利用植物药防治影响撒哈拉以南非洲作物的病虫害:综述

Kutullo N. Shai , Mompati V. Chakale , Simeon A. Materechera , Stephen O. Amoo , Adeyemi O. Aremu
{"title":"利用植物药防治影响撒哈拉以南非洲作物的病虫害:综述","authors":"Kutullo N. Shai ,&nbsp;Mompati V. Chakale ,&nbsp;Simeon A. Materechera ,&nbsp;Stephen O. Amoo ,&nbsp;Adeyemi O. Aremu","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In sub-Saharan Africa, most food crop losses are caused by pests and diseases, prompting small-scale farmers to explore the use of botanicals as an environmentally friendly, accessible, and affordable alternative. This review presents a critical appraisal of current trends in the use of botanicals to manage crop pests and diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. A systematic search (covering January 2010 until June 2023) for eligible studies was done by exploring different databases, which yielded 13 eligible studies. An inventory of 177 plant species belonging to 54 families was recorded as botanicals used to control 28 pests and 15 crop diseases. <em>Azadirachta indica</em> A.Juss, <em>Allium cepa</em> L., and <em>Allium sativum</em> L. were the top-cited plants. The families with the highest reported plants were Fabaceae (27), Asteraceae (18), Solanaceae (14), and Euphorbiaceae (10). In terms of life form, the recorded plants were shrubs (40%), trees (38%), and herbs (22%). The plants were mainly used to manage pests and diseases affecting <em>Brassica oleracea</em> L., <em>Solanum lycopersicum</em> L., <em>Zea mays</em> L., <em>Spinacia oleracea</em> L., <em>Brassica oleracea</em> var. <em>sabellica</em>, and <em>Phaseolus vulgaris</em> L. A total of 14 plant parts were recorded, with the leaves (34%) and stem (15%) being the dominant parts used. In most cases, the preparation routes were unspecified (51%), which was followed by decoction (14%) and infusion (14%). The major method of administration was topical (55%), while approximately 39% of reports were unspecified. The pests consisted of vertebrates (28%) and invertebrates (72%) while the three (3) disease categories included fungal (77%), bacterial (17%), and viral (6%). The review revealed an ongoing dependence on the use of botanicals. However, extensive studies must be conducted that apply and adhere to good practice associated with ethnobotanical field surveys. This will aid in generating a comprehensive inventory of botanicals with potential for environmentally friendly pest and disease management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277307862300047X/pdfft?md5=eebf6efb9687cdae66134b8f08a4db50&pid=1-s2.0-S277307862300047X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilisation of botanicals for the management of pests and diseases affecting crops in sub-Saharan Africa: A review\",\"authors\":\"Kutullo N. Shai ,&nbsp;Mompati V. Chakale ,&nbsp;Simeon A. Materechera ,&nbsp;Stephen O. Amoo ,&nbsp;Adeyemi O. Aremu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In sub-Saharan Africa, most food crop losses are caused by pests and diseases, prompting small-scale farmers to explore the use of botanicals as an environmentally friendly, accessible, and affordable alternative. This review presents a critical appraisal of current trends in the use of botanicals to manage crop pests and diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. A systematic search (covering January 2010 until June 2023) for eligible studies was done by exploring different databases, which yielded 13 eligible studies. An inventory of 177 plant species belonging to 54 families was recorded as botanicals used to control 28 pests and 15 crop diseases. <em>Azadirachta indica</em> A.Juss, <em>Allium cepa</em> L., and <em>Allium sativum</em> L. were the top-cited plants. The families with the highest reported plants were Fabaceae (27), Asteraceae (18), Solanaceae (14), and Euphorbiaceae (10). In terms of life form, the recorded plants were shrubs (40%), trees (38%), and herbs (22%). The plants were mainly used to manage pests and diseases affecting <em>Brassica oleracea</em> L., <em>Solanum lycopersicum</em> L., <em>Zea mays</em> L., <em>Spinacia oleracea</em> L., <em>Brassica oleracea</em> var. <em>sabellica</em>, and <em>Phaseolus vulgaris</em> L. A total of 14 plant parts were recorded, with the leaves (34%) and stem (15%) being the dominant parts used. In most cases, the preparation routes were unspecified (51%), which was followed by decoction (14%) and infusion (14%). The major method of administration was topical (55%), while approximately 