核磁共振成像和 CT 扫描在检测颅底耳鼻喉科病变方面的诊断准确性对比分析

A. Iqbal, S. Khursheed, M. Ibrahim, R. Ali, S.B. Munir, T.H. Khan, K. Lodhi
{"title":"核磁共振成像和 CT 扫描在检测颅底耳鼻喉科病变方面的诊断准确性对比分析","authors":"A. Iqbal, S. Khursheed, M. Ibrahim, R. Ali, S.B. Munir, T.H. Khan, K. Lodhi","doi":"10.18137/cardiometry.2023.29.103110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skull base ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) pathologies present a diagnostic challenge due to their intricate location. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) scans are commonly used diagnostic tools for detecting these pathologies. This study aims to associate the diagnostic exactness of MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. Aim: The primary objective of our current research is to assess and associate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies, including tumors, infections, and congenital anomalies. Methods: Researchers led the retrospective study of medical records from the cohort of patients with suspected skull base ENT pathologies who underwent both MRI and CT scans. Imaging reports were reviewed by experienced radiologists blinded to the clinical outcomes. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated for each modality. McNemar's test was utilized to assess statistical significance of differences in diagnostic accuracy between MRI and CT. Results: An overall of 150 individuals were involved in our research. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 85%, and NPV of 93% in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. CT scans showed a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 78%, PPV of 70%, and NPV of 80%. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was significantly higher than that of CT for detecting these pathologies (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses were performed for different types of pathologies, providing valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality. Conclusion: This comparative analysis highlights the superior diagnostic accuracy of MRI over CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. MRI offers higher sensitivity and specificity, making it a valuable tool for clinicians in the evaluation and management of individuals with these conditions. However, CT may still have a role in specific cases where MRI is contraindicated or for initial screening. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting the most appropriate imaging modality for patients with suspected skull base ENT pathologies.","PeriodicalId":41726,"journal":{"name":"Cardiometry","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy between MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies\",\"authors\":\"A. Iqbal, S. Khursheed, M. Ibrahim, R. Ali, S.B. Munir, T.H. Khan, K. Lodhi\",\"doi\":\"10.18137/cardiometry.2023.29.103110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Skull base ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) pathologies present a diagnostic challenge due to their intricate location. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) scans are commonly used diagnostic tools for detecting these pathologies. This study aims to associate the diagnostic exactness of MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. Aim: The primary objective of our current research is to assess and associate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies, including tumors, infections, and congenital anomalies. Methods: Researchers led the retrospective study of medical records from the cohort of patients with suspected skull base ENT pathologies who underwent both MRI and CT scans. Imaging reports were reviewed by experienced radiologists blinded to the clinical outcomes. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated for each modality. McNemar's test was utilized to assess statistical significance of differences in diagnostic accuracy between MRI and CT. Results: An overall of 150 individuals were involved in our research. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 85%, and NPV of 93% in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. CT scans showed a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 78%, PPV of 70%, and NPV of 80%. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was significantly higher than that of CT for detecting these pathologies (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses were performed for different types of pathologies, providing valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality. Conclusion: This comparative analysis highlights the superior diagnostic accuracy of MRI over CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. MRI offers higher sensitivity and specificity, making it a valuable tool for clinicians in the evaluation and management of individuals with these conditions. However, CT may still have a role in specific cases where MRI is contraindicated or for initial screening. