在普遍去势的情况下进行鼻腔耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养筛查

IF 0.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001328
Arunava Saha, Erin E O'SHEA PAUDEL
{"title":"在普遍去势的情况下进行鼻腔耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养筛查","authors":"Arunava Saha, Erin E O'SHEA PAUDEL","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screens has been compromised by universal decolonization practices. We aimed to determine the reliability of the nasal MRSA culture screen to deescalate antibiotic therapy in the setting of decolonization with ethyl alcohol. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using 62% ethanol solution intranasally per protocol. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received decolonization. Data were analyzed to determine NPV of the nasal MRSA culture screen with and without decolonization. A total of 505 cases were screened, and 128 subjects were included. One hundred two received decolonization, whereas 26 did not. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Overall MRSA infection prevalence was 31.25%. The NPV was 73% in the decolonized group compared with 80% in the group without. Positive predictive value was 63% in the group receiving decolonization compared with 100% in the group without. There was also a higher specificity but lower sensitivity of the nasal MRSA culture screen in the decolonization group. Nine patients in the decolonization group required reescalation of antibiotics compared with nil in the other group. Culture-based nasal MRSA screens are less accurate than PCR tests, as ethyl alcohol leads to false-negative results. A lower NPV in the decolonization group predisposes to increased false negative results, leading to inappropriate antibiotic deescalation and often requiring reinitiation. Nasal MRSA culture screen is less reliable if alcohol has already been administered for decolonization and cannot be used as an appropriate tool to guide antibiotic deescalation.","PeriodicalId":13952,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Culture Screens in the Setting of Universal Decolonization\",\"authors\":\"Arunava Saha, Erin E O'SHEA PAUDEL\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screens has been compromised by universal decolonization practices. We aimed to determine the reliability of the nasal MRSA culture screen to deescalate antibiotic therapy in the setting of decolonization with ethyl alcohol. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using 62% ethanol solution intranasally per protocol. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received decolonization. Data were analyzed to determine NPV of the nasal MRSA culture screen with and without decolonization. A total of 505 cases were screened, and 128 subjects were included. One hundred two received decolonization, whereas 26 did not. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Overall MRSA infection prevalence was 31.25%. The NPV was 73% in the decolonized group compared with 80% in the group without. Positive predictive value was 63% in the group receiving decolonization compared with 100% in the group without. There was also a higher specificity but lower sensitivity of the nasal MRSA culture screen in the decolonization group. Nine patients in the decolonization group required reescalation of antibiotics compared with nil in the other group. Culture-based nasal MRSA screens are less accurate than PCR tests, as ethyl alcohol leads to false-negative results. A lower NPV in the decolonization group predisposes to increased false negative results, leading to inappropriate antibiotic deescalation and often requiring reinitiation. Nasal MRSA culture screen is less reliable if alcohol has already been administered for decolonization and cannot be used as an appropriate tool to guide antibiotic deescalation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻腔耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查的阴性预测值(NPV)已被普遍的去菌实践所削弱。我们旨在确定鼻腔 MRSA 培养筛查的可靠性,以便在使用乙醇去菌的情况下降低抗生素治疗的等级。 我们按照方案使用 62% 的乙醇溶液进行鼻腔内治疗,开展了一项回顾性观察队列研究。根据患者是否接受去菌落治疗将其分为两组。对数据进行分析,以确定鼻腔 MRSA 培养筛查中是否进行了去菌处理的 NPV。 共筛查了 505 个病例,128 名受试者被纳入其中。其中 122 人接受了去菌落治疗,26 人未接受治疗。基线特征非常均衡。总体 MRSA 感染率为 31.25%。去菌落组的 NPV 为 73%,而未去菌落组的 NPV 为 80%。接受去菌落治疗组的阳性预测值为 63%,而未接受去菌落治疗组的阳性预测值为 100%。此外,去菌落组鼻腔 MRSA 培养筛查的特异性较高,但敏感性较低。去殖民化组有九名患者需要重新使用抗生素,而另一组则为零。 鼻腔 MRSA 培养筛查不如 PCR 检测准确,因为乙醇会导致假阴性结果。去殖民化组的 NPV 较低,容易导致假阴性结果增加,从而导致不适当的抗生素降级,而且往往需要重新使用抗生素。如果已使用酒精进行去菌落,则鼻腔 MRSA 培养筛查的可靠性较低,不能作为指导抗生素降级的适当工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Culture Screens in the Setting of Universal Decolonization
The negative predictive value (NPV) of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screens has been compromised by universal decolonization practices. We aimed to determine the reliability of the nasal MRSA culture screen to deescalate antibiotic therapy in the setting of decolonization with ethyl alcohol. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using 62% ethanol solution intranasally per protocol. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received decolonization. Data were analyzed to determine NPV of the nasal MRSA culture screen with and without decolonization. A total of 505 cases were screened, and 128 subjects were included. One hundred two received decolonization, whereas 26 did not. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Overall MRSA infection prevalence was 31.25%. The NPV was 73% in the decolonized group compared with 80% in the group without. Positive predictive value was 63% in the group receiving decolonization compared with 100% in the group without. There was also a higher specificity but lower sensitivity of the nasal MRSA culture screen in the decolonization group. Nine patients in the decolonization group required reescalation of antibiotics compared with nil in the other group. Culture-based nasal MRSA screens are less accurate than PCR tests, as ethyl alcohol leads to false-negative results. A lower NPV in the decolonization group predisposes to increased false negative results, leading to inappropriate antibiotic deescalation and often requiring reinitiation. Nasal MRSA culture screen is less reliable if alcohol has already been administered for decolonization and cannot be used as an appropriate tool to guide antibiotic deescalation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Medical professionals seeking an infectious diseases journal with true clinical value need look no further than Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. Here, clinicians can get full coverage consolidated into one resource, with pertinent new developments presented in a way that makes them easy to apply to patient care. From HIV care delivery to Hepatitis C virus testing…travel and tropical medicine…and infection surveillance, prevention, and control, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice delivers the vital information needed to optimally prevent and treat infectious diseases. Indexed/abstracted in: EMBASE, SCOPUS, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine
期刊最新文献
The Etiologic Organisms, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients Evaluation of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Women With Acute Cystitis Visiting Outpatient Clinic in South Korea Mucormycosis in Diabetes Determinants of Mortality in COVID-19–Associated Opportunistic Fungal Infections Ceftaroline Fosamil as a Potential Treatment for Central Nervous System Infections in Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1