{"title":"亚历克斯在科威特:自动化过程中的文化冲突","authors":"Frank Peter Jordan, Anna Lašáková","doi":"10.1108/eemcs-05-2023-0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning outcomes After completion of the case study, the students will be able to understand the importance of being culturally savvy when working in a culturally diverse environment and managing people from different cultures; critically reflect on the risks resulting from the absence of a clear direction from the company’s top management regarding unifying corporate values and a diversity policy for cooperation across cultures; be aware of best practices in implementing diversity management (DM) initiatives in the company; and learn that changes in the strategic orientation (i.e. focus on automation projects) must be cascaded down to hard elements of structures, processes and systems, as well as to soft elements of skills, staff and management style. Case overview/synopsis The Kuwaiti branch of a Japanese corporation specialising in control systems and instruments, Rising Sun IT, hired a German professional, Alex, to handle the increasing demand for automation from customers. This recruitment followed several unsuccessful attempts by the company to deliver more advanced automation solutions. Recognising the need to adapt to Kuwaiti customer requirements or risk losing market share, Japanese management understood the importance of transforming their engineering staff. Failure to achieve this next automation step would result in a steady decline in market share and ultimately impact the company’s survival. However, Alex, who was supposed to lead automation projects, was confronted with opposition from the Indian engineering staff and managers. He was not able to find common ground with the staff and perceived issues such as lack of communication, delays in work schedules, missed deadlines and high levels of absenteeism, as a sign of low work morale. Although he tried to increase the awareness of his supervisor and other managers by informing them repeatedly about the problems regarding employee behaviours, his interventions went unheard. He felt ousted by his fellow colleagues and the other employees. Besides, from Alex’s point of view, the Japanese top management did not provide clear directions to the staff and explicit support to Alex in his efforts. This case study highlights three dimensions of Alex’s problem with establishing and maintaining working relationships with other people in the company:▪ Alex’s cultural “blindness” and ignorance of differences in work behaviours that ultimately led to his inability to build solid and trustful relationships with other employees. The case study demonstrates Germany’s performance-oriented and individual-centric culture versus India’s family- and community-oriented culture and the Japanese employees’ strongly hierarchical and company loyalty-oriented culture.▪ Lack of support from the Japanese top management to Alex, which is connected with a wider problem of the lack of a systematic strategic approach to managing a culturally diverse workforce. The case study pinpoints the rhetoric–reality gap in DM in the company, where the diversity, equity and inclusion programme and corporate values were applied only formally and had little attention from the leaders as well as non-managerial employees.▪ Employee resistance to change: The lack of positive communication from the top management level in the company regarding automation projects and the lack of support for Alex’s mission in the company resulted in steady resistance to executing projects, which endangered the company’s survival in the market. Also, one part of Alex’s problem with building a working relationship with the Indian engineering staff was based on the fact that others perceived him as the automation “change agent” – an advocate and catalyst of an undesirable change connected with adverse consequences on employment in the Indian community. Complexity academic level This case is intended for discussion in undergraduate management and business study programmes. