评估土耳其中学 5-7 年级社会课教科书中的问题根据 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类法对土耳其中学五至七年级社会课教科书中的问题进行评估

Deniz Yüceer, Güneş Kılınç, Sevgi COŞKUN KESKİN
{"title":"评估土耳其中学 5-7 年级社会课教科书中的问题根据 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类法对土耳其中学五至七年级社会课教科书中的问题进行评估","authors":"Deniz Yüceer, Güneş Kılınç, Sevgi COŞKUN KESKİN","doi":"10.17556/erziefd.1316446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, questions in 5th, 6th, and 7th grade social studies textbooks were evaluated using Gallagher and Aschner's question categorization to determine their level. A document analysis was conducted; the single screening model, one of the screening models, was used in this study. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis. Depending on the Gallagher and Aschner question classification, four themes were identified: cognitive memory, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and evaluative thinking. The ratio of questions to instructional time in the learning domains was evaluated to determine which level was most intensive. As a result, questions focus on cognitive memory and convergent thinking; divergent and evaluative thinking is undervalued; children's abilities in remembering, identifying, deciding, comparing, making connections, summarizing, offering examples, and interpreting are emphasized. In addition, the level of questions directed to children during and after instruction was found to vary and not be evenly distributed across learning areas.","PeriodicalId":503115,"journal":{"name":"Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TÜRKİYEDEKİ ORTAOKUL 5-7. SINIF SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERS KİTAPLARINDA YER ALAN SORULARIN GALLAGHER VE ASCHNER’IN SORU SINIFLAMASINA GÖRE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Yüceer, Güneş Kılınç, Sevgi COŞKUN KESKİN\",\"doi\":\"10.17556/erziefd.1316446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, questions in 5th, 6th, and 7th grade social studies textbooks were evaluated using Gallagher and Aschner's question categorization to determine their level. A document analysis was conducted; the single screening model, one of the screening models, was used in this study. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis. Depending on the Gallagher and Aschner question classification, four themes were identified: cognitive memory, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and evaluative thinking. The ratio of questions to instructional time in the learning domains was evaluated to determine which level was most intensive. As a result, questions focus on cognitive memory and convergent thinking; divergent and evaluative thinking is undervalued; children's abilities in remembering, identifying, deciding, comparing, making connections, summarizing, offering examples, and interpreting are emphasized. In addition, the level of questions directed to children during and after instruction was found to vary and not be evenly distributed across learning areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1316446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1316446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类法对五、六、七年级社会课教科书中的问题进行了评估,以确定其水平。对文件进行了分析;本研究采用了单一筛选模式,即筛选模式之一。数据分析采用了描述性分析。根据 Gallagher 和 Aschner 的问题分类,确定了四个主题:认知记忆、聚合思维、发散思维和评价思维。对学习领域中问题与教学时间的比例进行了评估,以确定哪个层次的问题最密集。结果是,问题侧重于认知记忆和聚合思维;发散思维和评价思维被低估;儿童在记忆、识别、判断、比较、建立联系、总结、举例和解释方面的能力被强调。此外,还发现在教学过程中和教学结束后,向儿童提出的问题水平参差不齐,在各学习领域的分布也不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TÜRKİYEDEKİ ORTAOKUL 5-7. SINIF SOSYAL BİLGİLER DERS KİTAPLARINDA YER ALAN SORULARIN GALLAGHER VE ASCHNER’IN SORU SINIFLAMASINA GÖRE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
In this study, questions in 5th, 6th, and 7th grade social studies textbooks were evaluated using Gallagher and Aschner's question categorization to determine their level. A document analysis was conducted; the single screening model, one of the screening models, was used in this study. Descriptive analysis was used for data analysis. Depending on the Gallagher and Aschner question classification, four themes were identified: cognitive memory, convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and evaluative thinking. The ratio of questions to instructional time in the learning domains was evaluated to determine which level was most intensive. As a result, questions focus on cognitive memory and convergent thinking; divergent and evaluative thinking is undervalued; children's abilities in remembering, identifying, deciding, comparing, making connections, summarizing, offering examples, and interpreting are emphasized. In addition, the level of questions directed to children during and after instruction was found to vary and not be evenly distributed across learning areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lise Öğrencilerinin Kariyer Kaygılarını Yordamada Kariyer Bilinci ve Mesleki Kararsızlığın Rolü Relationships Between the Dark Triad and Schwartz's Circumplex of Values on High School Students Gaziantep’te Yaşayan Yabancı Uyruklu ve Türk Ebeveynlerin Kapsayıcı Eğitim Bağlamında Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinden Beklentileri Akıcı Okumayı Geliştirme: Bir Eylem Araştırması A Thorough Investigation into Foreign Language Writing Anxiety in a Turkish EFL Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1