纳米比亚土地改革的复杂性:独立 33 年后纳米比亚土地问题概览

K. Mundia, Rebeka Haimbili
{"title":"纳米比亚土地改革的复杂性:独立 33 年后纳米比亚土地问题概览","authors":"K. Mundia, Rebeka Haimbili","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is trite that at independence in 1990 Namibia inherited a skewed land distribution system in favour of a white minority, which necessitated the newly elected government to take drastic steps to redress the historical injustices pertaining to land ownership. The steps taken to address the land issue were birthed at the first National Conference on Land in 1991. This article investigates those measures and their effectiveness or lack thereof in satisfactorily solving the land question. One of those measures is the Willing-Seller Willing-Buyer Policy (WSWB) which, together with the legislative framework on land has failed dismally in ensuring the equitable distribution of land and realising the transformative aims of the Constitution. The article identifies various challenges Namibia faces in addressing the land issue, including the difficulty in implementing a mandatory policy of expropriation of private lands without compensation in a capitalist society. It further criticises the concept of national reconciliation adopted at the first National Land Conference in that it may have deprived the country of an opportunity to holistically address the skewed land distribution system once and for all. The article finds that the major constraints to meaningful land reform in Namibia are contained in the legislative framework and policies on land, which emanate from pre-independence provisions contained in the 1982 Constitutional Principles. The article also finds that due to those inherent constraints in the legislative framework, it is impossible to realise the transformative aims of the Constitution which include, equality in land distribution. There is therefore a need to rethink land reform in Namibia. In this regard, it is imperative to infuse the concept of restorative justice in the debate of land and to compel private landowners to participate in the process of land reform.","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intricacies of Land Reform in Namibia: An Overview of the Land Question in Namibia 33 Years After Independence\",\"authors\":\"K. Mundia, Rebeka Haimbili\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is trite that at independence in 1990 Namibia inherited a skewed land distribution system in favour of a white minority, which necessitated the newly elected government to take drastic steps to redress the historical injustices pertaining to land ownership. The steps taken to address the land issue were birthed at the first National Conference on Land in 1991. This article investigates those measures and their effectiveness or lack thereof in satisfactorily solving the land question. One of those measures is the Willing-Seller Willing-Buyer Policy (WSWB) which, together with the legislative framework on land has failed dismally in ensuring the equitable distribution of land and realising the transformative aims of the Constitution. The article identifies various challenges Namibia faces in addressing the land issue, including the difficulty in implementing a mandatory policy of expropriation of private lands without compensation in a capitalist society. It further criticises the concept of national reconciliation adopted at the first National Land Conference in that it may have deprived the country of an opportunity to holistically address the skewed land distribution system once and for all. The article finds that the major constraints to meaningful land reform in Namibia are contained in the legislative framework and policies on land, which emanate from pre-independence provisions contained in the 1982 Constitutional Principles. The article also finds that due to those inherent constraints in the legislative framework, it is impossible to realise the transformative aims of the Constitution which include, equality in land distribution. There is therefore a need to rethink land reform in Namibia. In this regard, it is imperative to infuse the concept of restorative justice in the debate of land and to compel private landowners to participate in the process of land reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老生常谈的是,1990 年纳米比亚独立时,继承了有利于少数白人的倾斜的土地分配制度,这使得新当选的政府必须采取严厉措施,纠正与土地所有权有关的历史不公正现象。1991 年召开的第一次全国土地会议提出了解决土地问题的措施。本文对这些措施及其在圆满解决土地问题方面的成效或不足进行了调查。其中一项措施是 "愿卖愿买政策"(WSWB),该政策与有关土地的立法框架一起,在确保公平分配土地和实现《宪法》的改革目标方面失败得令人沮丧。文章指出了纳米比亚在解决土地问题时所面临的各种挑战,包括在资本主义社会中实施强制性无偿征用私人土地政策的困难。文章还批评了第一次全国土地会议通过的民族和解概念,因为这一概念可能剥夺了该国一劳永逸地全面解决倾斜的土地分配制度的机会。文章认为,纳米比亚进行有意义的土地改革的主要制约因素是源自 1982 年《宪法原则》所载独立前条款的土地立法框架和政策。文章还认为,由于立法框架中的这些固有制约因素,不可能实现《宪法》中包括土地分配平等在内的改革目标。因此,有必要重新思考纳米比亚的土地改革。在这方面,必须在有关土地的辩论中注入恢复性正义的概念,并迫使私人土地所有者参与土地改革进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Intricacies of Land Reform in Namibia: An Overview of the Land Question in Namibia 33 Years After Independence
It is trite that at independence in 1990 Namibia inherited a skewed land distribution system in favour of a white minority, which necessitated the newly elected government to take drastic steps to redress the historical injustices pertaining to land ownership. The steps taken to address the land issue were birthed at the first National Conference on Land in 1991. This article investigates those measures and their effectiveness or lack thereof in satisfactorily solving the land question. One of those measures is the Willing-Seller Willing-Buyer Policy (WSWB) which, together with the legislative framework on land has failed dismally in ensuring the equitable distribution of land and realising the transformative aims of the Constitution. The article identifies various challenges Namibia faces in addressing the land issue, including the difficulty in implementing a mandatory policy of expropriation of private lands without compensation in a capitalist society. It further criticises the concept of national reconciliation adopted at the first National Land Conference in that it may have deprived the country of an opportunity to holistically address the skewed land distribution system once and for all. The article finds that the major constraints to meaningful land reform in Namibia are contained in the legislative framework and policies on land, which emanate from pre-independence provisions contained in the 1982 Constitutional Principles. The article also finds that due to those inherent constraints in the legislative framework, it is impossible to realise the transformative aims of the Constitution which include, equality in land distribution. There is therefore a need to rethink land reform in Namibia. In this regard, it is imperative to infuse the concept of restorative justice in the debate of land and to compel private landowners to participate in the process of land reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies in Online Dispute Resolution: A Solution to Consumer Disputes in South Africa? Safeguarding the Rights of Children Living in Kinship Care in South Africa "Cause of Action": How Could the Supreme Court of Appeal Get it so Wrong? Olesitse v Minister of Police (SCA) (Unreported) Case No: 470/2021 of 15 June 2022 Navigating Reputational Risks: Cautionary Considerations for South African Banks in the Unilateral Termination of Bank-Customer Relationships An Overview of the Extent of the Powers of South African Competition Authorities in the Regulation of Price Discrimination under the Competition Act 89 of 1998 in the Context of Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1