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 6: Human resource management.","PeriodicalId":36648,"journal":{"name":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alex in Kuwait: clash of cultures amidst automation\",\"authors\":\"Frank Peter Jordan, Anna Lašáková\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/eemcs-05-2023-0177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning outcomes After completion of the case study, the students will be able to understand the importance of being culturally savvy when working in a culturally diverse environment and managing people from different cultures; critically reflect on the risks resulting from the absence of a clear direction from the company’s top management regarding unifying corporate values and a diversity policy for cooperation across cultures; be aware of best practices in implementing diversity management (DM) initiatives in the company; and learn that changes in the strategic orientation (i.e. focus on automation projects) must be cascaded down to hard elements of structures, processes and systems, as well as to soft elements of skills, staff and management style. Case overview/synopsis The Kuwaiti branch of a Japanese corporation specialising in control systems and instruments, Rising Sun IT, hired a German professional, Alex, to handle the increasing demand for automation from customers. This recruitment followed several unsuccessful attempts by the company to deliver more advanced automation solutions. Recognising the need to adapt to Kuwaiti customer requirements or risk losing market share, Japanese management understood the importance of transforming their engineering staff. Failure to achieve this next automation step would result in a steady decline in market share and ultimately impact the company’s survival. However, Alex, who was supposed to lead automation projects, was confronted with opposition from the Indian engineering staff and managers. He was not able to find common ground with the staff and perceived issues such as lack of communication, delays in work schedules, missed deadlines and high levels of absenteeism, as a sign of low work morale. Although he tried to increase the awareness of his supervisor and other managers by informing them repeatedly about the problems regarding employee behaviours, his interventions went unheard. He felt ousted by his fellow colleagues and the other employees. Besides, from Alex’s point of view, the Japanese top management did not provide clear directions to the staff and explicit support to Alex in his efforts. This case study highlights three dimensions of Alex’s problem with establishing and maintaining working relationships with other people in the company:▪ Alex’s cultural “blindness” and ignorance of differences in work behaviours that ultimately led to his inability to build solid and trustful relationships with other employees. The case study demonstrates Germany’s performance-oriented and individual-centric culture versus India’s family- and community-oriented culture and the Japanese employees’ strongly hierarchical and company loyalty-oriented culture.▪ Lack of support from the Japanese top management to Alex, which is connected with a wider problem of the lack of a systematic strategic approach to managing a culturally diverse workforce. The case study pinpoints the rhetoric–reality gap in DM in the company, where the diversity, equity and inclusion programme and corporate values were applied only formally and had little attention from the leaders as well as non-managerial employees.▪ Employee resistance to change: The lack of positive communication from the top management level in the company regarding automation projects and the lack of support for Alex’s mission in the company resulted in steady resistance to executing projects, which endangered the company’s survival in the market. Also, one part of Alex’s problem with building a working relationship with the Indian engineering staff was based on the fact that others perceived him as the automation “change agent” – an advocate and catalyst of an undesirable change connected with adverse consequences on employment in the Indian community. Complexity academic level This case is intended for discussion in undergraduate management and business study programmes. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 6: Human resource management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-05-2023-0177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-05-2023-0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
学习成果 完成案例研究后,学生将能够理解在多元文化环境中工作和管理来自不同文化的人员时,具备文化意识的重要性;批判性地反思公司高层管理者在统一企业价值观和跨文化合作的多元化政策方面缺乏明确方向所带来的风险;了解在公司实施多元化管理(DM)措施的最佳实践;了解战略方向的变化(即对自动化项目的关注)必须逐级向下延伸到结构、流程和系统等硬要素以及技能、员工和管理风格等软要素。了解战略方向的变化(即对自动化项目的关注)必须向下延伸到结构、流程和系统等硬要素,以及技能、员工和管理风格等软要素。 案例概述 一家专门从事控制系统和仪器的日本公司 Rising Sun IT 的科威特分公司聘请了一名德国专业人员 Alex 来处理客户日益增长的自动化需求。此前,该公司曾多次尝试提供更先进的自动化解决方案,但均未成功。日本管理层认识到,必须适应科威特客户的要求,否则就有可能失去市场份额,因此他们深知改造工程技术人员的重要性。如果不能实现下一步自动化,市场份额就会持续下降,最终影响公司的生存。然而,本应领导自动化项目的亚历克斯却遭到了印度工程技术人员和管理人员的反对。他无法找到与员工的共同点,并认为缺乏沟通、工作计划延误、错过最后期限和高缺勤率等问题是工作士气低落的表现。尽管他试图提高上司和其他管理人员的认识,反复告知他们有关员工行为的问题,但他的干预却无人理睬。他觉得自己被同事和其他员工撵走了。此外,从艾利克斯的角度来看,日本高层管理者并没有为员工提供明确的指导,也没有为艾利克斯的努力提供明确的支持。本案例研究强调了亚历克斯在与公司其他人建立和保持工作关系方面存在的三个方面的问题: ▪ 亚历克斯的文化 "盲目性 "和对工作行为差异的无知,最终导致他无法与其他员工建立稳固和相互信任的关系。案例研究表明,德国的文化以绩效为导向、以个人为中心,而印度的文化以家庭和社区为导向,日本员工的文化则以等级制度和公司忠诚度为导向。案例研究指出了该公司在管理方面存在的言辞与现实之间的差距,即多样性、公平和包容计划以及企业价值观只是在形式上得到了应用,很少受到领导者以及非管理层员工的关注:员工对变革的抵触情绪:公司最高管理层对自动化项目缺乏积极沟通,公司内部对艾利克斯的使命缺乏支持,导致项目执行过程中阻力重重,危及公司在市场上的生存。此外,亚历克斯在与印度工程技术人员建立工作关系时遇到的一个问题是,其他人认为他是自动化 "变革的推动者"--一种不良变革的倡导者和催化剂,会对印度社区的就业产生不利影响。 复杂性 学术水平 本案例适用于本科管理和商业研究课程的讨论。 补充材料 教学说明仅供教育工作者使用。 科目代码 CSS 6:人力资源管理。
