对南非科技大学博士生导师能力发展的批判性看法

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal for New Generation Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.47588/jngs.2023.21.01.a7
Lok Lategan, EP Nel, EM Bitzer
{"title":"对南非科技大学博士生导师能力发展的批判性看法","authors":"Lok Lategan, EP Nel, EM Bitzer","doi":"10.47588/jngs.2023.21.01.a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing the number of doctoral graduates, increasing the capacity for study supervision, and enhancing the quality of research output and impact remain some of the many challenges for higher education institutions in South Africa – especially for universities of technology (UoTs). Study supervisors at UoTs often lack sufficient experience and capacity to guide doctoral students to timely and successful completion. This article explores one such case as an example of critically assessing the capacity, quality, and effectiveness of supervisory development at a UoT. Our valuational stance involves observing aspects of institutional support to grow supervision capacity, comparing research performance to peer universities in the UoT cluster and engaging the South African university system as related to relevant literature on doctoral supervision and graduation. The selected institutional case revealed that supervisory capacity and subsequent graduations have improved significantly over time. However, the challenge remains to graduate increasing numbers of doctoral students, hence the need for further enhancing supervisory capacity. The inquiry also points to the need for increasing throughput figures and graduation in meeting institutional targets. The UoT under scrutiny had introduced several strategies to capacitate doctoral supervisors, including promoting relevant supervisory skills, scientific writing and communication. It also promoted research dissemination, incentives to support research capacity development, and policies to enhance quality supervision. Since the range and scope of developmental actions and activities at the selected UoT were too broad to evaluate in one project, the focus was on one aspect of supervisor support, namely an institution-wide postgraduate supervision developmental programme. Programme results for the period 2017 to 2021 were critically evaluated, addressing two key dimensions: enhancing doctoral supervision capacity and trends in doctoral graduations. These dimensions are discussed against the background of relevant literature on supervisory capacity, peer UoT cluster trends in South Africa, as well as trends related to the whole public university system in South Africa. The article concludes with important lessons learnt from the institutional case and suggestions to enhance research into doctoral supervisor developmental interventions within an UoT context.","PeriodicalId":42075,"journal":{"name":"Journal for New Generation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical View On Doctoral Supervisor Capacity Development At A South African University Of Technology\",\"authors\":\"Lok Lategan, EP Nel, EM Bitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.47588/jngs.2023.21.01.a7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Growing the number of doctoral graduates, increasing the capacity for study supervision, and enhancing the quality of research output and impact remain some of the many challenges for higher education institutions in South Africa – especially for universities of technology (UoTs). Study supervisors at UoTs often lack sufficient experience and capacity to guide doctoral students to timely and successful completion. This article explores one such case as an example of critically assessing the capacity, quality, and effectiveness of supervisory development at a UoT. Our valuational stance involves observing aspects of institutional support to grow supervision capacity, comparing research performance to peer universities in the UoT cluster and engaging the South African university system as related to relevant literature on doctoral supervision and graduation. The selected institutional case revealed that supervisory capacity and subsequent graduations have improved significantly over time. However, the challenge remains to graduate increasing numbers of doctoral students, hence the need for further enhancing supervisory capacity. The inquiry also points to the need for increasing throughput figures and graduation in meeting institutional targets. The UoT under scrutiny had introduced several strategies to capacitate doctoral supervisors, including promoting relevant supervisory skills, scientific writing and communication. It also promoted research dissemination, incentives to support research capacity development, and policies to enhance quality supervision. Since the range and scope of developmental actions and activities at the selected UoT were too broad to evaluate in one project, the focus was on one aspect of supervisor support, namely an institution-wide postgraduate supervision