遗忘多年的导丝是否应该取出?血液透析导管导丝留在体内的不良并发症

M. Hekmat, H. Ghaderi, Zahra Ansari Aval, S. Mirjafari, R. Tirdad
{"title":"遗忘多年的导丝是否应该取出?血液透析导管导丝留在体内的不良并发症","authors":"M. Hekmat, H. Ghaderi, Zahra Ansari Aval, S. Mirjafari, R. Tirdad","doi":"10.34172/npj.2023.11649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, one of the most common methods used in the emergency room or intensive care unit (ICU) in patients is the Seldinger technique to access the central venous system, shunting for hemodialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, or arterial insertion. Accidental leaving of the guide wire is an uncommon but important complication that can occur as a result of an incorrect technique, and it is sometimes found accidentally or due to complications years after the procedure. The case is a 53-year-old patient who underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve and mitral valve repair with a ring 12 years ago and was treated with warfarin. Two years after the heart surgery, due to chronic renal failure, the patient underwent dialysis, and after the preparation of an arteriovenous fistula, he underwent stenting. After approximately ten years, the patient developed fever, chills, and shortness of breath. During the examination, endocarditis was diagnosed, and a part of the aortic valve was released. There was a severe paravalvular leak in the aortic valve, and an abscess was formed in the aorta root. We also noticed a forgotten guide wire in the superior vena cava, right atrium, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein, and echogenic masses were located on the guidewire. The diagnosis was confirmed by echocardiography, chest x-ray, and phenocopy. After antibiotic therapy, the patients underwent heart surgery, aortic valve replacement, and aortic root repair, and the guidewire was removed (70 cm long). Unfortunately, despite all measures, the patient died a few days after the surgery. Due to complications, a forgotten guidewire should be removed immediately after diagnosis. The preferred intervention is the removal of the guidewire by endovascular interventions, but surgical treatment should also be considered in some cases.","PeriodicalId":16388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephropharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should a forgotten guidewire be removed after years? An undesirable complication of hemodialysis catheter wire left in the body\",\"authors\":\"M. Hekmat, H. Ghaderi, Zahra Ansari Aval, S. Mirjafari, R. Tirdad\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/npj.2023.11649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, one of the most common methods used in the emergency room or intensive care unit (ICU) in patients is the Seldinger technique to access the central venous system, shunting for hemodialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, or arterial insertion. Accidental leaving of the guide wire is an uncommon but important complication that can occur as a result of an incorrect technique, and it is sometimes found accidentally or due to complications years after the procedure. The case is a 53-year-old patient who underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve and mitral valve repair with a ring 12 years ago and was treated with warfarin. Two years after the heart surgery, due to chronic renal failure, the patient underwent dialysis, and after the preparation of an arteriovenous fistula, he underwent stenting. After approximately ten years, the patient developed fever, chills, and shortness of breath. During the examination, endocarditis was diagnosed, and a part of the aortic valve was released. There was a severe paravalvular leak in the aortic valve, and an abscess was formed in the aorta root. We also noticed a forgotten guide wire in the superior vena cava, right atrium, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein, and echogenic masses were located on the guidewire. The diagnosis was confirmed by echocardiography, chest x-ray, and phenocopy. After antibiotic therapy, the patients underwent heart surgery, aortic valve replacement, and aortic root repair, and the guidewire was removed (70 cm long). Unfortunately, despite all measures, the patient died a few days after the surgery. Due to complications, a forgotten guidewire should be removed immediately after diagnosis. The preferred intervention is the removal of the guidewire by endovascular interventions, but surgical treatment should also be considered in some cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephropharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/npj.2023.11649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/npj.2023.11649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,急诊室或重症监护室(ICU)患者最常用的方法之一是通过塞尔丁格技术进入中心静脉系统、进行血液透析分流、主动脉内球囊泵或动脉插入。导丝意外脱落是一种不常见但却很重要的并发症,可能是由于不正确的技术造成的,有时会在术后数年意外发现或由于并发症造成。该病例是一名 53 岁的患者,12 年前接受了主动脉瓣置换术(机械瓣)和二尖瓣修补术(环),并接受了华法林治疗。心脏手术两年后,由于慢性肾功能衰竭,患者接受了透析,并在准备动静脉瘘后接受了支架植入术。大约十年后,患者出现发热、寒战和气短。在检查中,他被诊断为心内膜炎,主动脉瓣的一部分被释放。主动脉瓣有严重的瓣旁漏,主动脉根部形成脓肿。我们还发现上腔静脉、右心房、下腔静脉和肝静脉内有一根被遗忘的导丝,导丝上有回声包块。经超声心动图、胸部 X 光检查和病理解剖确诊。经过抗生素治疗后,患者接受了心脏手术、主动脉瓣置换术和主动脉根部修补术,并取出了导丝(70 厘米长)。不幸的是,尽管采取了所有措施,患者还是在术后几天死亡。由于存在并发症,在确诊后应立即拔除遗忘的导丝。首选的干预方法是通过血管内介入取出导丝,但在某些情况下也应考虑手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should a forgotten guidewire be removed after years? An undesirable complication of hemodialysis catheter wire left in the body
Today, one of the most common methods used in the emergency room or intensive care unit (ICU) in patients is the Seldinger technique to access the central venous system, shunting for hemodialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, or arterial insertion. Accidental leaving of the guide wire is an uncommon but important complication that can occur as a result of an incorrect technique, and it is sometimes found accidentally or due to complications years after the procedure. The case is a 53-year-old patient who underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve and mitral valve repair with a ring 12 years ago and was treated with warfarin. Two years after the heart surgery, due to chronic renal failure, the patient underwent dialysis, and after the preparation of an arteriovenous fistula, he underwent stenting. After approximately ten years, the patient developed fever, chills, and shortness of breath. During the examination, endocarditis was diagnosed, and a part of the aortic valve was released. There was a severe paravalvular leak in the aortic valve, and an abscess was formed in the aorta root. We also noticed a forgotten guide wire in the superior vena cava, right atrium, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein, and echogenic masses were located on the guidewire. The diagnosis was confirmed by echocardiography, chest x-ray, and phenocopy. After antibiotic therapy, the patients underwent heart surgery, aortic valve replacement, and aortic root repair, and the guidewire was removed (70 cm long). Unfortunately, despite all measures, the patient died a few days after the surgery. Due to complications, a forgotten guidewire should be removed immediately after diagnosis. The preferred intervention is the removal of the guidewire by endovascular interventions, but surgical treatment should also be considered in some cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephropharmacology
Journal of Nephropharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effect of montelukast drug in improving the clinical condition of patients with COVID-19 in referral hospitals in Isfahan; a randomized clinical trial Renal insufficiency in breast cancer patients; a review study The Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy; a promising step toward better treating the disease Emerging cancer in individuals with cardiovascular disease: Exploring the intersection of reverse cardio-oncology and nephropharmacology Oncocardiology: close collaboration between oncologists, cardiologists, and nephrologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1