Comparison of results of two hematological analyzer systems: Dirui BF-7200 and Sysmex XN-1000

Abstract Objectives Complete blood count (CBC) is performed using automated hematology analyzers. It is important that CBC results are comparable, reproducible, and reliable. In this study, our aim is to compare the results of Sysmex XN-1000 and Dirui BF-7200 hematology analyzers. Methods Patient samples randomly selected from the routine workflow for each instrument were measured 20 consecutive times to assess reproducibility. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated for each hematological parameter. A comparison of results from the evaluated Dirui BF-7200 system with those from the current hematology analyzer Sysmex XN-1000 system was made for all of the samples included in the study. The compatibility between the parameters was evaluated using Passing–Bablok and Bland–Altman analyses. Results The within-run CV% values were outside the desirable biological variation database (European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine) specification for CV% for eosinophil, basophil, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width expressed as standard deviation in the Sysmex XN-1000 instrument and eosinophil, basophil, hematocrit and indexes of red blood cell and platelet in the Dirui BF-7200 instrument. When the Bland–Altman and Passing–Bablok analysis results were evaluated together, most parameters showed poor agreement; only white blood cells and lymphocytes showed good agreement between the two instruments. Conclusions As there is variability between results from different hematology analyzers, we recommend analyzing patient samples in the same laboratory using the same analyzer to avoid different results that could be misinterpreted.