Luis Javier Cajas , María Carolina Torres , Mayelin Fernanda Ceballos
{"title":"通过结核菌素强化剂检测接受免疫抑制治疗患者的潜伏结核病","authors":"Luis Javier Cajas , María Carolina Torres , Mayelin Fernanda Ceballos","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreu.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><div>One-third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis. Because it can be reactivated by immunosuppressive treatments, screening is suggested. In Colombia, the tuberculin test with the booster is recommended in this population because of the risk of false negative results and anergy caused by treatments. Currently, the number of patients detected with this second test is unknown, so the primary objective is to determine the percentage of additional positive detections.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>From 2017 to 2022, a cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted on a group of patients from a rheumatology service who had a tuberculin test and a booster within a year to check for latent tuberculosis. Over the course of a year and three weeks, we looked at the number of patients whose booster tests showed new findings. A study was conducted to see if there were any differences in treatment based on the first tuberculin result.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A tuberculin test was performed on 674 subjects, of whom 496 were immunosuppressed. From the 382 whose test was negative, 191 and 74 booster tests were performed within a year and three weeks; 8 (4.1%) and 3 (3.6%) were positive, respectively. When evaluating the differences in treatments between the groups with a positive and negative first tuberculin test, significant differences were found. Use of prednisolone at 5<!--> <!-->mg or more per day (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.02) and three immunosuppressants (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.005) was more frequent in negative tuberculin tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>It can be said that the booster test raises the number of people with latent tuberculosis by 4%. More use of prednisolone at 5<!--> <!-->mg/day or three immunosuppressants in the group with the negative tuberculin test was found to be statistically significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37643,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of latent tuberculosis by tuberculin booster in patients with immunosuppressive treatment\",\"authors\":\"Luis Javier Cajas , María Carolina Torres , Mayelin Fernanda Ceballos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcreu.2023.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><div>One-third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis. Because it can be reactivated by immunosuppressive treatments, screening is suggested. In Colombia, the tuberculin test with the booster is recommended in this population because of the risk of false negative results and anergy caused by treatments. Currently, the number of patients detected with this second test is unknown, so the primary objective is to determine the percentage of additional positive detections.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>From 2017 to 2022, a cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted on a group of patients from a rheumatology service who had a tuberculin test and a booster within a year to check for latent tuberculosis. Over the course of a year and three weeks, we looked at the number of patients whose booster tests showed new findings. A study was conducted to see if there were any differences in treatment based on the first tuberculin result.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A tuberculin test was performed on 674 subjects, of whom 496 were immunosuppressed. From the 382 whose test was negative, 191 and 74 booster tests were performed within a year and three weeks; 8 (4.1%) and 3 (3.6%) were positive, respectively. When evaluating the differences in treatments between the groups with a positive and negative first tuberculin test, significant differences were found. Use of prednisolone at 5<!--> <!-->mg or more per day (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.02) and three immunosuppressants (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.005) was more frequent in negative tuberculin tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>It can be said that the booster test raises the number of people with latent tuberculosis by 4%. More use of prednisolone at 5<!--> <!-->mg/day or three immunosuppressants in the group with the negative tuberculin test was found to be statistically significant.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0121812323000956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0121812323000956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection of latent tuberculosis by tuberculin booster in patients with immunosuppressive treatment
Introduction and objective
One-third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis. Because it can be reactivated by immunosuppressive treatments, screening is suggested. In Colombia, the tuberculin test with the booster is recommended in this population because of the risk of false negative results and anergy caused by treatments. Currently, the number of patients detected with this second test is unknown, so the primary objective is to determine the percentage of additional positive detections.
Materials and methods
From 2017 to 2022, a cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted on a group of patients from a rheumatology service who had a tuberculin test and a booster within a year to check for latent tuberculosis. Over the course of a year and three weeks, we looked at the number of patients whose booster tests showed new findings. A study was conducted to see if there were any differences in treatment based on the first tuberculin result.
Results
A tuberculin test was performed on 674 subjects, of whom 496 were immunosuppressed. From the 382 whose test was negative, 191 and 74 booster tests were performed within a year and three weeks; 8 (4.1%) and 3 (3.6%) were positive, respectively. When evaluating the differences in treatments between the groups with a positive and negative first tuberculin test, significant differences were found. Use of prednisolone at 5 mg or more per day (p = .02) and three immunosuppressants (p = .005) was more frequent in negative tuberculin tests.
Conclusions
It can be said that the booster test raises the number of people with latent tuberculosis by 4%. More use of prednisolone at 5 mg/day or three immunosuppressants in the group with the negative tuberculin test was found to be statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
The Colombian Journal of Rheumatology (Revista Colombiana de Reumatología) is the official organ of the Colombian Association of Rheumatology (Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología) and the Central American, Caribbean and Andean Association of Rheumatology (Asociación Centroamericana Caribe Andina de Reumatología) - ACCA. It was created in December 1993 with the purpose of disseminating scientific information derived from primary and secondary research and presenting cases coming from the practice of Rheumatology in Latin America. Since its foundation, the Journal has been characterized by its plurality with subjects of all rheumatic and osteomuscular pathologies, in the form of original articles, historical articles, economic evaluations, and articles of reflection and education in Medicine. It covers an extensive area of topics ranging from the broad spectrum of the clinical aspects of rheumatology and related areas in autoimmunity (both in pediatric and adult pathologies), to aspects of basic sciences. It is an academic tool for the different members of the academic and scientific community at their different levels of training, from undergraduate to post-doctoral degrees, managing to integrate all actors inter and trans disciplinarily. It is intended for rheumatologists, general internists, specialists in related areas, and general practitioners in the country and abroad. It has become an important space in the work of all rheumatologists from Central and South America.