摘要 19 - 脊柱关节炎(SpA)的靶向治疗:是否存在性别差异?

Isaac T Cheng, Ho So, C. C. Y. Yip, YING-YING Leung, Kichul Shin, Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, P. Chiowchanwisawakit, M. Hammoudeh, Muhammad Haroon, S. Nallasivan, S. Angkodjojo, James Ho Yin Chung, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, James Wei, L. Tam
{"title":"摘要 19 - 脊柱关节炎(SpA)的靶向治疗:是否存在性别差异?","authors":"Isaac T Cheng, Ho So, C. C. Y. Yip, YING-YING Leung, Kichul Shin, Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, P. Chiowchanwisawakit, M. Hammoudeh, Muhammad Haroon, S. Nallasivan, S. Angkodjojo, James Ho Yin Chung, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, James Wei, L. Tam","doi":"10.1142/s2661341723740358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies have reported that female patients with spondyloarthritis have different disease courses and treatment responses compared to male patients. Whether patients’ sex is associated with a different outcome after receiving one-year of tight control, treat-to-target (T2T) strategy remains uncertain. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the differences in the clinical response between male and female patients from the APLAR SpA Registry. Methods: Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR 2006 classification criteria for PsA and 2009 ASAS classification for axSpA were recruited. They received 1 year of protocolized treatment aiming at 1) MDA or DAPSA-LDA for PsA patients, and 2) ASDAS-LDA for axSpA patients. Patients were assessed every 3-monthly and treatment was escalated if target was not reached. Results: Ninety-one male (age: 45.6±16.1, 43 PsA, 48 axSpA) and 52 female (age: 49.2±13.4, 36 PsA, 16 axSpA) patients were included. There was no significant difference between the 2 sexes at baseline, except a higher ESR and more severe enthesitis in female patients. During the study period, the use of csDMARDs and NSAIDs decreased slightly, whilst the use of bDMARDs significantly increased across both sexes (Fig. 1a). Considering the whole cohort, there were significant improvement in disease activity in PsA after 1-year and disease activity in axSpA remained low. Despite similar bDMARDs use at 1-year, female PsA patients had a lower MDA achievement rate (36% in female vs 51% in male). Female patients also remained to have a higher physician global assessment score (2.61±1.76 in female vs 1.98±1.57 in male, p=0.03), greater functional impairment (HAQ: 0.54±0.57 in female vs 0.32±0.46 in male, p=0.01) and more severe enthesitis (SPARCC: 0.83±1.67 in female vs 0.16±1.09 in male, p=0.005) at 1-year. There was also a trend of higher perceived disease burden and peripheral involvement in female (Fig. 1b). Conclusion: There may be differential treat-to-target responses between male and female SpA patients. The causes of such differential characteristics should be further explored to potentially implement a sex-specific treat-to-target strategy for spondyloarthritis.","PeriodicalId":15538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 19 — Treat-to-Target in Spondyloarthritis (SpA): Are There Sex-Related Differential Responses?\",\"authors\":\"Isaac T Cheng, Ho So, C. C. Y. Yip, YING-YING Leung, Kichul Shin, Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, P. Chiowchanwisawakit, M. Hammoudeh, Muhammad Haroon, S. Nallasivan, S. Angkodjojo, James Ho Yin Chung, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, James Wei, L. Tam\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2661341723740358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Studies have reported that female patients with spondyloarthritis have different disease courses and treatment responses compared to male patients. Whether patients’ sex is associated with a different outcome after receiving one-year of tight control, treat-to-target (T2T) strategy remains uncertain. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the differences in the clinical response between male and female patients from the APLAR SpA Registry. Methods: Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR 2006 classification criteria for PsA and 2009 ASAS classification for axSpA were recruited. They received 1 year of protocolized treatment aiming at 1) MDA or DAPSA-LDA for PsA patients, and 2) ASDAS-LDA for axSpA patients. Patients were assessed every 3-monthly and treatment was escalated if target was not reached. Results: Ninety-one male (age: 45.6±16.1, 43 PsA, 48 axSpA) and 52 female (age: 49.2±13.4, 36 PsA, 16 axSpA) patients were included. There was no significant difference between the 2 sexes at baseline, except a higher ESR and more severe enthesitis in female patients. During the study period, the use of csDMARDs and NSAIDs decreased slightly, whilst the use of bDMARDs significantly increased across both sexes (Fig. 1a). Considering the whole cohort, there were significant improvement in disease activity in PsA after 1-year and disease activity in axSpA remained