{"title":"传记与小说帕奈特-伊斯特拉蒂的矛盾--训诂学家的陷阱","authors":"Gabriela Gavril","doi":"10.4467/20843917rc.23.018.18512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biography and Fiction. The Contradictions of Panait Istrati – Traps for Exegetes The proposed text is an excerpt from a larger study devoted to the writings of Panait Istrati. It aims to highlight the importance of literary history for a more accurate understanding of the reception of Panait Istrati in Romania, especially in the interwar period, taking a critical distance from the thesis of the author’s “marginalization” in Romanian and French literature. By researching Istrati’s articles from several decades and his correspondence with Romain Rolland, the study describes the contradictions of the author, the process of fictionalization of his biography, the invention of “roles” and the construction of a “personal myth”.","PeriodicalId":506885,"journal":{"name":"Numéro spécial","volume":"421 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biografie și ficțiune. Contradicțiile lui Panait Istrati – capcane pentru exegeți\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Gavril\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/20843917rc.23.018.18512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biography and Fiction. The Contradictions of Panait Istrati – Traps for Exegetes The proposed text is an excerpt from a larger study devoted to the writings of Panait Istrati. It aims to highlight the importance of literary history for a more accurate understanding of the reception of Panait Istrati in Romania, especially in the interwar period, taking a critical distance from the thesis of the author’s “marginalization” in Romanian and French literature. By researching Istrati’s articles from several decades and his correspondence with Romain Rolland, the study describes the contradictions of the author, the process of fictionalization of his biography, the invention of “roles” and the construction of a “personal myth”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Numéro spécial\",\"volume\":\"421 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Numéro spécial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917rc.23.018.18512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Numéro spécial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917rc.23.018.18512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
传记与小说。帕奈特-伊斯特拉蒂的矛盾之处--注释者的陷阱》(The Contradictions of Panait Istrati - Traps for Exegetes) 这篇论文是专门研究帕奈特-伊斯特拉蒂著作的大型研究报告的节选。该文旨在强调文学史对于更准确地理解罗马尼亚,尤其是战时罗马尼亚对帕奈特-伊斯特拉蒂的接受情况的重要性,与关于作者在罗马尼亚和法国文学中被 "边缘化 "的论点保持一定距离。通过研究伊斯特拉蒂几十年来的文章以及他与罗曼-罗兰的通信,该研究描述了作者的矛盾之处、其传记的虚构过程、"角色 "的发明以及 "个人神话 "的构建。
Biografie și ficțiune. Contradicțiile lui Panait Istrati – capcane pentru exegeți
Biography and Fiction. The Contradictions of Panait Istrati – Traps for Exegetes The proposed text is an excerpt from a larger study devoted to the writings of Panait Istrati. It aims to highlight the importance of literary history for a more accurate understanding of the reception of Panait Istrati in Romania, especially in the interwar period, taking a critical distance from the thesis of the author’s “marginalization” in Romanian and French literature. By researching Istrati’s articles from several decades and his correspondence with Romain Rolland, the study describes the contradictions of the author, the process of fictionalization of his biography, the invention of “roles” and the construction of a “personal myth”.