Alex in Kuwait: clash of cultures amidst automation
Learning outcomes After completion of the case study, the students will be able to understand the importance of being culturally savvy when working in a culturally diverse environment and managing people from different cultures; critically reflect on the risks resulting from the absence of a clear direction from the company’s top management regarding unifying corporate values and a diversity policy for cooperation across cultures; be aware of best practices in implementing diversity management (DM) initiatives in the company; and learn that changes in the strategic orientation (i.e. focus on automation projects) must be cascaded down to hard elements of structures, processes and systems, as well as to soft elements of skills, staff and management style. Case overview/synopsis The Kuwaiti branch of a Japanese corporation specialising in control systems and instruments, Rising Sun IT, hired a German professional, Alex, to handle the increasing demand for automation from customers. This recruitment followed several unsuccessful attempts by the company to deliver more advanced automation solutions. Recognising the need to adapt to Kuwaiti customer requirements or risk losing market share, Japanese management understood the importance of transforming their engineering staff. Failure to achieve this next automation step would result in a steady decline in market share and ultimately impact the company’s survival. However, Alex, who was supposed to lead automation projects, was confronted with opposition from the Indian engineering staff and managers. He was not able to find common ground with the staff and perceived issues such as lack of communication, delays in work schedules, missed deadlines and high levels of absenteeism, as a sign of low work morale. Although he tried to increase the awareness of his supervisor and other managers by informing them repeatedly about the problems regarding employee behaviours, his interventions went unheard. He felt ousted by his fellow colleagues and the other employees. Besides, from Alex’s point of view, the Japanese top management did not provide clear directions to the staff and explicit support to Alex in his efforts. This case study highlights three dimensions of Alex’s problem with establishing and maintaining working relationships with other people in the company:▪ Alex’s cultural “blindness” and ignorance of differences in work behaviours that ultimately led to his inability to build solid and trustful relationships with other employees. The case study demonstrates Germany’s performance-oriented and individual-centric culture versus India’s family- and community-oriented culture and the Japanese employees’ strongly hierarchical and company loyalty-oriented culture.▪ Lack of support from the Japanese top management to Alex, which is connected with a wider problem of the lack of a systematic strategic approach to managing a culturally diverse workforce. The case study pinpoints the rhetoric–reality gap in DM in the company, where the diversity, equity and inclusion programme and corporate values were applied only formally and had little attention from the leaders as well as non-managerial employees.▪ Employee resistance to change: The lack of positive communication from the top management level in the company regarding automation projects and the lack of support for Alex’s mission in the company resulted in steady resistance to executing projects, which endangered the company’s survival in the market. Also, one part of Alex’s problem with building a working relationship with the Indian engineering staff was based on the fact that others perceived him as the automation “change agent” – an advocate and catalyst of an undesirable change connected with adverse consequences on employment in the Indian community. Complexity academic level This case is intended for discussion in undergraduate management and business study programmes. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 6: Human resource management.