对居家老人进行为期六个月的前瞻性干预研究。患者报告和观察结果。

Jeanette Kjernsholen MD , Inger Schou-Bredal PhD, RN, OUS , Rolf Kaaresen MD, PhD, OUS , Helene Lundgaard Soberg PhD , Aase Sagen PhD
{"title":"对居家老人进行为期六个月的前瞻性干预研究。患者报告和观察结果。","authors":"Jeanette Kjernsholen MD ,&nbsp;Inger Schou-Bredal PhD, RN, OUS ,&nbsp;Rolf Kaaresen MD, PhD, OUS ,&nbsp;Helene Lundgaard Soberg PhD ,&nbsp;Aase Sagen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the effect of a reablement intervention (a person-centered, interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach) compared with usual care services in home-dwelling elderly experiencing functional declines in activities of daily living.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A non-randomized controlled trial comparing a reablement intervention with usual care; outcomes were measured at baseline, after intervention, and at a 6-month from baseline in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Municipal public health service.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Sixty-five home-dwelling elderly with functional decline were assigned by the participants home care service zone to a reablement group (n=35), or a usual care group (n=30). The mean participant age was 80±11 years in the reablement group and 78±12 in the usual care group.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The reablement group received a person-centered and tailored reablement program provided by an interdisciplinary team, consisting of a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, and a nurse. The usual care group received standard home care services.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The dimension “Your health today” from the European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale (HRQOL), the patient-specific functional scale for goals in ADL (PSFS), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and home care services in hours per week.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant differences over time in favor of the reablement group with between-group effect sizes of Cohen h<sup>2</sup>=0.36 (<em>P</em>=.001) for HRQOL, h<sup>2</sup>=0.60 (<em>P</em>=.001) for PSFS, h<sup>2</sup>=0.30 (<em>P</em>=.001) for SPPB, and h<sup>2</sup>=0.10 (<em>P=</em>.013) for hours of home care services per week. The within-group effect size for PSFS was h<sup>2</sup>=0.15 (<em>P=</em>.010) in favor of the reablement group. The mean number of hours of home care services per week was mean 0.38±1.07 (<em>P</em>=.001) in the reablement group and mean 30.38±64.13 (<em>P</em>=.023) in the usual care group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The participants in the reablement group achieved and maintained better physical function, a higher HRQOL and needed considerably less home care services than the usual care group participants. Thus, reablement appears to be a more beneficial and sustainable approach than the usual care services for the home-dwelling elderly with functional decline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000733/pdfft?md5=f307fb070aae2676db1f261e9d5ca0e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000733-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Intervention Study With 6 Months Follow-up of the Effect of Reablement in Home Dwelling Elderly: Patient-reported and Observed Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Jeanette Kjernsholen MD ,&nbsp;Inger Schou-Bredal PhD, RN, OUS ,&nbsp;Rolf Kaaresen MD, PhD, OUS ,&nbsp;Helene Lundgaard Soberg PhD ,&nbsp;Aase Sagen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the effect of a reablement intervention (a person-centered, interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach) compared with usual care services in home-dwelling elderly experiencing functional declines in activities of daily living.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A non-randomized controlled trial comparing a reablement intervention with usual care; outcomes were measured at baseline, after intervention, and at a 6-month from baseline in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Municipal public health service.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Sixty-five home-dwelling elderly with functional decline were assigned by the participants home care service zone to a reablement group (n=35), or a usual care group (n=30). The mean participant age was 80±11 years in the reablement group and 78±12 in the usual care group.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The reablement group received a person-centered and tailored reablement program provided by an interdisciplinary team, consisting of a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, and a nurse. The usual care group received standard home care services.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The dimension “Your health today” from the European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale (HRQOL), the patient-specific functional scale for goals in ADL (PSFS), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and home care services in hours per week.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant differences over time in favor of the reablement group with between-group effect sizes of Cohen h<sup>2</sup>=0.36 (<em>P</em>=.001) for HRQOL, h<sup>2</sup>=0.60 (<em>P</em>=.001) for PSFS, h<sup>2</sup>=0.30 (<em>P</em>=.001) for SPPB, and h<sup>2</sup>=0.10 (<em>P=</em>.013) for hours of home care services per week. The within-group effect size for PSFS was h<sup>2</sup>=0.15 (<em>P=</em>.010) in favor of the reablement group. The mean number of hours of home care services per week was mean 0.38±1.07 (<em>P</em>=.001) in the reablement group and mean 30.38±64.13 (<em>P</em>=.023) in the usual care group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The participants in the reablement group achieved and maintained better physical function, a higher HRQOL and needed considerably less home care services than the usual care group participants. Thus, reablement appears to be a more beneficial and sustainable approach than the usual care services for the home-dwelling elderly with functional decline.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000733/pdfft?md5=f307fb070aae2676db1f261e9d5ca0e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000733-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 研究以人为本、跨学科的康复干预与常规护理服务相比,对日常生活活动能力下降的居家老人实施康复干预(一种以人为本的跨学科康复方法)的效果。设计一项非随机对照试验,比较长者护理干预与常规护理;两组长者分别在基线、干预后和自基线起 6 个月时接受结果测量。干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预干预主要结果测量欧洲生活质量-视觉类比量表(HRQOL)中的 "您今天的健康状况 "维度、患者特异性ADL目标功能量表(PSFS)、短期体能测试(SPPB)以及家庭护理服务(每周小时数)。结果随着时间的推移,科恩效应大小为:HRQOL h2=0.36 (P=.001),PSFS h2=0.60 (P=.001),SPPB h2=0.30 (P=.001),每周家庭护理服务小时数 h2=0.10 (P=.013)。PSFS 的组内效应大小为 h2=0.15 (P=.010),有利于康复组。每周家庭护理服务的平均小时数,暂缓治疗组为 0.38±1.07 (P=.001),常规护理组为 30.38±64.13 (P=.023)。因此,对于功能衰退的居家老人来说,与常规护理服务相比,康复护理似乎是一种更有益、更可持续的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prospective Intervention Study With 6 Months Follow-up of the Effect of Reablement in Home Dwelling Elderly: Patient-reported and Observed Outcomes

