南非环境法与政治问责制:聚焦地方议会

Nonhlanhla Ngcobo
{"title":"南非环境法与政治问责制:聚焦地方议会","authors":"Nonhlanhla Ngcobo","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a17260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is facing an environmental crisis threatening human and non-human existence. Various actors are responding to this crisis, including politicians, international non-governmental organisations, transnational organisations and scientific communities. Municipalities are governing entities in cities and are deemed critical actors to help respond at a sub-national level to the global environmental crisis. In terms of sections 151(2) and 156(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution) municipal councils have executive and legislative authority over local environmental governance (LEG) matters listed in Schedules 4B and 5B of the Constitution, thus making municipal councils the highest South African authority with legal and political powers in local communities. This article uses the constitutions, policies, and manifestos of political parties active in the local government sphere to ascertain the role of political parties in (local) environmental governance. The aim of this inquiry is to investigate how political parties in South Africa conceive of their accountability in the environmental governance context. The assumption is that unless councillors are politically inclined and are expressly expected at party level to pursue ecologically sustainable development, municipalities will not be able to fulfill their role in the urgently needed transition. The article finds that municipal councils are accountable for environmental governance and should improve on thisnresponsibility. The accountability should start with parties making explicit environmental commitments and holding their councillors accountable for failing to fulfil them.","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"39 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South African Environmental Law and Political Accountability: Local Councils in the Spotlight\",\"authors\":\"Nonhlanhla Ngcobo\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a17260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The world is facing an environmental crisis threatening human and non-human existence. Various actors are responding to this crisis, including politicians, international non-governmental organisations, transnational organisations and scientific communities. Municipalities are governing entities in cities and are deemed critical actors to help respond at a sub-national level to the global environmental crisis. In terms of sections 151(2) and 156(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution) municipal councils have executive and legislative authority over local environmental governance (LEG) matters listed in Schedules 4B and 5B of the Constitution, thus making municipal councils the highest South African authority with legal and political powers in local communities. This article uses the constitutions, policies, and manifestos of political parties active in the local government sphere to ascertain the role of political parties in (local) environmental governance. The aim of this inquiry is to investigate how political parties in South Africa conceive of their accountability in the environmental governance context. The assumption is that unless councillors are politically inclined and are expressly expected at party level to pursue ecologically sustainable development, municipalities will not be able to fulfill their role in the urgently needed transition. The article finds that municipal councils are accountable for environmental governance and should improve on thisnresponsibility. The accountability should start with parties making explicit environmental commitments and holding their councillors accountable for failing to fulfil them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a17260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a17260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界正面临着威胁人类和非人类生存的环境危机。包括政治家、国际非政府组织、跨国组织和科学界在内的各种行为体都在应对这场危机。市政当局是城市的管理实体,被认为是在国家以下层面帮助应对全球环境危机的关键行为体。根据 1996 年《南非共和国宪法》(《宪法》)第 151(2)条和第 156(1)条,市议会对《宪法》附表 4B 和 5B 所列的地方环境治理(LEG)事项拥有行政和立法权,从而使市议会成为在地方社区拥有法律和政治权力的南非最高权力机构。本文利用活跃在地方政府领域的政党的宪法、政策和宣言来确定政党在(地方)环境治理中的作用。这项调查旨在研究南非政党如何看待其在环境治理中的责任。我们的假设是,除非议员具有政治倾向,并且政党层面明确要求他们追求生态可持续发展,否则市政当局将无法在迫切需要的转型中发挥作用。文章认为,市议会对环境治理负有责任,并应加强这一责任。首先,各政党应做出明确的环境承诺,并追究未能履行承诺的市议员的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
South African Environmental Law and Political Accountability: Local Councils in the Spotlight
The world is facing an environmental crisis threatening human and non-human existence. Various actors are responding to this crisis, including politicians, international non-governmental organisations, transnational organisations and scientific communities. Municipalities are governing entities in cities and are deemed critical actors to help respond at a sub-national level to the global environmental crisis. In terms of sections 151(2) and 156(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution) municipal councils have executive and legislative authority over local environmental governance (LEG) matters listed in Schedules 4B and 5B of the Constitution, thus making municipal councils the highest South African authority with legal and political powers in local communities. This article uses the constitutions, policies, and manifestos of political parties active in the local government sphere to ascertain the role of political parties in (local) environmental governance. The aim of this inquiry is to investigate how political parties in South Africa conceive of their accountability in the environmental governance context. The assumption is that unless councillors are politically inclined and are expressly expected at party level to pursue ecologically sustainable development, municipalities will not be able to fulfill their role in the urgently needed transition. The article finds that municipal councils are accountable for environmental governance and should improve on thisnresponsibility. The accountability should start with parties making explicit environmental commitments and holding their councillors accountable for failing to fulfil them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies in Online Dispute Resolution: A Solution to Consumer Disputes in South Africa? Safeguarding the Rights of Children Living in Kinship Care in South Africa "Cause of Action": How Could the Supreme Court of Appeal Get it so Wrong? Olesitse v Minister of Police (SCA) (Unreported) Case No: 470/2021 of 15 June 2022 Navigating Reputational Risks: Cautionary Considerations for South African Banks in the Unilateral Termination of Bank-Customer Relationships An Overview of the Extent of the Powers of South African Competition Authorities in the Regulation of Price Discrimination under the Competition Act 89 of 1998 in the Context of Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1