利比亚和叙利亚的保护责任(R2P):分析相互竞争的规范性论述

Marella BODUR ÜN, Tuğçe Kelleci̇
{"title":"利比亚和叙利亚的保护责任(R2P):分析相互竞争的规范性论述","authors":"Marella BODUR ÜN, Tuğçe Kelleci̇","doi":"10.58699/tyir.1353781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2011, based on the R2P principles, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) authorized a military intervention led by NATO in Libya to “protect civilians”. Yet, the UNSC could not agree on sanctions or military action to protect civilians in Syria. Analyzing the relevant UNSC resolutions, official documents, and formal statements of state representatives, this study aims to uncover the discursive practices around military interventions. More specifically, it explores official discourses that legitimized the NATO-led military intervention in Libya and non-intervention in Syria. A comparative analysis of the Libyan and Syrian cases presents us with an opportunity to assess where R2P currently stands as an international norm.","PeriodicalId":505855,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Libya ve Suriye’de Koruma Sorumluluğu (R2P): Rakip Normatif Söylemlerin Analizi\",\"authors\":\"Marella BODUR ÜN, Tuğçe Kelleci̇\",\"doi\":\"10.58699/tyir.1353781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2011, based on the R2P principles, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) authorized a military intervention led by NATO in Libya to “protect civilians”. Yet, the UNSC could not agree on sanctions or military action to protect civilians in Syria. Analyzing the relevant UNSC resolutions, official documents, and formal statements of state representatives, this study aims to uncover the discursive practices around military interventions. More specifically, it explores official discourses that legitimized the NATO-led military intervention in Libya and non-intervention in Syria. A comparative analysis of the Libyan and Syrian cases presents us with an opportunity to assess where R2P currently stands as an international norm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58699/tyir.1353781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58699/tyir.1353781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2011 年,基于保护责任原则,联合国安理会授权北约对利比亚进行军事干预,以 "保护平民"。然而,联合国安理会未能就制裁或军事行动保护叙利亚平民达成一致。本研究分析了联合国安理会的相关决议、官方文件和国家代表的正式声明,旨在揭示围绕军事干预的话语实践。更具体地说,本研究探讨了使北约领导的对利比亚的军事干预和对叙利亚的不干预合法化的官方话语。通过对利比亚和叙利亚案例的比较分析,我们有机会评估保护责任目前作为国际准则的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Libya ve Suriye’de Koruma Sorumluluğu (R2P): Rakip Normatif Söylemlerin Analizi
In 2011, based on the R2P principles, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) authorized a military intervention led by NATO in Libya to “protect civilians”. Yet, the UNSC could not agree on sanctions or military action to protect civilians in Syria. Analyzing the relevant UNSC resolutions, official documents, and formal statements of state representatives, this study aims to uncover the discursive practices around military interventions. More specifically, it explores official discourses that legitimized the NATO-led military intervention in Libya and non-intervention in Syria. A comparative analysis of the Libyan and Syrian cases presents us with an opportunity to assess where R2P currently stands as an international norm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Yurt Dışındaki Vatandaşlarını Korumak için Kuvvet Kullanma: Rusya Federasyonu’nun Gürcistan ve Ukrayna’ya Müdahaleleri Discovering ‘Referent Object(s)’ and ‘Existential Threat(s)’ in the Public Speeches of the USA Presidents Bush and Obama (2001-2017): A Securitization Theory Perspective Türkiye's Northern Iraq Policy from the NeoclassIcal Realist Perspective (2002-2017) ASEAN’IN İNSAN HAKLARI PERSPEKTİFİNİN DÖNÜŞEN NİTELİĞİ: VİZYON VE UYGULAMA Libya ve Suriye’de Koruma Sorumluluğu (R2P): Rakip Normatif Söylemlerin Analizi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1