基于 GRA 的 SALBP-1 装配线平衡启发式优化选择方法

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jer.2023.11.019
Ahmad Mumani , Osama Abu-Farsakh , Sinan Obaidat , Amer Momani
{"title":"基于 GRA 的 SALBP-1 装配线平衡启发式优化选择方法","authors":"Ahmad Mumani ,&nbsp;Osama Abu-Farsakh ,&nbsp;Sinan Obaidat ,&nbsp;Amer Momani","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2023.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assembly line balancing is a compulsory approach which enables mass production of similar parts with proper efficacy. Multiple heuristics are proposed in literature to solve single model assembly line balancing problems (SALBP-1). Previous work has focused on developing and evaluating assembly line balancing heuristics and apply them to different fields. Other work investigates the factors affecting the performance of particular assembly line balancing heuristic. However, there is still a need for a guideline for selecting the most suitable heuristic for a particular application with insights into multiple performance measures. This research presents a grey relational analysis (GRA)-based approach to aid process designers in selecting the heuristic generating that yields the best line balancing. Specifically, combinations of factors of cycle time, order strength, number of tasks, and time variability are considered as operational setups of the line balancing process. The solution of each setup is solved by each heuristic, and the performance of the solution is evaluated. Then, GRA is applied to rank the heuristics on basis of the resulting grey rational grades. The proposed approach provides useful insights into the combinations suitable for a particular heuristic. In this study, time variability and cycle time are shown to have the greatest impact on the overall performance of the considered heuristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723003243/pdfft?md5=b66989fd5e51ccb2ad341b76e2995872&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723003243-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A GRA-based approach for optimal selection of SALBP-1 assembly line balancing heuristics\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Mumani ,&nbsp;Osama Abu-Farsakh ,&nbsp;Sinan Obaidat ,&nbsp;Amer Momani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jer.2023.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assembly line balancing is a compulsory approach which enables mass production of similar parts with proper efficacy. Multiple heuristics are proposed in literature to solve single model assembly line balancing problems (SALBP-1). Previous work has focused on developing and evaluating assembly line balancing heuristics and apply them to different fields. Other work investigates the factors affecting the performance of particular assembly line balancing heuristic. However, there is still a need for a guideline for selecting the most suitable heuristic for a particular application with insights into multiple performance measures. This research presents a grey relational analysis (GRA)-based approach to aid process designers in selecting the heuristic generating that yields the best line balancing. Specifically, combinations of factors of cycle time, order strength, number of tasks, and time variability are considered as operational setups of the line balancing process. The solution of each setup is solved by each heuristic, and the performance of the solution is evaluated. Then, GRA is applied to rank the heuristics on basis of the resulting grey rational grades. The proposed approach provides useful insights into the combinations suitable for a particular heuristic. In this study, time variability and cycle time are shown to have the greatest impact on the overall performance of the considered heuristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723003243/pdfft?md5=b66989fd5e51ccb2ad341b76e2995872&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723003243-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723003243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723003243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

装配线平衡是一种强制性方法,它能以适当的效率大量生产类似零件。文献中提出了多种启发式方法来解决单一模型装配线平衡问题(SALBP-1)。以往的工作主要集中在开发和评估装配线平衡启发式算法,并将其应用于不同领域。其他工作则研究了影响特定装配线平衡启发式性能的因素。然而,我们仍然需要一个指导原则,以便为特定应用选择最合适的启发式,并对多种性能指标进行深入分析。本研究提出了一种基于灰色关系分析(GRA)的方法,帮助流程设计人员选择能产生最佳生产线平衡的启发式生成器。具体来说,周期时间、订单强度、任务数量和时间可变性等因素的组合被视为生产线平衡流程的操作设置。每个启发式求解每个设置的解决方案,并评估解决方案的性能。然后,应用 GRA 根据灰色合理等级对启发式进行排序。所提出的方法为了解适合特定启发式的组合提供了有用的见解。本研究表明,时间可变性和周期时间对所考虑的启发式方法的整体性能影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A GRA-based approach for optimal selection of SALBP-1 assembly line balancing heuristics

Assembly line balancing is a compulsory approach which enables mass production of similar parts with proper efficacy. Multiple heuristics are proposed in literature to solve single model assembly line balancing problems (SALBP-1). Previous work has focused on developing and evaluating assembly line balancing heuristics and apply them to different fields. Other work investigates the factors affecting the performance of particular assembly line balancing heuristic. However, there is still a need for a guideline for selecting the most suitable heuristic for a particular application with insights into multiple performance measures. This research presents a grey relational analysis (GRA)-based approach to aid process designers in selecting the heuristic generating that yields the best line balancing. Specifically, combinations of factors of cycle time, order strength, number of tasks, and time variability are considered as operational setups of the line balancing process. The solution of each setup is solved by each heuristic, and the performance of the solution is evaluated. Then, GRA is applied to rank the heuristics on basis of the resulting grey rational grades. The proposed approach provides useful insights into the combinations suitable for a particular heuristic. In this study, time variability and cycle time are shown to have the greatest impact on the overall performance of the considered heuristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
期刊最新文献
Improvement of energy saving and indoor air quality by using a spot mixing ventilation (SMV) system in a classroom Efficacy of geopolymerization for integrated bagasse ash and quarry dust in comparison to fly ash as an admixture: A comparative study Direct flame test performance of boards containing waste undersized pumice materials Bearing performance of diaphragm wall pile combination foundation under vertical and horizontal loads Predicting academic performance of learners with the three domains of learning data using neuro-fuzzy model and machine learning algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1