伦理拓扑学:人类学对 "家 "现象的研究

A. L. Razava
{"title":"伦理拓扑学:人类学对 \"家 \"现象的研究","authors":"A. L. Razava","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-6-29-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The purpose of the article is to consider the phenomenon of the Home in the philosophical and anthropological aspect, to show the prospects of studying the topology of human existence in the form of the immediate environment and everyday practices, set through ethos as an immanent norm of human existence. To do this, an attempt is made to define the boundaries of the Home as a space of human self-sufficiency, and ethos as a condition for the possibility of understanding communication and connection between the individual and their external environment, which allows us to return to the conceptual consideration of the ultimate foundations of human existence.Methodology and sources. An attempt is made on the basis of a critical analysis of nonclassical and post-classical philosophy (phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism) to consider the process of deconstruction of the foundations of human existence. Based on such concepts as the “Lebenswelt” by E. Husserl, “Dasein” by M. Heidegger, studies of the space of human existence by M. Merleau-Ponty and U. Eko, and definitions of the ethos by P. Bourdieu, the main boundaries of the phenomenon of the Home are determined, which is introduced into the discourse of philosophical anthropology.Results and discussion. The phenomenon of the Home, considered in the anthropological aspect, allows us to interpret the goal of the civilization development process as the “domestication” of being, the construction of an “inhabited world”, in which an individual gets the opportunity to realize their existence in an event with “his others”. The life world is formed as a constant movement of the inhabitants of the home, their active, understanding communication within the boundaries of a common space and a common way of life, its forms and rules, that is, a common ethos.Conclusion. As a condition of the human way of being and its ultimate basis, can be considered Home as a community of I and “its others”, having its own topology, the relationship between which is set by a unique ethos.","PeriodicalId":505315,"journal":{"name":"Discourse","volume":"50 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topology of Ethos: Anthropology Study of the Phenomenon of Home\",\"authors\":\"A. L. Razava\",\"doi\":\"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-6-29-43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The purpose of the article is to consider the phenomenon of the Home in the philosophical and anthropological aspect, to show the prospects of studying the topology of human existence in the form of the immediate environment and everyday practices, set through ethos as an immanent norm of human existence. To do this, an attempt is made to define the boundaries of the Home as a space of human self-sufficiency, and ethos as a condition for the possibility of understanding communication and connection between the individual and their external environment, which allows us to return to the conceptual consideration of the ultimate foundations of human existence.Methodology and sources. An attempt is made on the basis of a critical analysis of nonclassical and post-classical philosophy (phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism) to consider the process of deconstruction of the foundations of human existence. Based on such concepts as the “Lebenswelt” by E. Husserl, “Dasein” by M. Heidegger, studies of the space of human existence by M. Merleau-Ponty and U. Eko, and definitions of the ethos by P. Bourdieu, the main boundaries of the phenomenon of the Home are determined, which is introduced into the discourse of philosophical anthropology.Results and discussion. The phenomenon of the Home, considered in the anthropological aspect, allows us to interpret the goal of the civilization development process as the “domestication” of being, the construction of an “inhabited world”, in which an individual gets the opportunity to realize their existence in an event with “his others”. The life world is formed as a constant movement of the inhabitants of the home, their active, understanding communication within the boundaries of a common space and a common way of life, its forms and rules, that is, a common ethos.Conclusion. As a condition of the human way of being and its ultimate basis, can be considered Home as a community of I and “its others”, having its own topology, the relationship between which is set by a unique ethos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse\",\"volume\":\"50 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-6-29-43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-6-29-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。本文旨在从哲学和人类学的角度探讨 "家园 "现象,通过伦理这一人类生存的内在准则,展示以直接环境和日常实践的形式研究人类生存拓扑结构的前景。为此,我们试图界定作为人类自给自足空间的 "家 "的边界,以及作为理解个人与其外部环境之间的沟通和联系的可能性条件的伦理,这使我们能够回到对人类生存的终极基础的概念性思考。在对非经典和后经典哲学(现象学、存在主义、结构主义)进行批判性分析的基础上,尝试对人类生存基础的解构过程进行思考。根据胡塞尔(E. Husserl)的 "生活世界"(Lebenswelt)、海德格尔(M. Heidegger)的 "存在"(Dasein)、梅洛-庞蒂(M. Merleau-Ponty)和埃科(U. Eko)对人类生存空间的研究以及布尔迪厄(P. Bourdieu)对伦理的定义等概念,确定了 "家 "现象的主要界限,并将其引入哲学人类学的论述中。从人类学的角度看 "家园 "现象,我们可以将文明发展进程的目标解释为存在的 "驯化"、"居住世界 "的构建,在 "居住世界 "中,个体有机会在与 "他者 "的活动中实现自己的存在。生活世界的形成是家庭居民的不断流动,是他们在共同的空间和共同的生活方式、形式和规则(即共同的精神)的范围内进行的积极的、相互理解的交流。作为人类生存方式的一个条件和最终基础,可以将家视为我和 "他者 "的共同体,它有自己的拓扑结构,它们之间的关系是由独特的精神气质决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Topology of Ethos: Anthropology Study of the Phenomenon of Home
Introduction. The purpose of the article is to consider the phenomenon of the Home in the philosophical and anthropological aspect, to show the prospects of studying the topology of human existence in the form of the immediate environment and everyday practices, set through ethos as an immanent norm of human existence. To do this, an attempt is made to define the boundaries of the Home as a space of human self-sufficiency, and ethos as a condition for the possibility of understanding communication and connection between the individual and their external environment, which allows us to return to the conceptual consideration of the ultimate foundations of human existence.Methodology and sources. An attempt is made on the basis of a critical analysis of nonclassical and post-classical philosophy (phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism) to consider the process of deconstruction of the foundations of human existence. Based on such concepts as the “Lebenswelt” by E. Husserl, “Dasein” by M. Heidegger, studies of the space of human existence by M. Merleau-Ponty and U. Eko, and definitions of the ethos by P. Bourdieu, the main boundaries of the phenomenon of the Home are determined, which is introduced into the discourse of philosophical anthropology.Results and discussion. The phenomenon of the Home, considered in the anthropological aspect, allows us to interpret the goal of the civilization development process as the “domestication” of being, the construction of an “inhabited world”, in which an individual gets the opportunity to realize their existence in an event with “his others”. The life world is formed as a constant movement of the inhabitants of the home, their active, understanding communication within the boundaries of a common space and a common way of life, its forms and rules, that is, a common ethos.Conclusion. As a condition of the human way of being and its ultimate basis, can be considered Home as a community of I and “its others”, having its own topology, the relationship between which is set by a unique ethos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mediatization of the Ecological Security in the English Media: Corpus-Assisted Approach On the Theoretically Possible Number of Cases in Natural Language Representation of a Scientific Supervisor in Internet-Memes The Modification of Mythological Archetypes “son” and “father” in Joyce's Novel “Ulysses” The Development of the Berliner as a Political Person under the Influence of the Urban Cultural Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1