发展中国家的新公共管理言论:机构化和管理控制会导致组织文化转型吗?

Q1 Social Sciences Administratie si Management Public Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.24818/amp/2023.41-04
Abdul Halil Hi Ibrahim, Evi Satispi, A. Andriansyah, Katarzyna SZCZEPAŃSKA-WOSZCZYNA, Sebastian Kot
{"title":"发展中国家的新公共管理言论:机构化和管理控制会导致组织文化转型吗?","authors":"Abdul Halil Hi Ibrahim, Evi Satispi, A. Andriansyah, Katarzyna SZCZEPAŃSKA-WOSZCZYNA, Sebastian Kot","doi":"10.24818/amp/2023.41-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agencification and granting managerial autonomy to public sector organisations are believed to change organisational cultures. This study used path and factor analysis on a sample of 600 public sector personnel in Indonesia to evaluate the role of agencification in the New Public Management (NPM) framework. The study revealed that agencification regarding personnel and financial management autonomy promotes a result-oriented culture while encouraging improved public organisation performance. However, it contradicted traditional NPM concepts by proving that more than management control alone is needed to promote a results-oriented culture among public sector personnel naturally. These findings show that its discourse and application must be modified to realise NPM's promise in the Indonesian setting fully. Future research should investigate the impact of external influences on agency formation and managerial control and ways for cultivating a results-oriented culture in public sector organisations. The study's limitations, such as its concentration on Indonesia and its temporal scope, necessitate comparative analysis across areas and longitudinal studies better to understand the dynamics of agencification and management control. The study's conclusions have ramifications for public sector reform in Indonesia and other nations. Governments must know the intricate interplay between autonomy,management control, and a results-oriented culture. They should also examine the importance of a pragmatic and context-aware approach to NPM.","PeriodicalId":38266,"journal":{"name":"Administratie si Management Public","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Public Management rhetoric in developing country: will agencification and management control lead to organisational culture transformation?\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Halil Hi Ibrahim, Evi Satispi, A. Andriansyah, Katarzyna SZCZEPAŃSKA-WOSZCZYNA, Sebastian Kot\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/amp/2023.41-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agencification and granting managerial autonomy to public sector organisations are believed to change organisational cultures. This study used path and factor analysis on a sample of 600 public sector personnel in Indonesia to evaluate the role of agencification in the New Public Management (NPM) framework. The study revealed that agencification regarding personnel and financial management autonomy promotes a result-oriented culture while encouraging improved public organisation performance. However, it contradicted traditional NPM concepts by proving that more than management control alone is needed to promote a results-oriented culture among public sector personnel naturally. These findings show that its discourse and application must be modified to realise NPM's promise in the Indonesian setting fully. Future research should investigate the impact of external influences on agency formation and managerial control and ways for cultivating a results-oriented culture in public sector organisations. The study's limitations, such as its concentration on Indonesia and its temporal scope, necessitate comparative analysis across areas and longitudinal studies better to understand the dynamics of agencification and management control. The study's conclusions have ramifications for public sector reform in Indonesia and other nations. Governments must know the intricate interplay between autonomy,management control, and a results-oriented culture. They should also examine the importance of a pragmatic and context-aware approach to NPM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administratie si Management Public\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administratie si Management Public\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.41-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administratie si Management Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2023.41-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机构化和赋予公共部门组织管理自主权被认为会改变组织文化。本研究对印度尼西亚 600 名公共部门人员样本进行了路径和因素分析,以评估新公共管理(NPM)框架中机构化的作用。研究显示,人事和财务管理自主权方面的机构化促进了以结果为导向的文化,同时鼓励提高公共组织的绩效。然而,它与传统的新公共管理概念相矛盾,证明要在公共部门人员中自然而然地推广注重成果的文化,需要的不仅仅是管理控制。这些研究结果表明,要在印尼环境中充分实现新式公共管理的承诺,必须对其论述和应用进行修改。未来的研究应探讨外部影响因素对机构形成和管理控制的影响,以及在公共部门组织中培养成果导向文化的方法。本研究的局限性,如研究集中于印度尼西亚和研究的时间范围,需要进行跨地区的比较分析和纵向研究,以更好地了解机构形成和管理控制的动态。本研究的结论对印尼和其他国家的公共部门改革具有影响。各国政府必须了解自治、管理控制和以结果为导向的文化之间错综复杂的相互作用。他们还应该研究对国家预防机制采取务实和了解具体情况的方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Public Management rhetoric in developing country: will agencification and management control lead to organisational culture transformation?
Agencification and granting managerial autonomy to public sector organisations are believed to change organisational cultures. This study used path and factor analysis on a sample of 600 public sector personnel in Indonesia to evaluate the role of agencification in the New Public Management (NPM) framework. The study revealed that agencification regarding personnel and financial management autonomy promotes a result-oriented culture while encouraging improved public organisation performance. However, it contradicted traditional NPM concepts by proving that more than management control alone is needed to promote a results-oriented culture among public sector personnel naturally. These findings show that its discourse and application must be modified to realise NPM's promise in the Indonesian setting fully. Future research should investigate the impact of external influences on agency formation and managerial control and ways for cultivating a results-oriented culture in public sector organisations. The study's limitations, such as its concentration on Indonesia and its temporal scope, necessitate comparative analysis across areas and longitudinal studies better to understand the dynamics of agencification and management control. The study's conclusions have ramifications for public sector reform in Indonesia and other nations. Governments must know the intricate interplay between autonomy,management control, and a results-oriented culture. They should also examine the importance of a pragmatic and context-aware approach to NPM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Administratie si Management Public
Administratie si Management Public Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Is an international academic journal, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Administration and Public Management and the International Centre for Public Management. Is an open access journal published in English, twice a year. Is double peer-reviewed. Includes articles prepared by scholars, researchers and practitioners. Is addressed to the teachers, researchers, Ph. D students, master students, undergraduate students, public managers, civil servants and to other categories of readers. The papers published in this journal: - Contain the research results of some researches and surveys developed by the authors. - Include new theoretical/practical and original approaches that were presented and analysed by the authors. - Offer solutions for the public managers problems. - Stimulate the know-how transfer from an institution to another, from a country to another in the areas of administration and public management. The paper proposed for evaluation can be sent throughout the year, preferably by the end of April or before the end of October. Main areas covered by the journal articles are: public management; public administration; public policy; public services; social economy; social environment; management of the nongovernmental organizations; human resources management in the public sector; decision making in public organizations; governance; communication in public sector; sociology; demografy; migration; globalization; other related domains.
期刊最新文献
Government assistance programs for internally displaced persons: assessing the impact on economic growth and labour market Greening public organisations: is there room for pro-environmental public servants to participate? Decision support in the budget management of a public institution: a constructivist multicriteria model Differences of motivation profile of public sector employees in Israel depending on age and job seniority New Public Management rhetoric in developing country: will agencification and management control lead to organisational culture transformation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1