors\":\"Avicenna An-Nizhami, Nanang Budi Sriyanto, Bambang Sumiyarso, Showi Nailul Ulum, Elfrida Rizky Riadini, Ignatius Gunawan Widodo\",\"doi\":\"10.32497/jrm.v18i3.5023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to characterized shock absorber damping for passenger comfort. The riding comfort of the vehicle has direct correlation to the damping characteristic of the shock absorber of the suspension system. Two different shock absorbers were experimentally evaluated, and their damping characteristics were integrated into a half-car model to study the vehicle's dynamic response to harmonic road disturbances. The investigation involved numerical simulations of the half-car model subjected to harmonic road disturbances, represented by a set of ordinary differential equations solved using the Dormand-Prince method. Experimental data yielded average damping forces of 502.77 N for shock-absorber #1 and 192.03 N for shock-absorber #2. Calculations resulted in damping coefficients of 3888.57 N·s/m for shock-absorber #1 and 1397.85 N·s/m for shock-absorber #2, with corresponding damping ratios of 0.29 and 0.105. These damping ratios generally aligned with typical values for passenger car shock absorbers, except for shock-absorber #2, which deviated from the expected range. The study found that at 60 km/h and 90 km/h, shock-absorber #1 with ζ=0.29 exhibited superior performance in reducing displacement amplitude compared to shock-absorber #2 at ζ=0.105. However, at 120 km/h, both shock-absorbers displayed similar responses, with shock-absorber #1 slightly surpassing shock-absorber #2 in displacement amplitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v18i3.5023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v18i3.5023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在确定减震器阻尼的特点,以提高乘客的舒适度。车辆的乘坐舒适性与悬架系统减震器的阻尼特性直接相关。对两种不同的减震器进行了实验评估,并将它们的阻尼特性整合到一个半车模型中,以研究车辆对谐波路面干扰的动态响应。研究包括对受到谐波路面扰动的半车模型进行数值模拟,该模型由一组常微分方程表示,采用 Dormand-Prince 方法求解。实验数据显示,1 号减震器的平均阻尼力为 502.77 牛顿,2 号减震器的平均阻尼力为 192.03 牛顿。计算得出 1 号减震器的阻尼系数为 3888.57 N-s/m,2 号减震器的阻尼系数为 1397.85 N-s/m,相应的阻尼比分别为 0.29 和 0.105。这些阻尼比与乘用车减震器的典型值基本一致,只有 2 号减震器偏离了预期范围。研究发现,在时速 60 公里和 90 公里时,ζ=0.29 的 1 号减震器与ζ=0.105 的 2 号减震器相比,在降低位移振幅方面表现更优。不过,在时速 120 公里时,两个减震器的反应相似,1 号减震器的位移振幅略微超过 2 号减震器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and Numerical Study of Shock Absorber Characterization and The Implication on The Dynamics of Half Vehicle Suspension System Model
This study aimed to characterized shock absorber damping for passenger comfort. The riding comfort of the vehicle has direct correlation to the damping characteristic of the shock absorber of the suspension system. Two different shock absorbers were experimentally evaluated, and their damping characteristics were integrated into a half-car model to study the vehicle's dynamic response to harmonic road disturbances. The investigation involved numerical simulations of the half-car model subjected to harmonic road disturbances, represented by a set of ordinary differential equations solved using the Dormand-Prince method. Experimental data yielded average damping forces of 502.77 N for shock-absorber #1 and 192.03 N for shock-absorber #2. Calculations resulted in damping coefficients of 3888.57 N·s/m for shock-absorber #1 and 1397.85 N·s/m for shock-absorber #2, with corresponding damping ratios of 0.29 and 0.105. These damping ratios generally aligned with typical values for passenger car shock absorbers, except for shock-absorber #2, which deviated from the expected range. The study found that at 60 km/h and 90 km/h, shock-absorber #1 with ζ=0.29 exhibited superior performance in reducing displacement amplitude compared to shock-absorber #2 at ζ=0.105. However, at 120 km/h, both shock-absorbers displayed similar responses, with shock-absorber #1 slightly surpassing shock-absorber #2 in displacement amplitude.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Desain Sistem Kontrol Mesin Presser Briket Limbah Bambu-Serbuk Kayu dengan Menggunakan PLC Mitsubishi FX 1N-60 MR-D Experimental and Numerical Study of Shock Absorber Characterization and The Implication on The Dynamics of Half Vehicle Suspension System Model Analisis Pengaruh Kecepatan Potong Terhadap Keausan Alat Potong pada Proses Pembubutan Material S50C Menggunakan Persamaan Taylor Pengaruh Jenis Oli Pelumas terhadap Laju Keausan pada Kontak Dua Jenis Material Pengaruh Kecepatan Potong Mesin CNC Laser Cutting terhadap Akurasi Potong untuk Efisiensi Proses Blanking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1