超越各部分的总和

Elisa Bone, Eduardo Oliveira, Rachel Colla, Sarah Yang Spencer, Jen Farrow, Julian Harris, Luis Gaitan, Naima Iftikhar
{"title":"超越各部分的总和","authors":"Elisa Bone, Eduardo Oliveira, Rachel Colla, Sarah Yang Spencer, Jen Farrow, Julian Harris, Luis Gaitan, Naima Iftikhar","doi":"10.14742/apubs.2023.476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Curriculum renewal in higher education is a complex process involving multiple stakeholders across faculties, departments and supporting units with priorities and processes that commonly differ, adding to the complexity. Incentives for instructors to modify their curriculum include funded centralised programs that may also draw on the expertise of academic developers, learning designers and media producers. Here we reflect on our recent experiences working together across disparate academic and professional teams within a centrally funded curriculum renewal and innovation program in a large research-intensive university. One year after the implementation of a formalised network of supporting academic fellows, program reach significantly improved, and several projects implemented award-winning innovations. Early reflections on experiences across our supporting teams suggest that collaborative project work has contributed to more effective and innovative curriculum change initiatives. We propose a deeper investigation of these processes in a research project, to further inform curriculum innovation at research-intensive universities.","PeriodicalId":236417,"journal":{"name":"ASCILITE Publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More than the sum of its parts\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Bone, Eduardo Oliveira, Rachel Colla, Sarah Yang Spencer, Jen Farrow, Julian Harris, Luis Gaitan, Naima Iftikhar\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/apubs.2023.476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Curriculum renewal in higher education is a complex process involving multiple stakeholders across faculties, departments and supporting units with priorities and processes that commonly differ, adding to the complexity. Incentives for instructors to modify their curriculum include funded centralised programs that may also draw on the expertise of academic developers, learning designers and media producers. Here we reflect on our recent experiences working together across disparate academic and professional teams within a centrally funded curriculum renewal and innovation program in a large research-intensive university. One year after the implementation of a formalised network of supporting academic fellows, program reach significantly improved, and several projects implemented award-winning innovations. Early reflections on experiences across our supporting teams suggest that collaborative project work has contributed to more effective and innovative curriculum change initiatives. We propose a deeper investigation of these processes in a research project, to further inform curriculum innovation at research-intensive universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASCILITE Publications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASCILITE Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCILITE Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育的课程更新是一个复杂的过程,涉及院系和支持单位的多个利益相关者,其优先事项和过程通常各不相同,从而增加了复杂性。激励教师修改课程的措施包括资助中央项目,这些项目也可能利用学术开发人员、学习设计人员和媒体制作人员的专业知识。在此,我们回顾了我们最近在一所大型研究密集型大学的中央资助课程更新和创新项目中,与不同的学术和专业团队合作的经历。在实施了正式的学术研究人员支持网络一年后,项目的覆盖范围显著扩大,多个项目实施了获奖创新。对支持团队经验的早期反思表明,合作项目工作有助于提高课程改革举措的效率和创新性。我们建议在一个研究项目中对这些过程进行更深入的调查,以便为研究密集型大学的课程创新提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More than the sum of its parts
Curriculum renewal in higher education is a complex process involving multiple stakeholders across faculties, departments and supporting units with priorities and processes that commonly differ, adding to the complexity. Incentives for instructors to modify their curriculum include funded centralised programs that may also draw on the expertise of academic developers, learning designers and media producers. Here we reflect on our recent experiences working together across disparate academic and professional teams within a centrally funded curriculum renewal and innovation program in a large research-intensive university. One year after the implementation of a formalised network of supporting academic fellows, program reach significantly improved, and several projects implemented award-winning innovations. Early reflections on experiences across our supporting teams suggest that collaborative project work has contributed to more effective and innovative curriculum change initiatives. We propose a deeper investigation of these processes in a research project, to further inform curriculum innovation at research-intensive universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Governance of artificial intelligence and data in Australasian higher education: A snapshot of policy and practice Learning design principles that cultivate future-oriented students It’s the vibe – Course environment and the intersection of environmental psychology and learner experience design Adapting assessment for/despite generative artificial intelligence Learning analytics with iLearn Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1