developmental programme. Programme results for the period 2017 to 2021 were critically evaluated, addressing two key dimensions: enhancing doctoral supervision capacity and trends in doctoral graduations. These dimensions are discussed against the background of relevant literature on supervisory capacity, peer UoT cluster trends in South Africa, as well as trends related to the whole public university system in South Africa. The article concludes with important lessons learnt from the institutional case and suggestions to enhance research into doctoral supervisor developmental interventions within an UoT context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for New Generation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for New Generation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47588/jngs.2023.21.01.a7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for New Generation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47588/jngs.2023.21.01.a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增加博士毕业生人数、提高学习指导能力、提高研究成果的质量和影响力,这些仍然是南非高等教育机构,尤其是科技大学(UoTs)面临的诸多挑战。科技大学的学习督导往往缺乏足够的经验和能力,无法指导博士生及时、顺利地完成学业。本文探讨了一个这样的案例,作为批判性评估科技大学督导发展的能力、质量和有效性的范例。我们的价值立场包括:观察机构支持提高督导能力的各个方面;将研究绩效与南非科技大学集群中的同行大学进行比较;将南非大学系统与博士生督导和毕业的相关文献联系起来。所选机构案例显示,随着时间的推移,督导能力和随后的毕业情况都有了显著改善。然而,要让越来越多的博士生毕业仍然是一项挑战,因此需要进一步提高督导能力。调查还指出,在实现院校目标的过程中,需要提高产出数字和毕业率。接受调查的UT大学采取了多项战略来提高博士生导师的能力,包括促进相关的指导技能、科学写作和交流。该大学还促进研究成果的传播、支持研究能力发展的激励措施以及提高督导质量的政策。由于选定的理工大学的发展行动和活动范围太广,无法在一个项目中进行评估,因此重点放在了导师支持的一个方面,即全校研究生督导发展计划。对 2017 至 2021 年期间的计划成果进行了严格评估,涉及两个关键方面:提高博士生指导能力和博士生毕业趋势。文章以有关督导能力的相关文献、南非的同级大学集群趋势以及与南非整个公立大学系统相关的趋势为背景,对这些方面进行了讨论。文章最后总结了从该机构案例中吸取的重要经验教训,并提出了在南非理工大学背景下加强博士生导师发展干预措施研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical View On Doctoral Supervisor Capacity Development At A South African University Of Technology
Growing the number of doctoral graduates, increasing the capacity for study supervision, and enhancing the quality of research output and impact remain some of the many challenges for higher education institutions in South Africa – especially for universities of technology (UoTs). Study supervisors at UoTs often lack sufficient experience and capacity to guide doctoral students to timely and successful completion. This article explores one such case as an example of critically assessing the capacity, quality, and effectiveness of supervisory development at a UoT. Our valuational stance involves observing aspects of institutional support to grow supervision capacity, comparing research performance to peer universities in the UoT cluster and engaging the South African university system as related to relevant literature on doctoral supervision and graduation. The selected institutional case revealed that supervisory capacity and subsequent graduations have improved significantly over time. However, the challenge remains to graduate increasing numbers of doctoral students, hence the need for further enhancing supervisory capacity. The inquiry also points to the need for increasing throughput figures and graduation in meeting institutional targets. The UoT under scrutiny had introduced several strategies to capacitate doctoral supervisors, including promoting relevant supervisory skills, scientific writing and communication. It also promoted research dissemination, incentives to support research capacity development, and policies to enhance quality supervision. Since the range and scope of developmental actions and activities at the selected UoT were too broad to evaluate in one project, the focus was on one aspect of supervisor support, namely an institution-wide postgraduate supervision developmental programme. Programme results for the period 2017 to 2021 were critically evaluated, addressing two key dimensions: enhancing doctoral supervision capacity and trends in doctoral graduations. These dimensions are discussed against the background of relevant literature on supervisory capacity, peer UoT cluster trends in South Africa, as well as trends related to the whole public university system in South Africa. The article concludes with important lessons learnt from the institutional case and suggestions to enhance research into doctoral supervisor developmental interventions within an UoT context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for New Generation Sciences
Journal for New Generation Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence Of Different Data Sources And Methods On The Estimation Of Areal Reduction Factors: Case Study In The Western Cape Province, South Africa A Critical View On Doctoral Supervisor Capacity Development At A South African University Of Technology “Help, I Need Somebody, Help…”: Supporting Doctoral Candidates In Different Fields Of Research Assisting Postgraduate Students To Synthesise Qualitative Propositions To Develop A Conceptual Framework The Possibilities Of Personalised Pathways And Portfolios For Enhancing PhD Programmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1