儿童攻击行为的反应性、主动性、关系性和缓慢消散性

Daniel A. Waschbusch PhD , Susan D. Mayes PhD , James G. Waxmonsky MD , Dara E. Babinski PhD , Raman Baweja MD, MS
{"title":"儿童攻击行为的反应性、主动性、关系性和缓慢消散性","authors":"Daniel A. Waschbusch PhD ,&nbsp;Susan D. Mayes PhD ,&nbsp;James G. Waxmonsky MD ,&nbsp;Dara E. Babinski PhD ,&nbsp;Raman Baweja MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated the associations between aggression subtypes (reactive, proactive, relational, and slow dissipation of aggression), callous-unemotional traits (CU), irritability (IRR), and sex among children.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The sample included 508 children 5 to 12 years of age, rated by their mothers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A 4-factor model of aggression subtypes (reactive, proactive, relational, slow dissipation) provided a good fit to the data. Correlations between aggression subtypes and demographic variables were generally nonsignificant, except for a unique association between relational aggression and sex, with girls exhibiting higher scores, and proactive aggression was associated with younger age. Both CU and IRR correlated positively with all types of aggression. Slow dissipation of aggression showed a unique association with IRR, whereas reactive aggression was uniquely associated with both CU and IRR. Regressions showed an interaction between CU, IRR, and sex for slow dissipation and relational aggression. Interactions showed that boys with high levels of both CU and IRR demonstrated slower dissipation of aggression, indicating a tendency to hold grudges, and that sex differences in relational aggression depended on the co-occurrence of CU and IRR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study sheds light on the interplay among aggression subtypes, CU, IRR, and sex in children. Findings emphasize the need for psychiatrists and other mental health professionals to consider the multifaceted nature of aggressive behavior and the role of CU and IRR when assessing aggressive children or developing treatment plans for them. Further research is warranted to examine these relationships longitudinally and across diverse populations.</p></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><p>In this study of 508 children between age 5 to 12, maternal ratings were used to distinguish 4 different types of aggression in their children: reactive (like hitting back when teased), proactive (starting fights), relational (spreading rumors), and slow to cool down (holding grudges). Girls were found to be more relational aggressors, and proactive aggression was more common in younger children. Results also showed that children with certain emotional traits (callous and irritable) were more likely to show all types of aggression, and boys who were both callous and irritable held onto their anger. All 4 types of aggression were associated with externalizing disorders: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical guidance</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Recognize the different types of aggression: Look beyond angry outbursts and consider reactive, proactive, relational, and slow dissipation of aggression to target intervention.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Emotional traits matter: Assess for callous-unemotional traits and irritability alongside aggression. High levels of both, especially in boys, may indicate greater difficulty managing anger and holding grudges.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Gender differences exist: Girls may be more prone to relational aggression compared to boys.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Proactive aggression might be more common in younger than in older children. Tailor interventions accordingly.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 90-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000698/pdfft?md5=e09491164564f200660bb2dd2c6451c6&pid=1-s2.0-S2949732923000698-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactive, Proactive, Relational, and Slow Dissipation of Aggression in Children\",\"authors\":\"Daniel A. Waschbusch PhD ,&nbsp;Susan D. Mayes PhD ,&nbsp;James G. Waxmonsky MD ,&nbsp;Dara E. Babinski PhD ,&nbsp;Raman Baweja MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated the associations between aggression subtypes (reactive, proactive, relational, and slow dissipation of aggression), callous-unemotional traits (CU), irritability (IRR), and sex among children.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The sample included 508 children 5 to 12 years of age, rated by their mothers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A 4-factor model of aggression subtypes (reactive, proactive, relational, slow dissipation) provided a good fit to the data. Correlations between aggression subtypes and demographic variables were generally nonsignificant, except for a unique association between relational aggression and sex, with girls exhibiting higher scores, and proactive aggression was associated with younger age. Both CU and IRR correlated positively with all types of aggression. Slow dissipation of aggression showed a unique association with IRR, whereas reactive aggression was uniquely associated with both CU and IRR. Regressions showed an interaction between CU, IRR, and sex for slow dissipation and relational aggression. Interactions showed that boys with high levels of both CU and IRR demonstrated slower dissipation of aggression, indicating a tendency to hold grudges, and that sex differences in relational aggression depended on the co-occurrence of CU and IRR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study sheds light on the interplay among aggression subtypes, CU, IRR, and sex in children. Findings emphasize the need for psychiatrists and other mental health professionals to consider the multifaceted nature of aggressive behavior and the role of CU and IRR when assessing aggressive children or developing treatment plans for them. Further research is warranted to examine these relationships longitudinally and across diverse populations.</p></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><p>In this study of 508 children between age 5 to 12, maternal ratings were used to distinguish 4 different types of aggression in their children: reactive (like hitting back when teased), proactive (starting fights), relational (spreading rumors), and slow to cool down (holding grudges). Girls were found to be more relational aggressors, and proactive aggression was more common in younger children. Results also showed that children with certain emotional traits (callous and irritable) were more likely to show all types of aggression, and boys who were both callous and irritable held onto their anger. All 4 types of aggression were associated with externalizing disorders: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical guidance</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Recognize the different types of aggression: Look beyond angry outbursts and consider reactive, proactive, relational, and slow dissipation of aggression to target intervention.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Emotional traits matter: Assess for callous-unemotional traits and irritability alongside aggression. High levels of both, especially in boys, may indicate greater difficulty managing anger and holding grudges.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Gender differences exist: Girls may be more prone to relational aggression compared to boys.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Proactive aggression might be more common in younger than in older children. Tailor interventions accordingly.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAACAP open\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 90-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000698/pdfft?md5=e09491164564f200660bb2dd2c6451c6&pid=1-s2.0-S2949732923000698-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAACAP open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结果 攻击亚型的 4 因子模型(反应型、主动型、关系型和缓慢消散型)与数据拟合良好。攻击行为亚型与人口统计学变量之间的相关性一般不显著,但关系型攻击行为与性别之间存在独特的关联,即女孩得分更高,而主动型攻击行为则与年龄较小有关。CU和IRR与所有攻击类型都呈正相关。缓慢消散的攻击行为与 IRR 有独特的关联,而反应性攻击行为与 CU 和 IRR 都有独特的关联。回归结果显示,CU、IRR 和性别之间对慢速消散和关系攻击存在交互作用。交互作用显示,CU 和 IRR 水平均较高的男孩的攻击性消散较慢,这表明他们有记仇的倾向,而关系攻击的性别差异取决于 CU 和 IRR 的共同出现。研究结果强调,精神科医生和其他心理健康专业人员在评估攻击性儿童或为其制定治疗计划时,需要考虑攻击行为的多面性以及 CU 和 IRR 的作用。在这项针对 508 名 5 至 12 岁儿童的研究中,母亲的评分被用来区分孩子的四种不同类型的攻击行为:反应性攻击行为(如被取笑时还手)、主动性攻击行为(挑起争斗)、关系性攻击行为(散布谣言)和迟缓性攻击行为(记仇)。结果发现,女孩更喜欢关系攻击,而主动攻击在年龄较小的儿童中更为常见。结果还显示,具有某些情绪特征(冷酷无情和易怒)的儿童更有可能表现出各种类型的攻击行为,而既冷酷无情又易怒的男孩则会将怒火憋在心里。所有四种类型的攻击行为都与外化障碍有关:注意力缺陷/多动障碍、对立违抗障碍和行为障碍:临床指导--认识不同类型的攻击行为:除了愤怒爆发外,还要考虑攻击行为的反应性、主动性、关系性和缓慢消散性,以便有针对性地进行干预:情绪特征很重要:在评估攻击行为的同时,也要评估冷酷无情的情绪特征和易怒性。两者的高水平,尤其是男孩,可能表明他们更难控制愤怒和记仇:女孩可能比男孩更容易产生关系攻击行为。相应地调整干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reactive, Proactive, Relational, and Slow Dissipation of Aggression in Children

