局部氧气疗法对伤口愈合影响的系统性综述

Khanjan Nagarsheth MD , Aman Kankaria BS , Justin Marsella BA , Eleanor Dunlap CRNP , Shannon Hawkins RN , Areck Ucuzian MD, PhD , Brajesh K. Lal MD
{"title":"局部氧气疗法对伤口愈合影响的系统性综述","authors":"Khanjan Nagarsheth MD ,&nbsp;Aman Kankaria BS ,&nbsp;Justin Marsella BA ,&nbsp;Eleanor Dunlap CRNP ,&nbsp;Shannon Hawkins RN ,&nbsp;Areck Ucuzian MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Lal MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2023.100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Various adjunct therapies are available for wound healing in addition to standard care. Topical oxygen therapy (TCOT) is one such novel therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of TCOT in the healing of cutaneous wounds of any etiology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The review was conducted on articles related to wounds treated with TCOT identified through PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. We included randomized controlled trials, double-arm prospective studies, single-arm prospective studies, case-control series, and case reports published on or after 2012. Only articles addressing TCOT were included; other forms of oxygen delivery were excluded. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of wounds completely healed, the percent decrease in wound area of those not completely healed, the recurrence of wounds after treatment, and effects on pain and ulcer rating scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 22 articles were included in this review. The results showed that TCOT has a significant salutary effect on complete wound healing in case-control studies (odds ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-9.77; <em>P</em> &lt; .001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 76.34%) and in single-arm studies (pooled prevalence, 0.48 [48.0%]; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62; <em>P</em> &lt; .001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 86.58). However, no significant effect was observed for percent wound reduction, the difference in ulcer grade scores, or the difference in pain scores. Most of the included studies had a high risk of bias because they were not blinded, were single-arm studies, or were case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings indicate that TCOT can have a positive effect on wound healing when compared with standard care. However, owing to the lack of randomized, controlled trials or studies with comparable end points, a definitive conclusion on the full impact of TCOT on wound healing cannot be reached. More high-quality data are needed to definitively determine the effects of TCOT on wound healing, preferably from a comprehensive, randomized controlled trial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272300048X/pdfft?md5=b3fca4fccf2e506dd55251a78222d519&pid=1-s2.0-S294991272300048X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of the effects of topical oxygen therapy on wound healing\",\"authors\":\"Khanjan Nagarsheth MD ,&nbsp;Aman Kankaria BS ,&nbsp;Justin Marsella BA ,&nbsp;Eleanor Dunlap CRNP ,&nbsp;Shannon Hawkins RN ,&nbsp;Areck Ucuzian MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Lal MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2023.100051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Various adjunct therapies are available for wound healing in addition to standard care. Topical oxygen therapy (TCOT) is one such novel therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of TCOT in the healing of cutaneous wounds of any etiology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The review was conducted on articles related to wounds treated with TCOT identified through PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. We included randomized controlled trials, double-arm prospective studies, single-arm prospective studies, case-control series, and case reports published on or after 2012. Only articles addressing TCOT were included; other forms of oxygen delivery were excluded. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of wounds completely healed, the percent decrease in wound area of those not completely healed, the recurrence of wounds after treatment, and effects on pain and ulcer rating scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 22 articles were included in this review. The results showed that TCOT has a significant salutary effect on complete wound healing in case-control studies (odds ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-9.77; <em>P</em> &lt; .001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 76.34%) and in single-arm studies (pooled prevalence, 0.48 [48.0%]; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62; <em>P</em> &lt; .001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 86.58). However, no significant effect was observed for percent wound reduction, the difference in ulcer grade scores, or the difference in pain scores. Most of the included studies had a high risk of bias because they were not blinded, were single-arm studies, or were case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings indicate that TCOT can have a positive effect on wound healing when compared with standard care. However, owing to the lack of randomized, controlled trials or studies with comparable end points, a definitive conclusion on the full impact of TCOT on wound healing cannot be reached. More high-quality data are needed to definitively determine the effects of TCOT on wound healing, preferably from a comprehensive, randomized controlled trial.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272300048X/pdfft?md5=b3fca4fccf2e506dd55251a78222d519&pid=1-s2.0-S294991272300048X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272300048X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272300048X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景除标准治疗外,还有多种辅助疗法可用于伤口愈合。局部氧疗(TCOT)就是这样一种新型疗法。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估 TCOT 在任何病因引起的皮肤伤口愈合中的作用。方法综述通过 PubMed、MEDLINE/OVID、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar 收录了与使用 TCOT 治疗伤口相关的文章。我们纳入了 2012 年或之后发表的随机对照试验、双臂前瞻性研究、单臂前瞻性研究、病例对照系列研究和病例报告。仅纳入了涉及 TCOT 的文章;其他形式的氧气输送均未纳入。我们的目标是评估伤口完全愈合的比例、未完全愈合伤口面积减少的百分比、治疗后伤口复发的情况以及对疼痛和溃疡评分量表的影响。结果表明,在病例对照研究(几率比为 4.48;95% 置信区间为 2.05-9.77;P < .001;I2 = 76.34%)和单臂研究(汇总患病率为 0.48 [48.0%];95% 置信区间为 0.34-0.62;P < .001;I2 = 86.58)中,TCOT 对伤口完全愈合有显著的促进作用。然而,在伤口缩小百分比、溃疡等级评分差异或疼痛评分差异方面未观察到明显效果。结论我们的研究结果表明,与标准护理相比,TCOT 可对伤口愈合产生积极影响。然而,由于缺乏随机对照试验或具有可比终点的研究,因此无法就 TCOT 对伤口愈合的全部影响得出明确结论。要明确确定 TCOT 对伤口愈合的影响,需要更多高质量的数据,最好是来自全面的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review of the effects of topical oxygen therapy on wound healing

Background

Various adjunct therapies are available for wound healing in addition to standard care. Topical oxygen therapy (TCOT) is one such novel therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of TCOT in the healing of cutaneous wounds of any etiology.

Methods

The review was conducted on articles related to wounds treated with TCOT identified through PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. We included randomized controlled trials, double-arm prospective studies, single-arm prospective studies, case-control series, and case reports published on or after 2012. Only articles addressing TCOT were included; other forms of oxygen delivery were excluded. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of wounds completely healed, the percent decrease in wound area of those not completely healed, the recurrence of wounds after treatment, and effects on pain and ulcer rating scales.

Results

A total of 22 articles were included in this review. The results showed that TCOT has a significant salutary effect on complete wound healing in case-control studies (odds ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-9.77; P < .001; I2 = 76.34%) and in single-arm studies (pooled prevalence, 0.48 [48.0%]; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62; P < .001; I2 = 86.58). However, no significant effect was observed for percent wound reduction, the difference in ulcer grade scores, or the difference in pain scores. Most of the included studies had a high risk of bias because they were not blinded, were single-arm studies, or were case reports.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that TCOT can have a positive effect on wound healing when compared with standard care. However, owing to the lack of randomized, controlled trials or studies with comparable end points, a definitive conclusion on the full impact of TCOT on wound healing cannot be reached. More high-quality data are needed to definitively determine the effects of TCOT on wound healing, preferably from a comprehensive, randomized controlled trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1