学生在不同模式的在线和现场评估中的表现及其对学术诚信的影响

Q4 Social Sciences Curriculum and Teaching Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.7459/ct/38.2.06

Z. Radovilsky, Vishwanath G. Hegde

{"title":"学生在不同模式的在线和现场评估中的表现及其对学术诚信的影响","authors":"Z. Radovilsky, Vishwanath G. Hegde","doi":"10.7459/ct/38.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issues of academic integrity across online and in-person assessments were addressed by analyzing student total, conceptual, and numerical performance scores in the three modes of assessment: (1) In-person assessment with proctoring; (2) Online unproctored assessment; and (3) Respondus assessment online with proctoring. It was identified that the Respondus assessment allowed achieving statistically the same assessment results as those for the In-person assessments with proctoring. It was also discovered that the online or in-person course format and proctoring a test were significantly associated with all score types. In addition, the authors recommended some improvements to academic integrity of online assessment.","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Performance in Different Modes of Online and In-person Assessments and Impact on Academic Integrity\",\"authors\":\"Z. Radovilsky, Vishwanath G. Hegde\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/ct/38.2.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issues of academic integrity across online and in-person assessments were addressed by analyzing student total, conceptual, and numerical performance scores in the three modes of assessment: (1) In-person assessment with proctoring; (2) Online unproctored assessment; and (3) Respondus assessment online with proctoring. It was identified that the Respondus assessment allowed achieving statistically the same assessment results as those for the In-person assessments with proctoring. It was also discovered that the online or in-person course format and proctoring a test were significantly associated with all score types. In addition, the authors recommended some improvements to academic integrity of online assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/38.2.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/38.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

通过分析学生在以下三种评估模式中的总分、概念分和数字分，解决了在线和现场评估中的学术诚信问题：(1) 有监考的现场评估；(2) 无监考的在线评估；(3) 有监考的 Respondus 在线评估。结果表明，Respondus 测评与有监考的面对面测评在统计上取得了相同的测评结果。研究还发现，在线或面授课程形式以及监考与所有分数类型都有显著关联。此外，作者还建议改进在线评估的学术诚信。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Student Performance in Different Modes of Online and In-person Assessments and Impact on Academic Integrity

The issues of academic integrity across online and in-person assessments were addressed by analyzing student total, conceptual, and numerical performance scores in the three modes of assessment: (1) In-person assessment with proctoring; (2) Online unproctored assessment; and (3) Respondus assessment online with proctoring. It was identified that the Respondus assessment allowed achieving statistically the same assessment results as those for the In-person assessments with proctoring. It was also discovered that the online or in-person course format and proctoring a test were significantly associated with all score types. In addition, the authors recommended some improvements to academic integrity of online assessment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Curriculum and Teaching Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.