战略管理中的不可比性状况

Yassine Talaoui
{"title":"战略管理中的不可比性状况","authors":"Yassine Talaoui","doi":"10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of strategic management has witnessed a proliferation of theoretical perspectives following two main paradigms. The two camps roughly correspond, on the one hand, to the \"classical\" and \"neo-classical\" approaches, and on the other to the \"contingency\", \"post-classical\" and \"postmodern\" approaches. Underpinning these two camps are different conceptions of the theory of the firm and the purpose of theory itself in understanding business strategy, which are difficult and perhaps impossible to reconcile. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to expose the roots of this interminable argument over theory and proposes a way to escape this situation of incommensurability.","PeriodicalId":509643,"journal":{"name":"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Situation of Incommensurability in Strategic Management\",\"authors\":\"Yassine Talaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of strategic management has witnessed a proliferation of theoretical perspectives following two main paradigms. The two camps roughly correspond, on the one hand, to the \\\"classical\\\" and \\\"neo-classical\\\" approaches, and on the other to the \\\"contingency\\\", \\\"post-classical\\\" and \\\"postmodern\\\" approaches. Underpinning these two camps are different conceptions of the theory of the firm and the purpose of theory itself in understanding business strategy, which are difficult and perhaps impossible to reconcile. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to expose the roots of this interminable argument over theory and proposes a way to escape this situation of incommensurability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在战略管理领域,遵循两大范式的理论观点层出不穷。这两大阵营大致对应于 "古典 "和 "新古典 "方法,以及 "权变"、"后古典 "和 "后现代 "方法。支撑这两大阵营的是对企业理论和理论本身在理解企业战略方面的目的的不同概念,这两种概念很难调和,甚至不可能调和。在此背景下,本文试图揭示这种无休止的理论争论的根源,并提出摆脱这种不可通约局面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Situation of Incommensurability in Strategic Management
The field of strategic management has witnessed a proliferation of theoretical perspectives following two main paradigms. The two camps roughly correspond, on the one hand, to the "classical" and "neo-classical" approaches, and on the other to the "contingency", "post-classical" and "postmodern" approaches. Underpinning these two camps are different conceptions of the theory of the firm and the purpose of theory itself in understanding business strategy, which are difficult and perhaps impossible to reconcile. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to expose the roots of this interminable argument over theory and proposes a way to escape this situation of incommensurability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Green Transition and Industrial Ecosystems: the Impact of EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities The Enablers of CSR to Drive a Multifaceted Approach in Pakistan’s Oil and Gas Sectors : Modeling and Evaluating the Enablers of CSR ..... Value Analysis, Value Engineering and Value Management in Global Competition Reflection, Reflexivity and the Notion of Technology Suspension of Depreciation and Amortization vs. Government Financial Support for Businesses: An International Comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1