MOOC 中的问题剂量

Sadia Nawaz, Katherine Mayle, Grace Martens, Rebecca Stein, R. S. Baker
{"title":"MOOC 中的问题剂量","authors":"Sadia Nawaz, Katherine Mayle, Grace Martens, Rebecca Stein, R. S. Baker","doi":"10.14742/apubs.2023.508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Video lectures in online courses often use pop-up questions or quizzes to enhance learners’ engagement and their learning outcomes. However, there is limited research about how frequently pop-up questions should be asked, considering how this design decision may impact learners’ self-regulation and motivation to learn, as well as their perceptions of confidence and challenge associated with the learning content. This study aims to answer the above questions while considering learners’ final learning outcomes in a massive open online course (MOOC). In this study, learners were divided into high and low frequency groups. The high frequency group were given a question almost every 2 minutes whereas the low frequency group were given a question only once at the end of the video. No significant differences on any of the above factors were found between the two groups. Educators may take these results into account when designing MOOCs in the future. MOOCs are costly and time-consuming to create, and this experiment suggests that using resources on this level of detail may not be necessary.","PeriodicalId":236417,"journal":{"name":"ASCILITE Publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Question Dosage in MOOCs\",\"authors\":\"Sadia Nawaz, Katherine Mayle, Grace Martens, Rebecca Stein, R. S. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/apubs.2023.508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Video lectures in online courses often use pop-up questions or quizzes to enhance learners’ engagement and their learning outcomes. However, there is limited research about how frequently pop-up questions should be asked, considering how this design decision may impact learners’ self-regulation and motivation to learn, as well as their perceptions of confidence and challenge associated with the learning content. This study aims to answer the above questions while considering learners’ final learning outcomes in a massive open online course (MOOC). In this study, learners were divided into high and low frequency groups. The high frequency group were given a question almost every 2 minutes whereas the low frequency group were given a question only once at the end of the video. No significant differences on any of the above factors were found between the two groups. Educators may take these results into account when designing MOOCs in the future. MOOCs are costly and time-consuming to create, and this experiment suggests that using resources on this level of detail may not be necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASCILITE Publications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASCILITE Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCILITE Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线课程中的视频讲座经常使用弹出式问题或测验来提高学习者的参与度和学习效果。然而,关于弹出式问题的频率,考虑到这一设计决定可能会如何影响学习者的自我调节和学习动机,以及他们对学习内容的信心和挑战的看法,目前的研究还很有限。本研究旨在回答上述问题,同时考虑学习者在大规模开放式在线课程(MOOC)中的最终学习成果。在本研究中,学习者被分为高频组和低频组。高频组几乎每两分钟就会被问到一个问题,而低频组只在视频结束时被问到一次问题。结果发现,两组学生在上述因素方面均无明显差异。教育工作者今后在设计 MOOC 时可以考虑这些结果。MOOC 的制作成本高、耗时长,而本实验表明,将资源用在如此详细的层面上可能并无必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Question Dosage in MOOCs
Video lectures in online courses often use pop-up questions or quizzes to enhance learners’ engagement and their learning outcomes. However, there is limited research about how frequently pop-up questions should be asked, considering how this design decision may impact learners’ self-regulation and motivation to learn, as well as their perceptions of confidence and challenge associated with the learning content. This study aims to answer the above questions while considering learners’ final learning outcomes in a massive open online course (MOOC). In this study, learners were divided into high and low frequency groups. The high frequency group were given a question almost every 2 minutes whereas the low frequency group were given a question only once at the end of the video. No significant differences on any of the above factors were found between the two groups. Educators may take these results into account when designing MOOCs in the future. MOOCs are costly and time-consuming to create, and this experiment suggests that using resources on this level of detail may not be necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Governance of artificial intelligence and data in Australasian higher education: A snapshot of policy and practice Learning design principles that cultivate future-oriented students It’s the vibe – Course environment and the intersection of environmental psychology and learner experience design Adapting assessment for/despite generative artificial intelligence Learning analytics with iLearn Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1