蓝宝石光学器件,用于抗污染和极高功率密度应用

Laser Damage Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1117/12.2685118
Sam Zilavy, Adam Argondizzo, Kyle Branigan, Gregg E. Davis
{"title":"蓝宝石光学器件,用于抗污染和极高功率密度应用","authors":"Sam Zilavy, Adam Argondizzo, Kyle Branigan, Gregg E. Davis","doi":"10.1117/12.2685118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The power available in many industrial high-power 1 µm laser-cutting systems now exceeds 10 kW. To take advantage of that power, systems must be fast and nimble in order to accurately trace toolpaths at high speed. These power levels drive focusing head designs to be compact and lightweight. The best way to achieve this, in general, is with an all-transmissive design consisting of lenses and windows. The industry-standard material for lenses is fused silica, which has extremely low absorption. However, should the lens become contaminated, the poor thermal conductivity of fused silica traps much of the absorbed power inside the optic, raising its temperature and index of refraction, which causes the focus of the system to shift back toward the focusing head. At some point, the amount of focus shift becomes unsuitable for material processing and the focusing head must be replaced or refurbished with clean optics. Sapphire is an alternative lens material that until recently was only used in windows due to optical fabrication challenges in the polishing of aspheric surfaces. At Coherent Corp., we have overcome many of those challenges and currently offer sapphire aspheres. The key advantage of sapphire over fused silica is its relatively high thermal conductivity. This enables any absorbed power to quickly reach the edge of a sapphire optic where water-cooled mounts can remove the heat and keep the lens temperature low. Accounting for all the property differences between the two materials, sapphire should result in less focus shift than a comparable fused silica optic with the same absorbed power. The purpose of this study is to measure and compare the focus shift properties of the two materials in a controlled setting at high and low levels of absorbed power. Sapphire was also tested for laser-induced-damage threshold (LIDT) by Spica Technologies Inc.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":"124 1","pages":"1272604 - 1272604-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sapphire optics for contamination resistance and extreme power density applications\",\"authors\":\"Sam Zilavy, Adam Argondizzo, Kyle Branigan, Gregg E. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2685118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The power available in many industrial high-power 1 µm laser-cutting systems now exceeds 10 kW. To take advantage of that power, systems must be fast and nimble in order to accurately trace toolpaths at high speed. These power levels drive focusing head designs to be compact and lightweight. The best way to achieve this, in general, is with an all-transmissive design consisting of lenses and windows. The industry-standard material for lenses is fused silica, which has extremely low absorption. However, should the lens become contaminated, the poor thermal conductivity of fused silica traps much of the absorbed power inside the optic, raising its temperature and index of refraction, which causes the focus of the system to shift back toward the focusing head. At some point, the amount of focus shift becomes unsuitable for material processing and the focusing head must be replaced or refurbished with clean optics. Sapphire is an alternative lens material that until recently was only used in windows due to optical fabrication challenges in the polishing of aspheric surfaces. At Coherent Corp., we have overcome many of those challenges and currently offer sapphire aspheres. The key advantage of sapphire over fused silica is its relatively high thermal conductivity. This enables any absorbed power to quickly reach the edge of a sapphire optic where water-cooled mounts can remove the heat and keep the lens temperature low. Accounting for all the property differences between the two materials, sapphire should result in less focus shift than a comparable fused silica optic with the same absorbed power. The purpose of this study is to measure and compare the focus shift properties of the two materials in a controlled setting at high and low levels of absorbed power. Sapphire was also tested for laser-induced-damage threshold (LIDT) by Spica Technologies Inc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser Damage\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"1272604 - 1272604-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser Damage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2685118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2685118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,许多工业用高功率 1 µm 激光切割系统的功率已超过 10 kW。为了充分利用这种功率,系统必须快速灵活,以便高速准确地跟踪刀具路径。这些功率水平促使聚焦头的设计必须紧凑、轻便。一般来说,实现这一目标的最佳方法是采用由透镜和窗口组成的全透射设计。透镜的行业标准材料是熔融石英,其吸收率极低。然而,如果透镜受到污染,熔融石英的不良导热性会将大部分吸收功率吸附在光学器件内部,从而提高其温度和折射率,导致系统的焦点向聚焦头后移。在某些情况下,焦距偏移量不适合材料加工,聚焦头必须更换或翻新为干净的光学器件。蓝宝石是一种可供选择的透镜材料,但由于非球面表面抛光的光学制造难题,这种材料直到最近才被用于窗户。在 Coherent 公司,我们已经克服了其中的许多挑战,目前可提供蓝宝石非球面。与熔融石英相比,蓝宝石的主要优势在于其相对较高的热传导率。这使得任何吸收的功率都能迅速到达蓝宝石光学元件的边缘,在那里,水冷支架可以带走热量并保持透镜的低温。考虑到两种材料之间的所有特性差异,在吸收功率相同的情况下,蓝宝石应该比熔融石英光学镜片的焦距偏移更小。本研究的目的是测量和比较两种材料在高吸收功率和低吸收功率条件下的聚焦偏移特性。Spica Technologies 公司还对蓝宝石进行了激光诱导损伤阈值(LIDT)测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sapphire optics for contamination resistance and extreme power density applications
The power available in many industrial high-power 1 µm laser-cutting systems now exceeds 10 kW. To take advantage of that power, systems must be fast and nimble in order to accurately trace toolpaths at high speed. These power levels drive focusing head designs to be compact and lightweight. The best way to achieve this, in general, is with an all-transmissive design consisting of lenses and windows. The industry-standard material for lenses is fused silica, which has extremely low absorption. However, should the lens become contaminated, the poor thermal conductivity of fused silica traps much of the absorbed power inside the optic, raising its temperature and index of refraction, which causes the focus of the system to shift back toward the focusing head. At some point, the amount of focus shift becomes unsuitable for material processing and the focusing head must be replaced or refurbished with clean optics. Sapphire is an alternative lens material that until recently was only used in windows due to optical fabrication challenges in the polishing of aspheric surfaces. At Coherent Corp., we have overcome many of those challenges and currently offer sapphire aspheres. The key advantage of sapphire over fused silica is its relatively high thermal conductivity. This enables any absorbed power to quickly reach the edge of a sapphire optic where water-cooled mounts can remove the heat and keep the lens temperature low. Accounting for all the property differences between the two materials, sapphire should result in less focus shift than a comparable fused silica optic with the same absorbed power. The purpose of this study is to measure and compare the focus shift properties of the two materials in a controlled setting at high and low levels of absorbed power. Sapphire was also tested for laser-induced-damage threshold (LIDT) by Spica Technologies Inc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
All-glass metasurface laser optics for lensing, antireflections, and waveplates Laser-induced damage of dielectric-enhanced surface-modified single-point-diamond-turned Al-6061 multiband mirrors Optical damage considerations in the design of the matter in extreme condition upgrade (MEC-U) laser systems Broadband, 920-nm mirror thin film damage competition Temporally and spatially resolved photoluminescence of laser-induced damage sites of fused silica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1