英国高等法院驳回针对壳牌董事会的衍生索赔请求

Maurits Dolmans, James Brady-Banzet, Naomi Tarawali, Amélie Champsaur, Andreas Wildner
{"title":"英国高等法院驳回针对壳牌董事会的衍生索赔请求","authors":"Maurits Dolmans, James Brady-Banzet, Naomi Tarawali, Amélie Champsaur, Andreas Wildner","doi":"10.4337/eecj.2022.04.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2023, ClientEarth, a non-profit environmental law organization, had issued proceedings before the English High Court against the board of directors of Shell plc. ClientEarth alleged that Shell’s directors had failed to properly take into account the implications for the company of the economy’s net-zero transition and the resulting risks to the company’s business model, which, ClientEarth alleged, amounted to a breach of some of the directors’ duties under the Companies Act 2006. The claim had been brought by way of a derivative action, whereby ClientEarth sued in its capacity as a shareholder of Shell, in respect of a cause of action vested in Shell and seeking relief on behalf of the company. The High Court refused to grant ClientEarth permission to pursue its claim. Following a hearing on costs, ClientEarth was also ordered to pay the company’s and the directors’ costs in connection with all aspects of the action.","PeriodicalId":102274,"journal":{"name":"The European Energy and Climate Journal","volume":"170 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English High Court refuses permission for derivative claim against Shell’s Board of Directors\",\"authors\":\"Maurits Dolmans, James Brady-Banzet, Naomi Tarawali, Amélie Champsaur, Andreas Wildner\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/eecj.2022.04.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In February 2023, ClientEarth, a non-profit environmental law organization, had issued proceedings before the English High Court against the board of directors of Shell plc. ClientEarth alleged that Shell’s directors had failed to properly take into account the implications for the company of the economy’s net-zero transition and the resulting risks to the company’s business model, which, ClientEarth alleged, amounted to a breach of some of the directors’ duties under the Companies Act 2006. The claim had been brought by way of a derivative action, whereby ClientEarth sued in its capacity as a shareholder of Shell, in respect of a cause of action vested in Shell and seeking relief on behalf of the company. The High Court refused to grant ClientEarth permission to pursue its claim. Following a hearing on costs, ClientEarth was also ordered to pay the company’s and the directors’ costs in connection with all aspects of the action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Energy and Climate Journal\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Energy and Climate Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/eecj.2022.04.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Energy and Climate Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/eecj.2022.04.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年 2 月,非营利性环境法组织 ClientEarth 在英国高等法院对壳牌公司董事会提起诉讼。ClientEarth 声称,壳牌公司的董事未能适当考虑到经济净零转型对公司的影响以及由此给公司商业模式带来的风险,ClientEarth 声称,这相当于违反了《2006 年公司法》规定的董事的部分职责。ClientEarth 公司是以衍生诉讼的方式提起诉讼的,即以壳牌公司股东的身份就壳牌公司的诉因提起诉讼,并代表该公司寻求救济。高等法院拒绝批准 ClientEarth 提出索赔。在对费用进行听证后,ClientEarth 还被命令支付公司和董事在诉讼所有方面的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
English High Court refuses permission for derivative claim against Shell’s Board of Directors
In February 2023, ClientEarth, a non-profit environmental law organization, had issued proceedings before the English High Court against the board of directors of Shell plc. ClientEarth alleged that Shell’s directors had failed to properly take into account the implications for the company of the economy’s net-zero transition and the resulting risks to the company’s business model, which, ClientEarth alleged, amounted to a breach of some of the directors’ duties under the Companies Act 2006. The claim had been brought by way of a derivative action, whereby ClientEarth sued in its capacity as a shareholder of Shell, in respect of a cause of action vested in Shell and seeking relief on behalf of the company. The High Court refused to grant ClientEarth permission to pursue its claim. Following a hearing on costs, ClientEarth was also ordered to pay the company’s and the directors’ costs in connection with all aspects of the action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TSO-DSO interface for Net Zero: the German case of 50Hertz and its DSO neighbour TEN Thüringer Energienetz* Examining stakeholder trust levels in committing to climate change action The ‘new’ Renewable Energy Directive (RED III): an overview EU legislators approve the electricity market reform Is healthcare sustainable?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1