39% of reports were unspecified. The pests consisted of vertebrates (28%) and invertebrates (72%) while the three (3) disease categories included fungal (77%), bacterial (17%), and viral (6%). The review revealed an ongoing dependence on the use of botanicals. However, extensive studies must be conducted that apply and adhere to good practice associated with ethnobotanical field surveys. This will aid in generating a comprehensive inventory of botanicals with potential for environmentally friendly pest and disease management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277307862300047X/pdfft?md5=eebf6efb9687cdae66134b8f08a4db50&pid=1-s2.0-S277307862300047X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277307862300047X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277307862300047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,大多数粮食作物的损失都是由病虫害造成的,这促使小规模农户探索使用植物药作为一种环境友好型、易于获取且经济实惠的替代品。本综述对当前撒哈拉以南非洲地区使用植物药防治作物病虫害的趋势进行了批判性评估。通过探索不同的数据库,对符合条件的研究进行了系统检索(检索期为 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月),共检索到 13 项符合条件的研究。研究记录了隶属于 54 个科的 177 种植物,这些植物可用于控制 28 种害虫和 15 种作物疾病。Azadirachta indica A.Juss、Allium cepa L.和 Allium sativum L.是被引用最多的植物。报告植物最多的科是豆科(27 种)、菊科(18 种)、茄科(14 种)和大戟科(10 种)。就生命形式而言,记录的植物有灌木(40%)、乔木(38%)和草本植物(22%)。这些植物主要用于防治芸苔属、茄属、玉米属、菠菜属、芸苔属变种 sabellica 和普通相思豆属植物的病虫害。在大多数情况下,配制途径未作说明(51%),其次是煎煮(14%)和浸泡(14%)。主要给药方法是局部用药(55%),约 39% 的报告未说明给药方法。害虫包括脊椎动物(28%)和无脊椎动物(72%),而三(3)类疾病包括真菌(77%)、细菌(17%)和病毒(6%)。审查结果表明,植物药的使用一直存在依赖性。然而,必须开展广泛的研究,应用并遵守与人种植物学实地调查相关的良好做法。这将有助于编制一份具有环境友好型病虫害管理潜力的植物药综合清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilisation of botanicals for the management of pests and diseases affecting crops in sub-Saharan Africa: A review

In sub-Saharan Africa, most food crop losses are caused by pests and diseases, prompting small-scale farmers to explore the use of botanicals as an environmentally friendly, accessible, and affordable alternative. This review presents a critical appraisal of current trends in the use of botanicals to manage crop pests and diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. A systematic search (covering January 2010 until June 2023) for eligible studies was done by exploring different databases, which yielded 13 eligible studies. An inventory of 177 plant species belonging to 54 families was recorded as botanicals used to control 28 pests and 15 crop diseases. Azadirachta indica A.Juss, Allium cepa L., and Allium sativum L. were the top-cited plants. The families with the highest reported plants were Fabaceae (27), Asteraceae (18), Solanaceae (14), and Euphorbiaceae (10). In terms of life form, the recorded plants were shrubs (40%), trees (38%), and herbs (22%). The plants were mainly used to manage pests and diseases affecting Brassica oleracea L., Solanum lycopersicum L., Zea mays L., Spinacia oleracea L., Brassica oleracea var. sabellica, and Phaseolus vulgaris L. A total of 14 plant parts were recorded, with the leaves (34%) and stem (15%) being the dominant parts used. In most cases, the preparation routes were unspecified (51%), which was followed by decoction (14%) and infusion (14%). The major method of administration was topical (55%), while approximately 39% of reports were unspecified. The pests consisted of vertebrates (28%) and invertebrates (72%) while the three (3) disease categories included fungal (77%), bacterial (17%), and viral (6%). The review revealed an ongoing dependence on the use of botanicals. However, extensive studies must be conducted that apply and adhere to good practice associated with ethnobotanical field surveys. This will aid in generating a comprehensive inventory of botanicals with potential for environmentally friendly pest and disease management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploration of growth inhibitory and oviposition deterrent behaviour of Brassica juncea seed extracts against Bactrocera cucurbitae Extraction solvents and geographical origins of Piper retrofractum on the control efficiency of Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera frugiperda in laboratory and greenhouse conditions Exploring the potential of saponins from Dicotyledonous plants in sustainable pest management: Innovations and challenges: A review A comprehensive account of functional role of insect gut microbiome in insect orders A pesticide powder prepared from four Chinese herbal medicine extracts as the active ingredient: Optimization of preparation process and quality examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1