Demos[公众]如何通过反复选举管理 Kratos[政府]:从土耳其大选中政府和反对党汲取的经验教训

Ahmet Keser, Burak Kılıç, Cuma Ali Özbek
{"title":"Demos[公众]如何通过反复选举管理 Kratos[政府]:从土耳其大选中政府和反对党汲取的经验教训","authors":"Ahmet Keser, Burak Kılıç, Cuma Ali Özbek","doi":"10.12658/m0704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objections to the results of conducted elections and repeated elections are a significant issue. The aim of this study is to investigate repeated elections and the reasons for canceling them through the decisions of Türkiye’s Supreme Election Council (SEC) since its establishment and to examine the results of repeated elections to reveal which side benefits from this. According to the results of the content analysis, the study found within the frame of the investigated period the SEC to have annulled a total of five elections, four of which had been local and one that had been a parliamentary election, and the most frequent reason for repeating the elections to have been due to restricted or ineligible voters voting, which occurred for four separate elections. Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.","PeriodicalId":507670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the Demos [Public] Regulate the Kratos [Administration] Through Repeated Elections: Lessons Learned from the Elections in Türkiye for the Government and Opposition\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Keser, Burak Kılıç, Cuma Ali Özbek\",\"doi\":\"10.12658/m0704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objections to the results of conducted elections and repeated elections are a significant issue. The aim of this study is to investigate repeated elections and the reasons for canceling them through the decisions of Türkiye’s Supreme Election Council (SEC) since its establishment and to examine the results of repeated elections to reveal which side benefits from this. According to the results of the content analysis, the study found within the frame of the investigated period the SEC to have annulled a total of five elections, four of which had been local and one that had been a parliamentary election, and the most frequent reason for repeating the elections to have been due to restricted or ineligible voters voting, which occurred for four separate elections. Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对已举行的选举和重复选举的结果提出异议是一个重要问题。本研究旨在通过土耳其最高选举委员会(SEC)自成立以来做出的决定,调查重复选举和取消选举的原因,并研究重复选举的结果,以揭示哪一方从中受益。根据内容分析的结果,研究发现,在调查期内,最高选举委员会共取消了五次选举,其中四次是地方选举,一次是议会选举,而重复选举最常见的原因是选民投票受到限制或不合格,这在四次选举中均有发生。政府和反对党可以从这些被取消和重复举行的选举中吸取教训,重复举行的选举通常会导致对参选政党不利的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How the Demos [Public] Regulate the Kratos [Administration] Through Repeated Elections: Lessons Learned from the Elections in Türkiye for the Government and Opposition
Objections to the results of conducted elections and repeated elections are a significant issue. The aim of this study is to investigate repeated elections and the reasons for canceling them through the decisions of Türkiye’s Supreme Election Council (SEC) since its establishment and to examine the results of repeated elections to reveal which side benefits from this. According to the results of the content analysis, the study found within the frame of the investigated period the SEC to have annulled a total of five elections, four of which had been local and one that had been a parliamentary election, and the most frequent reason for repeating the elections to have been due to restricted or ineligible voters voting, which occurred for four separate elections. Lessons exist for the government and opposition parties to learn from these annulled and repeated elections, with repeated elections generally resulting in an unfavorable outcome for the contesting party.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aydınlar ve İktidar: Erol Güngör’ün Orta Doğu Yazılarında Milliyetçi Cephe Koalisyonları Richard Hoggart, Okuryazarlığın Kullanımları: İşçi Sınıfı Yaşamının Veçheleri, Çeviri: Mümtaz Kirik, Levent Ünsaldı, Heretik Yayınları, 2022, 528 s. Çin’in Nükleer Stratejisinde Sapma: ABD Kaynaklı Tehdit Algıları ve Garantili Misilleme Arayışı Islamism, Death, and Justice: A Comparative History of Political Thought Daud Abdullah, Engaging the World: The Making of Hamas’s Foreign Policy, Afro-Middle East Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2021, 246 s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1