A. V. Vasilchenko, S. N. Skridlevskiy, A. Likutov, E. Merkulova
{"title":"导航系统在结肠镜检查中的应用","authors":"A. V. Vasilchenko, S. N. Skridlevskiy, A. Likutov, E. Merkulova","doi":"10.21518/akh2023-026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. There are opinions that the use of modern high-tech additional techniques, including a navigation system for positioning a colonoscope (MEI), can both increase the diagnostic efficiency of colonoscopy and its comfort for the patient, and do not affect the quality of colonoscopy. Aim. To determine the capabilities of MEI during colonoscopy without sedation. Materials and methods. The single-center, prospective, randomized study included 120 patients (from 20 to 82 years, mean age 51.8 years; 53% men / 47% women) who underwent routine diagnostic outpatient colonoscopy using a rotational technique by experienced endoscopists using MEI navigation system. The study took place in two stages: Stage 1 – randomization and assessment of group comparability (group 1 – MEI, n = 57 and group 2 – without MEI, n = 63); Stage 2 – determination of the number of patients with colon preparation for colonoscopy according to the Boston scale > 6 points (n = 112: 1st study-MEI group, n = 52 and 2nd control group, n = 60); comparative analysis between groups of the frequency of cecal intubation, time of cecal intubation, pain assessment on the VAS scale in cm. Statistical analysis was carried out using Fisher’s exact test, two-sided Mann-Whitney rank sum U test at a significance level of 0.05. Results and discussion. The groups were comparable in age, gender, preliminary indications for the study. The cecum was intubated significantly more often in group 1 (100% vs 90%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time required for cecal intubation (p = 0.258) and the difference in the mean time required for cecal intubation was 22 seconds. The VAS pain assessment also did not reveal significant differences (p = 1.023). We determined that the increase in the frequency of cecal intubation using MEI by experienced endoscopists increases by 10% and reaches 100%, while the opinion about reducing the time of cecal intubation and improving patient comfort were not confirmed. Conclusion. MEI during rotational colonoscopy performed by experienced endoscopists increases the likelihood of cecal intubation during routine colonoscopy by 10%. MEI does not increase the time required for cecal intubation and is not associated with the frequency or intensity of pain or discomfort on the VAS scale in colonoscopy without sedation.","PeriodicalId":398195,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of navigation system in colonoscopy\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Vasilchenko, S. N. Skridlevskiy, A. Likutov, E. Merkulova\",\"doi\":\"10.21518/akh2023-026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. There are opinions that the use of modern high-tech additional techniques, including a navigation system for positioning a colonoscope (MEI), can both increase the diagnostic efficiency of colonoscopy and its comfort for the patient, and do not affect the quality of colonoscopy. Aim. To determine the capabilities of MEI during colonoscopy without sedation. Materials and methods. The single-center, prospective, randomized study included 120 patients (from 20 to 82 years, mean age 51.8 years; 53% men / 47% women) who underwent routine diagnostic outpatient colonoscopy using a rotational technique by experienced endoscopists using MEI navigation system. The study took place in two stages: Stage 1 – randomization and assessment of group comparability (group 1 – MEI, n = 57 and group 2 – without MEI, n = 63); Stage 2 – determination of the number of patients with colon preparation for colonoscopy according to the Boston scale > 6 points (n = 112: 1st study-MEI group, n = 52 and 2nd control group, n = 60); comparative analysis between groups of the frequency of cecal intubation, time of cecal intubation, pain assessment on the VAS scale in cm. Statistical analysis was carried out using Fisher’s exact test, two-sided Mann-Whitney rank sum U test at a significance level of 0.05. Results and discussion. The groups were comparable in age, gender, preliminary