low. Despite similar bDMARDs use at 1-year, female PsA patients had a lower MDA achievement rate (36% in female vs 51% in male). Female patients also remained to have a higher physician global assessment score (2.61±1.76 in female vs 1.98±1.57 in male, p=0.03), greater functional impairment (HAQ: 0.54±0.57 in female vs 0.32±0.46 in male, p=0.01) and more severe enthesitis (SPARCC: 0.83±1.67 in female vs 0.16±1.09 in male, p=0.005) at 1-year. There was also a trend of higher perceived disease burden and peripheral involvement in female (Fig. 1b). Conclusion: There may be differential treat-to-target responses between male and female SpA patients. The causes of such differential characteristics should be further explored to potentially implement a sex-specific treat-to-target strategy for spondyloarthritis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723740358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723740358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有研究报告称,女性脊柱关节炎患者的病程和治疗反应与男性患者不同。在接受为期一年的严格控制、靶向治疗(T2T)策略后,患者的性别是否与不同的治疗结果有关仍不确定。因此,本研究旨在评估 APLAR SpA 登记处男女患者临床反应的差异。研究方法招募符合 CASPAR 2006 年 PsA 分类标准和 2009 年 ASAS axSpA 分类标准的患者。他们接受了为期一年的方案治疗:1)PsA 患者接受 MDA 或 DAPSA-LDA 治疗;2)axSpA 患者接受 ASDAS-LDA 治疗。每 3 个月对患者进行一次评估,如果未达到目标,则升级治疗。结果91例男性患者(年龄:45.6±16.1,43例PsA,48例axSpA)和52例女性患者(年龄:49.2±13.4,36例PsA,16例axSpA)被纳入研究。除了女性患者的血沉较高和更严重的腱鞘炎外,男女患者在基线时无明显差异。在研究期间,csDMARDs 和 NSAIDs 的使用略有减少,而 bDMARDs 的使用在男女患者中均显著增加(图 1a)。从整个队列来看,PsA 的疾病活动度在 1 年后有明显改善,而 axSpA 的疾病活动度仍然较低。尽管一年内使用的 bDMARDs 相似,但女性 PsA 患者的 MDA 达标率较低(女性为 36%,男性为 51%)。此外,女性患者在1年时的医生总体评估得分(女性为2.61±1.76,男性为1.98±1.57,P=0.03)、功能障碍(HAQ:女性为0.54±0.57,男性为0.32±0.46,P=0.01)和关节内膜炎(SPARCC:女性为0.83±1.67,男性为0.16±1.09,P=0.005)方面仍然较高。女性患者的疾病负担感知和外周受累程度也呈上升趋势(图 1b)。结论男性和女性 SpA 患者对治疗目标的反应可能存在差异。应进一步探讨造成这种差异的原因,以便有可能针对脊柱关节炎实施有性别针对性的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract 19 — Treat-to-Target in Spondyloarthritis (SpA): Are There Sex-Related Differential Responses?
Background: Studies have reported that female patients with spondyloarthritis have different disease courses and treatment responses compared to male patients. Whether patients’ sex is associated with a different outcome after receiving one-year of tight control, treat-to-target (T2T) strategy remains uncertain. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the differences in the clinical response between male and female patients from the APLAR SpA Registry. Methods: Patients who fulfilled the CASPAR 2006 classification criteria for PsA and 2009 ASAS classification for axSpA were recruited. They received 1 year of protocolized treatment aiming at 1) MDA or DAPSA-LDA for PsA patients, and 2) ASDAS-LDA for axSpA patients. Patients were assessed every 3-monthly and treatment was escalated if target was not reached. Results: Ninety-one male (age: 45.6±16.1, 43 PsA, 48 axSpA) and 52 female (age: 49.2±13.4, 36 PsA, 16 axSpA) patients were included. There was no significant difference between the 2 sexes at baseline, except a higher ESR and more severe enthesitis in female patients. During the study period, the use of csDMARDs and NSAIDs decreased slightly, whilst the use of bDMARDs significantly increased across both sexes (Fig. 1a). Considering the whole cohort, there were significant improvement in disease activity in PsA after 1-year and disease activity in axSpA remained low. Despite similar bDMARDs use at 1-year, female PsA patients had a lower MDA achievement rate (36% in female vs 51% in male). Female patients also remained to have a higher physician global assessment score (2.61±1.76 in female vs 1.98±1.57 in male, p=0.03), greater functional impairment (HAQ: 0.54±0.57 in female vs 0.32±0.46 in male, p=0.01) and more severe enthesitis (SPARCC: 0.83±1.67 in female vs 0.16±1.09 in male, p=0.005) at 1-year. There was also a trend of higher perceived disease burden and peripheral involvement in female (Fig. 1b). Conclusion: There may be differential treat-to-target responses between male and female SpA patients. The causes of such differential characteristics should be further explored to potentially implement a sex-specific treat-to-target strategy for spondyloarthritis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics, Predictors for Mortality and Comparison of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and the Five-Factor Score on Survival in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in Hong Kong Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy: An Evaluation by CT Coronary Angiography A Case of Polyarteritis Nodosa and Antiphospholipid Antibody Positivity Presenting with Intramuscular Haematoma Abstract 20 — Performance of Various Definitions for Active MRI: Lesions in Sacroiliac Joint and Spine in Discriminating Patients with Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Abstract 27 — Prevalence and Management Approach of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Rheumatology Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1