Objectives

To investigate the effect of a reablement intervention (a person-centered, interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach) compared with usual care services in home-dwelling elderly experiencing functional declines in activities of daily living.

Design

A non-randomized controlled trial comparing a reablement intervention with usual care; outcomes were measured at baseline, after intervention, and at a 6-month from baseline in both groups.

Setting

Municipal public health service.

Participants

Sixty-five home-dwelling elderly with functional decline were assigned by the participants home care service zone to a reablement group (n=35), or a usual care group (n=30). The mean participant age was 80±11 years in the reablement group and 78±12 in the usual care group.

Intervention

The reablement group received a person-centered and tailored reablement program provided by an interdisciplinary team, consisting of a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist, and a nurse. The usual care group received standard home care services.

Main Outcome Measures

The dimension “Your health today” from the European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale (HRQOL), the patient-specific functional scale for goals in ADL (PSFS), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and home care services in hours per week.

Results

There were significant differences over time in favor of the reablement group with between-group effect sizes of Cohen h2=0.36 (P=.001) for HRQOL, h2=0.60 (P=.001) for PSFS, h2=0.30 (P=.001) for SPPB, and h2=0.10 (P=.013) for hours of home care services per week. The within-group effect size for PSFS was h2=0.15 (P=.010) in favor of the reablement group. The mean number of hours of home care services per week was mean 0.38±1.07 (P=.001) in the reablement group and mean 30.38±64.13 (P=.023) in the usual care group.

Conclusions

The participants in the reablement group achieved and maintained better physical function, a higher HRQOL and needed considerably less home care services than the usual care group participants. Thus, reablement appears to be a more beneficial and sustainable approach than the usual care services for the home-dwelling elderly with functional decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies Effects of Pilates on Body Posture: A Systematic Review Randomized Trial to Evaluate Effects of Peer- and Clinician-Led Interventions for Caregivers of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury Creation of a Limb Loss and Preservation Registry for Improving the Quality of Patient Care in the United States Comparison of Diagnosis-Related Group Rehabilitation Reimbursement Payments With Those of a Novel Patient Classification-Based Payment System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1