Objective

This study investigated the associations between aggression subtypes (reactive, proactive, relational, and slow dissipation of aggression), callous-unemotional traits (CU), irritability (IRR), and sex among children.

Method

The sample included 508 children 5 to 12 years of age, rated by their mothers.

Results

A 4-factor model of aggression subtypes (reactive, proactive, relational, slow dissipation) provided a good fit to the data. Correlations between aggression subtypes and demographic variables were generally nonsignificant, except for a unique association between relational aggression and sex, with girls exhibiting higher scores, and proactive aggression was associated with younger age. Both CU and IRR correlated positively with all types of aggression. Slow dissipation of aggression showed a unique association with IRR, whereas reactive aggression was uniquely associated with both CU and IRR. Regressions showed an interaction between CU, IRR, and sex for slow dissipation and relational aggression. Interactions showed that boys with high levels of both CU and IRR demonstrated slower dissipation of aggression, indicating a tendency to hold grudges, and that sex differences in relational aggression depended on the co-occurrence of CU and IRR.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the interplay among aggression subtypes, CU, IRR, and sex in children. Findings emphasize the need for psychiatrists and other mental health professionals to consider the multifaceted nature of aggressive behavior and the role of CU and IRR when assessing aggressive children or developing treatment plans for them. Further research is warranted to examine these relationships longitudinally and across diverse populations.

Plain language summary

In this study of 508 children between age 5 to 12, maternal ratings were used to distinguish 4 different types of aggression in their children: reactive (like hitting back when teased), proactive (starting fights), relational (spreading rumors), and slow to cool down (holding grudges). Girls were found to be more relational aggressors, and proactive aggression was more common in younger children. Results also showed that children with certain emotional traits (callous and irritable) were more likely to show all types of aggression, and boys who were both callous and irritable held onto their anger. All 4 types of aggression were associated with externalizing disorders: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder.

Clinical guidance

  • Recognize the different types of aggression: Look beyond angry outbursts and consider reactive, proactive, relational, and slow dissipation of aggression to target intervention.

  • Emotional traits matter: Assess for callous-unemotional traits and irritability alongside aggression. High levels of both, especially in boys, may indicate greater difficulty managing anger and holding grudges.

  • Gender differences exist: Girls may be more prone to relational aggression compared to boys.

  • Proactive aggression might be more common in younger than in older children. Tailor interventions accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
期刊最新文献
Stimulant Medication Shortens the Duration of Impairing Emotional Outbursts Family Conflict, Perceived Criticism, and Aggression in Symptomatic Offspring of Parents With Mood Disorders: Results From a Clinical Trial of Family-Focused Therapy Aggressive Behavior in Children and Adolescents With Bipolar Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Treatment Using Machine Learning to Determine a Functional Classifier of Retaliation and Its Association With Aggression Review: Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Childhood Irritability and Aggressive Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1