{"title":"治疗胫骨轴骨折的联合骨合成术","authors":"K. A. Klyshnikov, N. V. Sazonova, A. Popkov","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-6-635-639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Widespread use of intramedullary and extramedullary implants, as well as external fixation devices, has demonstrated that current surgical methods are not always successful.The study aimed to assess the efficiency of a combination of transosseous osteosynthesis with intramedullary reinforcement using elastic titanium hydroxyapatite-coated rods (HA-rods) in long bone fracture treatment.Material and methods Medical records of 40 patients aged from 18 to 55 years with closed diaphyseal tibia fractures of A1-A3 type (AO/ASIF) treated with the Ilizarov transosseous osteosynthesis method combined with intramedullary elastic HA-coated wires were analysed. Result Ilizarov fixator removal was performed on average 45.3 ± 14.7 days after surgery. Radiological signs of bone union (immature callus, patterns of periosteal and endosteal stratifications overlapping the fracture line) were visible by week 3 to 4.Discussion Соmbination of the external fixator and intramedullary elastic HA-coated wires overcomes shortcomings of both external and internal means of fixation. External osteosynthesis provides advantages of the Ilizarov method: preservation of blood supply, absence of soft tissue injury, joint function and early weightbearing. Elastic intramedullary wires do not injure a. nutricia and mechanically stimulate endosteal and periosteal bone formation.Conclusion The advantages of combined osteosynthesis provide reduction of Ilizarov apparatus fixation time, reduction in the number of wires and half-pins in the frame assembly, stimulation of bone callus formation and prevention of secondary bone fragment displacement.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"54 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined osteosynthesis for tibial shaft fracture treatment\",\"authors\":\"K. A. Klyshnikov, N. V. Sazonova, A. Popkov\",\"doi\":\"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-6-635-639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Widespread use of intramedullary and extramedullary implants, as well as external fixation devices, has demonstrated that current surgical methods are not always successful.The study aimed to assess the efficiency of a combination of transosseous osteosynthesis with intramedullary reinforcement using elastic titanium hydroxyapatite-coated rods (HA-rods) in long bone fracture treatment.Material and methods Medical records of 40 patients aged from 18 to 55 years with closed diaphyseal tibia fractures of A1-A3 type (AO/ASIF) treated with the Ilizarov transosseous osteosynthesis method combined with intramedullary elastic HA-coated wires were analysed. Result Ilizarov fixator removal was performed on average 45.3 ± 14.7 days after surgery. Radiological signs of bone union (immature callus, patterns of periosteal and endosteal stratifications overlapping the fracture line) were visible by week 3 to 4.Discussion Соmbination of the external fixator and intramedullary elastic HA-coated wires overcomes shortcomings of both external and internal means of fixation. External osteosynthesis provides advantages of the Ilizarov method: preservation of blood supply, absence of soft tissue injury, joint function and early weightbearing. Elastic intramedullary wires do not injure a. nutricia and mechanically stimulate endosteal and periosteal bone formation.Conclusion The advantages of combined osteosynthesis provide reduction of Ilizarov apparatus fixation time, reduction in the number of wires and half-pins in the frame assembly, stimulation of bone callus formation and prevention of secondary bone fragment displacement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genij Ortopedii\",\"volume\":\"54 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genij Ortopedii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-6-635-639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-6-635-639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined osteosynthesis for tibial shaft fracture treatment
Introduction Widespread use of intramedullary and extramedullary implants, as well as external fixation devices, has demonstrated that current surgical methods are not always successful.The study aimed to assess the efficiency of a combination of transosseous osteosynthesis with intramedullary reinforcement using elastic titanium hydroxyapatite-coated rods (HA-rods) in long bone fracture treatment.Material and methods Medical records of 40 patients aged from 18 to 55 years with closed diaphyseal tibia fractures of A1-A3 type (AO/ASIF) treated with the Ilizarov transosseous osteosynthesis method combined with intramedullary elastic HA-coated wires were analysed. Result Ilizarov fixator removal was performed on average 45.3 ± 14.7 days after surgery. Radiological signs of bone union (immature callus, patterns of periosteal and endosteal stratifications overlapping the fracture line) were visible by week 3 to 4.Discussion Соmbination of the external fixator and intramedullary elastic HA-coated wires overcomes shortcomings of both external and internal means of fixation. External osteosynthesis provides advantages of the Ilizarov method: preservation of blood supply, absence of soft tissue injury, joint function and early weightbearing. Elastic intramedullary wires do not injure a. nutricia and mechanically stimulate endosteal and periosteal bone formation.Conclusion The advantages of combined osteosynthesis provide reduction of Ilizarov apparatus fixation time, reduction in the number of wires and half-pins in the frame assembly, stimulation of bone callus formation and prevention of secondary bone fragment displacement.
期刊介绍:
Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems