"透明质酸填充剂的内聚性" :使用多重内聚力测试进行评估

Kyun Tae Kim, Won Lee, Eun-Jung Yang
{"title":"\"透明质酸填充剂的内聚性\" :使用多重内聚力测试进行评估","authors":"Kyun Tae Kim, Won Lee, Eun-Jung Yang","doi":"10.1055/a-2234-1019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hyaluronic acid fillers can be manufactured using various processes. They have multiple properties, including their concentration, degree of modification, and rheological data. Cohesion is one such property to evaluate gel integrity; however, there is no standardized method for calculating this parameter. This study aimed to evaluate different tests for calculating hyaluronic acid cohesion and discuss the importance of hyaluronic acid cohesion as a consideration when selecting fillers. Methods: The cohesion levels of five different hyaluronic acid fillers with different rheological properties were evaluated and compared using the drop weight, compression, tack, and dispersion time tests. Results: The cohesion tests yielded different results in the samples. Samples 2 and 4 showed approximately two times the number of droplets when compared to Sample 5 in drop test. Samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were superior to Sample 5 in tack test. Samples 1, 2, 3 showed cohesive appearances at 95 sec in most cases in dispersion test. Rheological test results did not reflect the measures of cohesion. Conclusions: Although there are no definite standardized tests to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers, our proposed tests showed similar results for different hyaluronic acid filler products. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers and determine the clinical use of this distinguishing characteristic for clinicians selecting the product of choice.","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Cohesiveness of hyaluronic acid fillers” : Evaluation using multiple cohesion tests\",\"authors\":\"Kyun Tae Kim, Won Lee, Eun-Jung Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2234-1019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hyaluronic acid fillers can be manufactured using various processes. They have multiple properties, including their concentration, degree of modification, and rheological data. Cohesion is one such property to evaluate gel integrity; however, there is no standardized method for calculating this parameter. This study aimed to evaluate different tests for calculating hyaluronic acid cohesion and discuss the importance of hyaluronic acid cohesion as a consideration when selecting fillers. Methods: The cohesion levels of five different hyaluronic acid fillers with different rheological properties were evaluated and compared using the drop weight, compression, tack, and dispersion time tests. Results: The cohesion tests yielded different results in the samples. Samples 2 and 4 showed approximately two times the number of droplets when compared to Sample 5 in drop test. Samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were superior to Sample 5 in tack test. Samples 1, 2, 3 showed cohesive appearances at 95 sec in most cases in dispersion test. Rheological test results did not reflect the measures of cohesion. Conclusions: Although there are no definite standardized tests to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers, our proposed tests showed similar results for different hyaluronic acid filler products. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers and determine the clinical use of this distinguishing characteristic for clinicians selecting the product of choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2234-1019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2234-1019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:透明质酸填充剂可通过各种工艺制造。它们具有多种特性,包括浓度、改性程度和流变数据。内聚力是评估凝胶完整性的属性之一;然而,目前还没有计算这一参数的标准化方法。本研究旨在评估计算透明质酸内聚力的不同测试方法,并讨论选择填充剂时考虑透明质酸内聚力的重要性。 方法:使用滴重、压缩、粘性和分散时间测试对五种不同流变特性的透明质酸填充剂的内聚力水平进行评估和比较。 结果:内聚力测试得出了不同的结果:不同样品的内聚力测试结果各不相同。与样品 5 相比,样品 2 和样品 4 在滴落测试中显示的液滴数量大约是样品 5 的两倍。在粘性测试中,样品 1、2、3 和 4 优于样品 5。在大多数情况下,样品 1、2、3 在分散测试中 95 秒时会出现凝聚现象。流变测试结果并不能反映内聚力的测量结果。结论虽然目前还没有明确的标准测试来评估透明质酸填充剂的内聚力,但我们提出的测试结果显示,不同的透明质酸填充剂产品具有相似的结果。还需要进一步的研究来评估透明质酸填充剂的内聚力,并确定临床医生在选择产品时这一区别特征的临床用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Cohesiveness of hyaluronic acid fillers” : Evaluation using multiple cohesion tests
Background: Hyaluronic acid fillers can be manufactured using various processes. They have multiple properties, including their concentration, degree of modification, and rheological data. Cohesion is one such property to evaluate gel integrity; however, there is no standardized method for calculating this parameter. This study aimed to evaluate different tests for calculating hyaluronic acid cohesion and discuss the importance of hyaluronic acid cohesion as a consideration when selecting fillers. Methods: The cohesion levels of five different hyaluronic acid fillers with different rheological properties were evaluated and compared using the drop weight, compression, tack, and dispersion time tests. Results: The cohesion tests yielded different results in the samples. Samples 2 and 4 showed approximately two times the number of droplets when compared to Sample 5 in drop test. Samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were superior to Sample 5 in tack test. Samples 1, 2, 3 showed cohesive appearances at 95 sec in most cases in dispersion test. Rheological test results did not reflect the measures of cohesion. Conclusions: Although there are no definite standardized tests to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers, our proposed tests showed similar results for different hyaluronic acid filler products. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers and determine the clinical use of this distinguishing characteristic for clinicians selecting the product of choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Guidelines and Technical Tips for Neck Aesthetics with Botulinum Toxin Comparison of Effects of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap on Radiation-induced Peri-implant Capsular Contracture in a Rabbit Model Injectable "Skin Boosters" in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview Case series and literature review of up-to-date surgical management of occipital neuralgia Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1