戏剧在埃斯钦尼斯与德摩斯梯尼之争中的作用:外交视角

Francesca Gazzano
{"title":"戏剧在埃斯钦尼斯与德摩斯梯尼之争中的作用:外交视角","authors":"Francesca Gazzano","doi":"10.7358/erga-2023-002-gazf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The place of theatre in the Aeschines-Demosthenes dispute: the diplomatic perspective In all studies on the affinities and intersections, both thematic and performative, between oratory and theatre, the contrasting orations of Aeschines and Demosthenes concerning the embassies to Philip of 346 BC and the mutual accusations about the handling of negotiations hold an essential place. In this set of speeches, which includes – in addition to Aeschines’ Against Timarchus and the two orations On the False Embassy (343) – those of 330 Against Ctesiphon (Aeschines) and On the Crown (Demosthenes), the theatre and its performers are, however, represented ambiguously, if not negatively. This essay aims to highlight how this apparent paradox finds a possible solution by considering the concrete role that Athenian theatre and actors played in the difficult negotiations between Athens and Philip. The diplomatic perspective allows us to shed more light on the motivations that led the two rival orators to use theatre as a weapon to fight each other.","PeriodicalId":503974,"journal":{"name":"Erga-Logoi. Rivista di storia, letteratura, diritto e culture dell'antichità","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Il ruolo del teatro nella contesa fra Eschine e Demostene: la prospettiva diplomatica\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Gazzano\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/erga-2023-002-gazf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The place of theatre in the Aeschines-Demosthenes dispute: the diplomatic perspective In all studies on the affinities and intersections, both thematic and performative, between oratory and theatre, the contrasting orations of Aeschines and Demosthenes concerning the embassies to Philip of 346 BC and the mutual accusations about the handling of negotiations hold an essential place. In this set of speeches, which includes – in addition to Aeschines’ Against Timarchus and the two orations On the False Embassy (343) – those of 330 Against Ctesiphon (Aeschines) and On the Crown (Demosthenes), the theatre and its performers are, however, represented ambiguously, if not negatively. This essay aims to highlight how this apparent paradox finds a possible solution by considering the concrete role that Athenian theatre and actors played in the difficult negotiations between Athens and Philip. The diplomatic perspective allows us to shed more light on the motivations that led the two rival orators to use theatre as a weapon to fight each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erga-Logoi. Rivista di storia, letteratura, diritto e culture dell'antichità\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erga-Logoi. Rivista di storia, letteratura, diritto e culture dell'antichità\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2023-002-gazf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erga-Logoi. Rivista di storia, letteratura, diritto e culture dell'antichità","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2023-002-gazf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 戏剧在埃斯钦尼-德摩斯梯尼之争中的地位:外交视角 在所有关于演说和戏剧之间的亲缘关系和交叉关系(包括主题和表演)的研究中,埃斯钦尼和德摩斯梯尼关于公元前 346 年派往腓力的使节的对立演说以及关于谈判处理的相互指责占据了重要地位。在这组演说中,除了埃斯钦尼斯的《反蒂马库斯》和《论虚假使团》(343 年)这两篇演说之外,还包括 330 年的《反克特西丰》(埃斯钦尼斯)和《论王冠》(德摩斯梯尼),戏剧及其表演者的形象即使不是负面的,也是模棱两可的。本文旨在通过考虑雅典戏剧和演员在雅典与菲利普之间艰难谈判中所扮演的具体角色,强调这一明显的悖论如何找到可能的解决方案。通过外交视角,我们可以更清楚地了解导致两个敌对演说家利用戏剧作为武器相互斗争的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Il ruolo del teatro nella contesa fra Eschine e Demostene: la prospettiva diplomatica
Abstract The place of theatre in the Aeschines-Demosthenes dispute: the diplomatic perspective In all studies on the affinities and intersections, both thematic and performative, between oratory and theatre, the contrasting orations of Aeschines and Demosthenes concerning the embassies to Philip of 346 BC and the mutual accusations about the handling of negotiations hold an essential place. In this set of speeches, which includes – in addition to Aeschines’ Against Timarchus and the two orations On the False Embassy (343) – those of 330 Against Ctesiphon (Aeschines) and On the Crown (Demosthenes), the theatre and its performers are, however, represented ambiguously, if not negatively. This essay aims to highlight how this apparent paradox finds a possible solution by considering the concrete role that Athenian theatre and actors played in the difficult negotiations between Athens and Philip. The diplomatic perspective allows us to shed more light on the motivations that led the two rival orators to use theatre as a weapon to fight each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Theophania of Apollo: a New Approach to the Proem of Parmenides and the Topography of the Sanctuary of Delphi Old Latin bouerum and Iouerum from a Diachronic Point of View Mediating, Arbitrating, Crossing Borders Constantly: Athletes as Envoys «For the ages and for right now»: un’analisi dell’Antigone (2019) 229 di Merlynn Tong, con un’intervista all’autrice Agrippina Minore e l’ager Clusinus: una nuova attestazione epigrafica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1