以团队为基础的医疗模式提高了普通心脏病学治疗的及时性和患者满意度

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1097/jhq.0000000000000413
Christa M. Sharpe, Linda Eastham
{"title":"以团队为基础的医疗模式提高了普通心脏病学治疗的及时性和患者满意度","authors":"Christa M. Sharpe, Linda Eastham","doi":"10.1097/jhq.0000000000000413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appointment wait times have increased nationally since 2014, especially in cardiology. At a mid-Atlantic academic medical center, access to care in the general cardiology clinic was below national standards, which can negatively affect patient outcomes and satisfaction. Adopting a team-based care (TBC) model, advanced practice providers (APPs) were added to care teams with general cardiologists to provide timely outpatient management of cardiac conditions. This aimed to increase access to care and, consequently, patient satisfaction. A formative program evaluation using the Agency for Clinical Innovation framework assessed TBC's impact on these outcomes. Access to care and patient satisfaction measures for TBC and nonteam providers were compared with one another and national benchmarks. Nine months after implementation, the average time to new patient appointment for TBC providers was 31 days (47% decrease) and for nonteam providers was 41 days (20% decrease). TBC had a higher percentage of new patient appointments within 14 days than nonteam providers (39% and 20%, respectively). Patient satisfaction improved to the 98th percentile nationally for TBC but decreased to the 71st percentile for nonteam. These findings suggest that a TBC model using APPs can improve access to care and patient satisfaction in the outpatient general cardiology setting.","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team-Based Care Model Improves Timely Access to Care and Patient Satisfaction in General Cardiology\",\"authors\":\"Christa M. Sharpe, Linda Eastham\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jhq.0000000000000413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Appointment wait times have increased nationally since 2014, especially in cardiology. At a mid-Atlantic academic medical center, access to care in the general cardiology clinic was below national standards, which can negatively affect patient outcomes and satisfaction. Adopting a team-based care (TBC) model, advanced practice providers (APPs) were added to care teams with general cardiologists to provide timely outpatient management of cardiac conditions. This aimed to increase access to care and, consequently, patient satisfaction. A formative program evaluation using the Agency for Clinical Innovation framework assessed TBC's impact on these outcomes. Access to care and patient satisfaction measures for TBC and nonteam providers were compared with one another and national benchmarks. Nine months after implementation, the average time to new patient appointment for TBC providers was 31 days (47% decrease) and for nonteam providers was 41 days (20% decrease). TBC had a higher percentage of new patient appointments within 14 days than nonteam providers (39% and 20%, respectively). Patient satisfaction improved to the 98th percentile nationally for TBC but decreased to the 71st percentile for nonteam. These findings suggest that a TBC model using APPs can improve access to care and patient satisfaction in the outpatient general cardiology setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000413\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2014 年以来,全国的预约等候时间有所增加,尤其是心脏病科。在大西洋中部的一家学术医疗中心,普通心脏病诊所的就诊率低于国家标准,这可能会对患者的治疗效果和满意度产生负面影响。该中心采用团队护理(TBC)模式,将高级医疗服务提供者(APP)加入到普通心脏病专家的护理团队中,为心脏病患者提供及时的门诊管理。此举旨在提高医疗服务的可及性,从而提高患者的满意度。一项采用临床创新机构框架进行的形成性项目评价评估了 TBC 对这些结果的影响。对 TBC 和非团队医疗服务提供者的就医情况和患者满意度进行了比较,并将两者与国家基准进行了比较。实施九个月后,TBC 医疗服务提供者的新患者预约平均时间为 31 天(减少 47%),非团队医疗服务提供者的新患者预约平均时间为 41 天(减少 20%)。与非团队医疗服务提供者相比,TBC 医疗服务提供者在 14 天内完成新病人预约的比例更高(分别为 39% 和 20%)。在全国范围内,TBC 的患者满意度提高到了第 98 位,而非团队医疗服务提供者的患者满意度则下降到了第 71 位。这些研究结果表明,在普通心脏病学门诊中,使用 APP 的 TBC 模式可以提高医疗服务的可及性和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Team-Based Care Model Improves Timely Access to Care and Patient Satisfaction in General Cardiology
Appointment wait times have increased nationally since 2014, especially in cardiology. At a mid-Atlantic academic medical center, access to care in the general cardiology clinic was below national standards, which can negatively affect patient outcomes and satisfaction. Adopting a team-based care (TBC) model, advanced practice providers (APPs) were added to care teams with general cardiologists to provide timely outpatient management of cardiac conditions. This aimed to increase access to care and, consequently, patient satisfaction. A formative program evaluation using the Agency for Clinical Innovation framework assessed TBC's impact on these outcomes. Access to care and patient satisfaction measures for TBC and nonteam providers were compared with one another and national benchmarks. Nine months after implementation, the average time to new patient appointment for TBC providers was 31 days (47% decrease) and for nonteam providers was 41 days (20% decrease). TBC had a higher percentage of new patient appointments within 14 days than nonteam providers (39% and 20%, respectively). Patient satisfaction improved to the 98th percentile nationally for TBC but decreased to the 71st percentile for nonteam. These findings suggest that a TBC model using APPs can improve access to care and patient satisfaction in the outpatient general cardiology setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Continuous Quality Improvement in Social Needs Screening: Evaluation of an Intervention in Bariatric Specialty Care. Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: Pitfalls and Potential. Using Broken Windows Theory to Examine Flow Disruptions in Surgical Care: A Multispecialty Comparison. Optimizing Workplace Violence Reporting in a Multisite Hospital Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1