确认偏差、数据操纵和库兹涅茨曲线:原始、环境和金融

E. Merza, Mohammad Alawin
{"title":"确认偏差、数据操纵和库兹涅茨曲线:原始、环境和金融","authors":"E. Merza, Mohammad Alawin","doi":"10.22158/jepf.v9n4p115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical work in economics and finance involves data manipulation in ways that make it possible to confirm prior beliefs. The results typically turn out to be sensitive to model specification, sample period, variable definitions and estimation methods. The status quo provides the motivation for dealing with this problem using three versions of the Kuznets curve for the purpose of illustration. The underlying hypotheses are represented by quadratic functions of income per capita, with a different dependent variable for each version of the Kuznets curve. Both time series and cross-sectional data are used to estimate the equations. The results turn out to be highly sensitive to a number of factors, which provides an incentive for being selective in the reporting of results while exhibiting confirmation bias. To overcome the model uncertainty problem one can resort to the use of one of several methods that are based on the reporting of the distribution rather than the point estimation of the coefficients.","PeriodicalId":73718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economics and public finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confirmation Bias, Data Manipulation and the Kuznets Curve: Original, Environmental and Financial\",\"authors\":\"E. Merza, Mohammad Alawin\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/jepf.v9n4p115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical work in economics and finance involves data manipulation in ways that make it possible to confirm prior beliefs. The results typically turn out to be sensitive to model specification, sample period, variable definitions and estimation methods. The status quo provides the motivation for dealing with this problem using three versions of the Kuznets curve for the purpose of illustration. The underlying hypotheses are represented by quadratic functions of income per capita, with a different dependent variable for each version of the Kuznets curve. Both time series and cross-sectional data are used to estimate the equations. The results turn out to be highly sensitive to a number of factors, which provides an incentive for being selective in the reporting of results while exhibiting confirmation bias. To overcome the model uncertainty problem one can resort to the use of one of several methods that are based on the reporting of the distribution rather than the point estimation of the coefficients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economics and public finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economics and public finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v9n4p115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economics and public finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v9n4p115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济学和金融学的实证工作涉及到对数据的处理,从而有可能证实先前的观点。其结果通常对模型规格、样本期、变量定义和估计方法很敏感。现状为我们提供了处理这一问题的动机,为了说明问题,我们使用了三种版本的库兹涅茨曲线。基本假设用人均收入的二次函数表示,每个版本的库兹涅茨曲线都有不同的因变量。时间序列数据和横截面数据都用于估计方程。结果表明,对许多因素都非常敏感,这就促使人们在报告结果时有所选择,同时也表现出确认偏差。为了克服模型的不确定性问题,我们可以采用几种方法中的一种,这种方法基于对分布的报告,而不是对系数的点估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confirmation Bias, Data Manipulation and the Kuznets Curve: Original, Environmental and Financial
Empirical work in economics and finance involves data manipulation in ways that make it possible to confirm prior beliefs. The results typically turn out to be sensitive to model specification, sample period, variable definitions and estimation methods. The status quo provides the motivation for dealing with this problem using three versions of the Kuznets curve for the purpose of illustration. The underlying hypotheses are represented by quadratic functions of income per capita, with a different dependent variable for each version of the Kuznets curve. Both time series and cross-sectional data are used to estimate the equations. The results turn out to be highly sensitive to a number of factors, which provides an incentive for being selective in the reporting of results while exhibiting confirmation bias. To overcome the model uncertainty problem one can resort to the use of one of several methods that are based on the reporting of the distribution rather than the point estimation of the coefficients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Nexus between Profitability, Dividend Policy and Share Prices in Kuwaiti Insurance Companies Corporate Transformation, Income Inequality, and Consumer Commodity Choice: The Economic Cycle in the Rise and Fall of Industries The U.S. Sanitary Pads Market: A Competitive Profile The Economic Implications of China’s Demographic Problems Social Spending and Long-term Economic Performance in the US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1