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting the most appropriate imaging modality for patients with suspected skull base ENT pathologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiometry\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18137/cardiometry.2023.29.103110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18137/cardiometry.2023.29.103110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅底耳鼻喉科(耳鼻喉)病变由于位置错综复杂,给诊断带来了挑战。磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)是检测这些病变的常用诊断工具。本研究旨在将核磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描在检测颅底耳鼻喉科病变方面的诊断准确性联系起来。目的:我们目前研究的主要目的是评估和联系核磁共振成像和 CT 扫描在检测颅底耳鼻喉科病变(包括肿瘤、感染和先天性异常)方面的诊断准确性。研究方法研究人员对疑似颅底耳鼻喉科病变患者的病历进行了回顾性研究,这些患者同时接受了核磁共振成像和 CT 扫描。成像报告由经验丰富的放射科医生审核,他们对临床结果视而不见。计算了每种方式的诊断准确性指标,包括灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV)。利用 McNemar 检验评估 MRI 和 CT 诊断准确性差异的统计学意义。结果:共有 150 人参与了我们的研究。核磁共振成像在检测颅底耳鼻喉科病变方面的灵敏度为 87%,特异性为 92%,PPV 为 85%,NPV 为 93%。CT 扫描的灵敏度为 72%,特异性为 78%,PPV 为 70%,NPV 为 80%。在检测这些病变方面,磁共振成像的诊断准确性明显高于 CT(P < 0.05)。针对不同类型的病理进行了分组分析,为了解每种成像模式的优势和局限性提供了宝贵的信息。结论:该对比分析凸显了磁共振成像在检测颅底耳鼻喉科病变方面的诊断准确性优于 CT 扫描。核磁共振成像具有更高的灵敏度和特异性,使其成为临床医生评估和管理这些病症患者的重要工具。不过,在核磁共振成像禁忌症或初步筛查的特定病例中,CT 可能仍有用武之地。临床医生在为疑似颅底耳鼻喉科病变的患者选择最合适的成像方式时,应考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy between MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies
Skull base ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) pathologies present a diagnostic challenge due to their intricate location. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) scans are commonly used diagnostic tools for detecting these pathologies. This study aims to associate the diagnostic exactness of MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. Aim: The primary objective of our current research is to assess and associate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies, including tumors, infections, and congenital anomalies. Methods: Researchers led the retrospective study of medical records from the cohort of patients with suspected skull base ENT pathologies who underwent both MRI and CT scans. Imaging reports were reviewed by experienced radiologists blinded to the clinical outcomes. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated for each modality. McNemar's test was utilized to assess statistical significance of differences in diagnostic accuracy between MRI and CT. Results: An overall of 150 individuals were involved in our research. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 85%, and NPV of 93% in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. CT scans showed a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 78%, PPV of 70%, and NPV of 80%. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was significantly higher than that of CT for detecting these pathologies (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses were performed for different types of pathologies, providing valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality. Conclusion: This comparative analysis highlights the superior diagnostic accuracy of MRI over CT scans in detecting skull base ENT pathologies. MRI offers higher sensitivity and specificity, making it a valuable tool for clinicians in the evaluation and management of individuals with these conditions. However, CT may still have a role in specific cases where MRI is contraindicated or for initial screening. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting the most appropriate imaging modality for patients with suspected skull base ENT pathologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiometry
Cardiometry MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiometry is an open access biannual electronic journal founded in 2012. It refers to medicine, particularly to cardiology, as well as oncocardiology and allied science of biophysics and medical equipment engineering. We publish mainly high quality original articles, reports, case reports, reviews and lectures in the field of the theory of cardiovascular system functioning, principles of cardiometry, its diagnostic methods, cardiovascular system therapy from the aspect of cardiometry, system and particular approaches to maintaining health, engineering peculiarities in cardiometry developing. The interdisciplinary areas of the journal are: hemodynamics, biophysics, biochemistry, metrology. The target audience of our Journal covers healthcare providers including cardiologists and general practitioners, bioengineers, biophysics, medical equipment, especially cardiology diagnostics device, developers, educators, nurses, healthcare decision-makers, people with cardiovascular diseases, cardiology and engineering universities and schools, state and private clinics. Cardiometry is aimed to provide a wide forum for exchange of information and public discussion on above scientific issues for the mentioned experts.
期刊最新文献
Application of bioinspired methods and means in medicine Molecular and epidemiological study of pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients in Baghdad city-Iraq Chronic gastritis in pediatrics THREE-DIMENSIONAL IN VITRO MODELS FOR STUDYING THE CHEMOSENSITIVITY OF BREAST CANCER CELLS MOLECULAR GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OVARIAN CANCER IN CRIMEAN PATIENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1