摘要 6 - 治疗类风湿关节炎的疾病修饰抗风湿药与降低痴呆风险有关吗?系统回顾与元分析

W. Xie, Yue Hou, Zhuoli Zhang
{"title":"摘要 6 - 治疗类风湿关节炎的疾病修饰抗风湿药与降低痴呆风险有关吗?系统回顾与元分析","authors":"W. Xie, Yue Hou, Zhuoli Zhang","doi":"10.1142/s266134172374022x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Dysregulation of several inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in dementia patients has also been identified as a key factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to investigate the association of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy for RA with risk of incident dementia. Methods Electronic database searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were performed. Observational studies that assessed the association of dementia with DMARDs in RA were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as summary statistic. The certainty of evidence using the GRADE system. Results Fourteen studies involving 940,442 patients with RA were included. Pooled RR for developing dementia was 0.76 (95%CI 0.72-0.80) in patients taking biological DMARDs overall versus those taking conventional synthetic DMARDs, with 24% for TNF inhibitors (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.71-0.82), 24% for non-TNF biologics (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.70-0.83), separately. There was a significant subgroup effect among different types of TNF inhibitors (RR 0.58, 0.65, 0.80 for etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, respectively; P-value between groups=0.002). However, compared with nonusers of DMARDs or investigative treatment, no significant effect on dementia incidence was observed in those receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs overall (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.59-1.20), methotrexate (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.54-1.12), hydroxychloroquine (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.63-1.44), except for sulfasalazine (RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.06-1.50). Conclusions Biological DMARDs for RA are associated with decreased dementia risk, while protective effect is not observed in conventional synthetic DMARDs. Controlled clinical trials on TNF inhibitors is necessary to test their neuroprotective potentials.","PeriodicalId":15538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","volume":"224 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 6 — Are Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: for Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated with a Lower Risk of Dementia? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"W. Xie, Yue Hou, Zhuoli Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s266134172374022x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Dysregulation of several inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in dementia patients has also been identified as a key factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to investigate the association of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy for RA with risk of incident dementia. Methods Electronic database searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were performed. Observational studies that assessed the association of dementia with DMARDs in RA were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as summary statistic. The certainty of evidence using the GRADE system. Results Fourteen studies involving 940,442 patients with RA were included. Pooled RR for developing dementia was 0.76 (95%CI 0.72-0.80) in patients taking biological DMARDs overall versus those taking conventional synthetic DMARDs, with 24% for TNF inhibitors (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.71-0.82), 24% for non-TNF biologics (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.70-0.83), separately. There was a significant subgroup effect among different types of TNF inhibitors (RR 0.58, 0.65, 0.80 for etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, respectively; P-value between groups=0.002). However, compared with nonusers of DMARDs or investigative treatment, no significant effect on dementia incidence was observed in those receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs overall (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.59-1.20), methotrexate (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.54-1.12), hydroxychloroquine (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.63-1.44), except for sulfasalazine (RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.06-1.50). Conclusions Biological DMARDs for RA are associated with decreased dementia risk, while protective effect is not observed in conventional synthetic DMARDs. Controlled clinical trials on TNF inhibitors is necessary to test their neuroprotective potentials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s266134172374022x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s266134172374022x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 痴呆症患者体内包括肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)在内的几种炎症细胞因子的失调也被认为是类风湿性关节炎(RA)发病机制中的一个关键因素。我们的目的是调查类风湿关节炎的改良抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗与痴呆症发病风险的关系。方法 对 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 进行电子数据库检索。纳入了评估痴呆症与 RA DMARDs 关联性的观察性研究。汇总风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 作为汇总统计量。采用 GRADE 系统对证据的确定性进行评估。结果 共纳入14项研究,涉及940442名RA患者。服用生物DMARDs的患者与服用传统合成DMARDs的患者相比,患痴呆症的总RR为0.76(95%CI为0.72-0.80),其中TNF抑制剂为24%(RR为0.76,95%CI为0.71-0.82),非TNF生物制剂为24%(RR为0.76,95%CI为0.70-0.83)。不同类型的TNF抑制剂之间存在明显的亚组效应(依那西普、阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗的RR分别为0.58、0.65、0.80;组间P值=0.002)。然而,与未使用DMARDs或研究性治疗的患者相比,接受常规合成DMARDs治疗的患者(RR为0.84,95%CI为0.59-1.20)、甲氨蝶呤(RR为0.78,95%CI为0.54-1.12)、羟氯喹(RR为0.95,95%CI为0.63-1.44)对痴呆症的发生率无显著影响,但磺胺沙拉秦(RR为1.27,95%CI为1.06-1.50)除外。结论 治疗RA的生物DMARDs可降低痴呆风险,而传统合成DMARDs则没有保护作用。有必要对 TNF 抑制剂进行对照临床试验,以检验其神经保护潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract 6 — Are Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: for Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated with a Lower Risk of Dementia? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Background Dysregulation of several inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in dementia patients has also been identified as a key factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to investigate the association of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy for RA with risk of incident dementia. Methods Electronic database searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were performed. Observational studies that assessed the association of dementia with DMARDs in RA were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as summary statistic. The certainty of evidence using the GRADE system. Results Fourteen studies involving 940,442 patients with RA were included. Pooled RR for developing dementia was 0.76 (95%CI 0.72-0.80) in patients taking biological DMARDs overall versus those taking conventional synthetic DMARDs, with 24% for TNF inhibitors (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.71-0.82), 24% for non-TNF biologics (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.70-0.83), separately. There was a significant subgroup effect among different types of TNF inhibitors (RR 0.58, 0.65, 0.80 for etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, respectively; P-value between groups=0.002). However, compared with nonusers of DMARDs or investigative treatment, no significant effect on dementia incidence was observed in those receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs overall (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.59-1.20), methotrexate (RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.54-1.12), hydroxychloroquine (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.63-1.44), except for sulfasalazine (RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.06-1.50). Conclusions Biological DMARDs for RA are associated with decreased dementia risk, while protective effect is not observed in conventional synthetic DMARDs. Controlled clinical trials on TNF inhibitors is necessary to test their neuroprotective potentials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics, Predictors for Mortality and Comparison of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and the Five-Factor Score on Survival in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in Hong Kong Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy: An Evaluation by CT Coronary Angiography A Case of Polyarteritis Nodosa and Antiphospholipid Antibody Positivity Presenting with Intramuscular Haematoma Abstract 20 — Performance of Various Definitions for Active MRI: Lesions in Sacroiliac Joint and Spine in Discriminating Patients with Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Abstract 27 — Prevalence and Management Approach of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Rheumatology Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1