indications for the study. The cecum was intubated significantly more often in group 1 (100% vs 90%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time required for cecal intubation (p = 0.258) and the difference in the mean time required for cecal intubation was 22 seconds. The VAS pain assessment also did not reveal significant differences (p = 1.023). We determined that the increase in the frequency of cecal intubation using MEI by experienced endoscopists increases by 10% and reaches 100%, while the opinion about reducing the time of cecal intubation and improving patient comfort were not confirmed. Conclusion. MEI during rotational colonoscopy performed by experienced endoscopists increases the likelihood of cecal intubation during routine colonoscopy by 10%. MEI does not increase the time required for cecal intubation and is not associated with the frequency or intensity of pain or discomfort on the VAS scale in colonoscopy without sedation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2023-026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2023-026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言。有观点认为,使用现代高科技附加技术,包括结肠镜定位导航系统(MEI),既能提高结肠镜检查的诊断效率,又能让患者更舒适,而且不会影响结肠镜检查的质量。目的确定无需镇静剂的结肠镜检查中 MEI 的功能。材料和方法。这项单中心、前瞻性、随机研究纳入了 120 名患者(20 至 82 岁,平均年龄 51.8 岁;53% 为男性,47% 为女性),他们在门诊接受了常规结肠镜诊断检查,由经验丰富的内镜医师使用 MEI 导航系统,采用旋转技术进行检查。研究分两个阶段进行:第一阶段--随机分组并评估各组的可比性(第一组--MEI,n = 57;第二组--无MEI,n = 63);第二阶段--根据波士顿量表确定结肠镜检查前结肠准备大于6分的患者人数(n = 112:第一研究--MEI组,n = 52;第二对照组,n = 60);比较分析各组之间的盲肠插管频率、盲肠插管时间、VAS疼痛评估(以厘米为单位)。统计分析采用费雪精确检验、双侧曼-惠特尼秩和 U 检验,显著性水平为 0.05。结果与讨论。两组患者在年龄、性别和初步研究适应症方面具有可比性。第 1 组插管盲肠的频率明显更高(100% vs 90%,P < 0.05)。盲肠插管所需的时间没有明显差异(P = 0.258),盲肠插管所需的平均时间差为 22 秒。VAS 疼痛评估也没有发现明显差异(p = 1.023)。我们确定,有经验的内镜医师使用 MEI 进行盲肠插管的频率增加了 10%,达到 100%,而关于缩短盲肠插管时间和提高患者舒适度的观点未得到证实。结论由经验丰富的内镜医师在进行旋转结肠镜检查时使用 MEI,可将常规结肠镜检查时进行盲肠插管的可能性提高 10%。MEI 不会增加盲肠插管所需的时间,也与无镇静剂结肠镜检查中 VAS 量表上疼痛或不适的频率或强度无关。
Introduction. There are opinions that the use of modern high-tech additional techniques, including a navigation system for positioning a colonoscope (MEI), can both increase the diagnostic efficiency of colonoscopy and its comfort for the patient, and do not affect the quality of colonoscopy. Aim. To determine the capabilities of MEI during colonoscopy without sedation. Materials and methods. The single-center, prospective, randomized study included 120 patients (from 20 to 82 years, mean age 51.8 years; 53% men / 47% women) who underwent routine diagnostic outpatient colonoscopy using a rotational technique by experienced endoscopists using MEI navigation system. The study took place in two stages: Stage 1 – randomization and assessment of group comparability (group 1 – MEI, n = 57 and group 2 – without MEI, n = 63); Stage 2 – determination of the number of patients with colon preparation for colonoscopy according to the Boston scale > 6 points (n = 112: 1st study-MEI group, n = 52 and 2nd control group, n = 60); comparative analysis between groups of the frequency of cecal intubation, time of cecal intubation, pain assessment on the VAS scale in cm. Statistical analysis was carried out using Fisher’s exact test, two-sided Mann-Whitney rank sum U test at a significance level of 0.05. Results and discussion. The groups were comparable in age, gender, preliminary indications for the study. The cecum was intubated significantly more often in group 1 (100% vs 90%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time required for cecal intubation (p = 0.258) and the difference in the mean time required for cecal intubation was 22 seconds. The VAS pain assessment also did not reveal significant differences (p = 1.023). We determined that the increase in the frequency of cecal intubation using MEI by experienced endoscopists increases by 10% and reaches 100%, while the opinion about reducing the time of cecal intubation and improving patient comfort were not confirmed. Conclusion. MEI during rotational colonoscopy performed by experienced endoscopists increases the likelihood of cecal intubation during routine colonoscopy by 10%. MEI does not increase the time required for cecal intubation and is not associated with the frequency or intensity of pain or discomfort on the VAS scale in colonoscopy without sedation.