在阿多诺作品集前

János Weiss
{"title":"在阿多诺作品集前","authors":"János Weiss","doi":"10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By this compilation we celebrate Adorno’s 120th birthday. Adorno’s lecture points to the importance of criticism for a future theory of aesthetics, while Gorsen questions the narrowing of the object of aesthetics to the analysis of canonized works, stressing that art thereby loses the subversive potential to which it was attributed for the student movements. In their interpretations, the authors reconstruct Adorno’s concept of “late work” and his analysis of the culture industry, and carry out a comparative analysis of Adorno and Deleuze.","PeriodicalId":508302,"journal":{"name":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Egy Adorno-összeállítás elé\",\"authors\":\"János Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By this compilation we celebrate Adorno’s 120th birthday. Adorno’s lecture points to the importance of criticism for a future theory of aesthetics, while Gorsen questions the narrowing of the object of aesthetics to the analysis of canonized works, stressing that art thereby loses the subversive potential to which it was attributed for the student movements. In their interpretations, the authors reconstruct Adorno’s concept of “late work” and his analysis of the culture industry, and carry out a comparative analysis of Adorno and Deleuze.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过这本合集庆祝阿多诺诞辰 120 周年。阿多诺的演讲指出了批评对于未来美学理论的重要性,而戈森则质疑将美学的对象缩小到对经典作品的分析,强调艺术因此失去了学生运动赋予它的颠覆性潜力。在阐释中,作者重构了阿多诺的 "晚期作品 "概念及其对文化产业的分析,并对阿多诺和德勒兹进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Egy Adorno-összeállítás elé
By this compilation we celebrate Adorno’s 120th birthday. Adorno’s lecture points to the importance of criticism for a future theory of aesthetics, while Gorsen questions the narrowing of the object of aesthetics to the analysis of canonized works, stressing that art thereby loses the subversive potential to which it was attributed for the student movements. In their interpretations, the authors reconstruct Adorno’s concept of “late work” and his analysis of the culture industry, and carry out a comparative analysis of Adorno and Deleuze.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Filozófiai észrevételek a nyugati világ alapértékeiről "Mediatizált közösségek, identitásformáló narratívák és változó hagyományfogalom az információ korában" Egyetemes érvényűek-e a nyugati hagyományból merített „európai értékek”? Az identitás maga az üzenet. A tömegmédiumok szerepe a nemzeti nagycsoportok identitásának hagyományozásában A hagyomány klasszikus és kortárs diskurzusai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1